Article 6 - The Legal Nature of New Generation Free Trade Agreements: Lessons from the CETA Saga

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira Coutinho , Francisco
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.21814/perspectivas.4565
Resumo: The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) is a “new generation” bilateral “mixed” free trade agreement signed on 30 October 2016 between Canada and the European Union alongside its Member States. In the European Union, “mixed” trade agreements follow an adoption procedure that determines, in the best-case scenario, a substantial delay to their entry into force, and, in the worst, a veto by Member States that damages the international standing of the European Union. The European Com­mission bowed to Member States’ pressure and decided to qualify CETA as a “mixed agreement” instead of an “EU-only agreement”. That the “guardian of the Treaties” had no constitutional leeway on the choice of CETA’s approval form became clear after the decision of the Court of Justice on the free trade agreement nego­tiated between the European Union and Singapore (Opinion 2/15). CETA’s “mixed” nature determines that its application is limited and provisional, and under a permanent Damocles sword existential threat.
id RCAP_2d30dc041a3956bc2d24fb1bc164abd5
oai_identifier_str oai:journals.uminho.pt:article/4565
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Article 6 - The Legal Nature of New Generation Free Trade Agreements: Lessons from the CETA SagaArticlesThe Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) is a “new generation” bilateral “mixed” free trade agreement signed on 30 October 2016 between Canada and the European Union alongside its Member States. In the European Union, “mixed” trade agreements follow an adoption procedure that determines, in the best-case scenario, a substantial delay to their entry into force, and, in the worst, a veto by Member States that damages the international standing of the European Union. The European Com­mission bowed to Member States’ pressure and decided to qualify CETA as a “mixed agreement” instead of an “EU-only agreement”. That the “guardian of the Treaties” had no constitutional leeway on the choice of CETA’s approval form became clear after the decision of the Court of Justice on the free trade agreement nego­tiated between the European Union and Singapore (Opinion 2/15). CETA’s “mixed” nature determines that its application is limited and provisional, and under a permanent Damocles sword existential threat.Research Center in Political Science (University of Minho and University of Évora, Portugal)2022-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.21814/perspectivas.4565eng2184-39021646-2157Pereira Coutinho , Franciscoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-02-10T16:30:13Zoai:journals.uminho.pt:article/4565Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:46:24.184918Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Article 6 - The Legal Nature of New Generation Free Trade Agreements: Lessons from the CETA Saga
title Article 6 - The Legal Nature of New Generation Free Trade Agreements: Lessons from the CETA Saga
spellingShingle Article 6 - The Legal Nature of New Generation Free Trade Agreements: Lessons from the CETA Saga
Pereira Coutinho , Francisco
Articles
title_short Article 6 - The Legal Nature of New Generation Free Trade Agreements: Lessons from the CETA Saga
title_full Article 6 - The Legal Nature of New Generation Free Trade Agreements: Lessons from the CETA Saga
title_fullStr Article 6 - The Legal Nature of New Generation Free Trade Agreements: Lessons from the CETA Saga
title_full_unstemmed Article 6 - The Legal Nature of New Generation Free Trade Agreements: Lessons from the CETA Saga
title_sort Article 6 - The Legal Nature of New Generation Free Trade Agreements: Lessons from the CETA Saga
author Pereira Coutinho , Francisco
author_facet Pereira Coutinho , Francisco
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira Coutinho , Francisco
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Articles
topic Articles
description The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) is a “new generation” bilateral “mixed” free trade agreement signed on 30 October 2016 between Canada and the European Union alongside its Member States. In the European Union, “mixed” trade agreements follow an adoption procedure that determines, in the best-case scenario, a substantial delay to their entry into force, and, in the worst, a veto by Member States that damages the international standing of the European Union. The European Com­mission bowed to Member States’ pressure and decided to qualify CETA as a “mixed agreement” instead of an “EU-only agreement”. That the “guardian of the Treaties” had no constitutional leeway on the choice of CETA’s approval form became clear after the decision of the Court of Justice on the free trade agreement nego­tiated between the European Union and Singapore (Opinion 2/15). CETA’s “mixed” nature determines that its application is limited and provisional, and under a permanent Damocles sword existential threat.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-21
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.21814/perspectivas.4565
url https://doi.org/10.21814/perspectivas.4565
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2184-3902
1646-2157
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research Center in Political Science (University of Minho and University of Évora, Portugal)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research Center in Political Science (University of Minho and University of Évora, Portugal)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130935425236992