Closing the Gap Between Urban Planning and Urban Ecology: A South African Perspective

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: van Zyl, Burné
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Cilliers, E. Juaneé, Lategan, Louis G., Cilliers, Sarel S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i4.4456
Resumo: Ecological considerations should be an integral part of the decision-making processes of urban planners. Specifically, ecological aspects used in urban ecology, such as green infrastructure and ecosystem services, are substantiated by literature as strategies for improving quality of life, human health, and well-being. Studies dealing with such concepts in the Global South recently gained interest; however, these lack empirical evidence on the integration thereof in mainstream South African urban planning practice. This article conducts a preliminary investigation into the knowledge of ecological aspects of a sample of South African urban planners and their willingness to implement ecological aspects in urban planning practice. The new environmental paradigm scale is employed to determine the environmental worldview (ecocentric or anthropocentric) among respondent and how this relates to their knowledge of ecological aspects. The initial research sample consisted of a total of 283 questionnaires distributed. Although findings of this article are based on a low response rate (15%) of 42 documented responses, it did not affect the validity of the data collected in this context. The initial findings indicated that the environmental worldview of the sample of planners is only one factor influencing their perspective on incorporating ecological considerations. Low to moderate knowledge and awareness regarding ecological aspects such as ecosystem services, green infrastructure, and multi-functionality are argued to be main factors preventing integration in urban planning practice. Findings emphasize the need for context-based implementation strategies and broad recommendations are made for the planning profession as a point of departure to introduce or ingrain ecological considerations.
id RCAP_2e39818e96e897b51fc37f283459911c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4456
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Closing the Gap Between Urban Planning and Urban Ecology: A South African Perspectiveecosystem services; green infrastructure planning; multi-functionality; South Africa; urban ecology; urban planners; urban planning practiceEcological considerations should be an integral part of the decision-making processes of urban planners. Specifically, ecological aspects used in urban ecology, such as green infrastructure and ecosystem services, are substantiated by literature as strategies for improving quality of life, human health, and well-being. Studies dealing with such concepts in the Global South recently gained interest; however, these lack empirical evidence on the integration thereof in mainstream South African urban planning practice. This article conducts a preliminary investigation into the knowledge of ecological aspects of a sample of South African urban planners and their willingness to implement ecological aspects in urban planning practice. The new environmental paradigm scale is employed to determine the environmental worldview (ecocentric or anthropocentric) among respondent and how this relates to their knowledge of ecological aspects. The initial research sample consisted of a total of 283 questionnaires distributed. Although findings of this article are based on a low response rate (15%) of 42 documented responses, it did not affect the validity of the data collected in this context. The initial findings indicated that the environmental worldview of the sample of planners is only one factor influencing their perspective on incorporating ecological considerations. Low to moderate knowledge and awareness regarding ecological aspects such as ecosystem services, green infrastructure, and multi-functionality are argued to be main factors preventing integration in urban planning practice. Findings emphasize the need for context-based implementation strategies and broad recommendations are made for the planning profession as a point of departure to introduce or ingrain ecological considerations.Cogitatio2021-10-14info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i4.4456oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4456Urban Planning; Vol 6, No 4 (2021): Towards Green(er) Cities: Contextualizing Green Benefits for Urban Spaces and Contemporary Societies; 122-1342183-7635reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4456https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i4.4456https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4456/4456Copyright (c) 2021 Burné van Zyl, E. Juaneé Cilliers, Louis G. Lategan, Sarel S. Cilliershttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessvan Zyl, BurnéCilliers, E. JuaneéLategan, Louis G.Cilliers, Sarel S.2022-12-20T10:59:43Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4456Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:53.420027Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Closing the Gap Between Urban Planning and Urban Ecology: A South African Perspective
title Closing the Gap Between Urban Planning and Urban Ecology: A South African Perspective
spellingShingle Closing the Gap Between Urban Planning and Urban Ecology: A South African Perspective
van Zyl, Burné
ecosystem services; green infrastructure planning; multi-functionality; South Africa; urban ecology; urban planners; urban planning practice
title_short Closing the Gap Between Urban Planning and Urban Ecology: A South African Perspective
title_full Closing the Gap Between Urban Planning and Urban Ecology: A South African Perspective
title_fullStr Closing the Gap Between Urban Planning and Urban Ecology: A South African Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Closing the Gap Between Urban Planning and Urban Ecology: A South African Perspective
title_sort Closing the Gap Between Urban Planning and Urban Ecology: A South African Perspective
author van Zyl, Burné
author_facet van Zyl, Burné
Cilliers, E. Juaneé
Lategan, Louis G.
Cilliers, Sarel S.
author_role author
author2 Cilliers, E. Juaneé
Lategan, Louis G.
Cilliers, Sarel S.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv van Zyl, Burné
Cilliers, E. Juaneé
Lategan, Louis G.
Cilliers, Sarel S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ecosystem services; green infrastructure planning; multi-functionality; South Africa; urban ecology; urban planners; urban planning practice
topic ecosystem services; green infrastructure planning; multi-functionality; South Africa; urban ecology; urban planners; urban planning practice
description Ecological considerations should be an integral part of the decision-making processes of urban planners. Specifically, ecological aspects used in urban ecology, such as green infrastructure and ecosystem services, are substantiated by literature as strategies for improving quality of life, human health, and well-being. Studies dealing with such concepts in the Global South recently gained interest; however, these lack empirical evidence on the integration thereof in mainstream South African urban planning practice. This article conducts a preliminary investigation into the knowledge of ecological aspects of a sample of South African urban planners and their willingness to implement ecological aspects in urban planning practice. The new environmental paradigm scale is employed to determine the environmental worldview (ecocentric or anthropocentric) among respondent and how this relates to their knowledge of ecological aspects. The initial research sample consisted of a total of 283 questionnaires distributed. Although findings of this article are based on a low response rate (15%) of 42 documented responses, it did not affect the validity of the data collected in this context. The initial findings indicated that the environmental worldview of the sample of planners is only one factor influencing their perspective on incorporating ecological considerations. Low to moderate knowledge and awareness regarding ecological aspects such as ecosystem services, green infrastructure, and multi-functionality are argued to be main factors preventing integration in urban planning practice. Findings emphasize the need for context-based implementation strategies and broad recommendations are made for the planning profession as a point of departure to introduce or ingrain ecological considerations.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-14
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i4.4456
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4456
url https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i4.4456
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4456
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4456
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i4.4456
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4456/4456
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Burné van Zyl, E. Juaneé Cilliers, Louis G. Lategan, Sarel S. Cilliers
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Burné van Zyl, E. Juaneé Cilliers, Louis G. Lategan, Sarel S. Cilliers
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Urban Planning; Vol 6, No 4 (2021): Towards Green(er) Cities: Contextualizing Green Benefits for Urban Spaces and Contemporary Societies; 122-134
2183-7635
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130665125412864