One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/23141 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00074 |
Resumo: | The increasing occurrence of human cysticercosis, a zoonotic neglected disease, is challenging the traditional prevention and control paradigm and calling for One Health (OH) solutions in industrialized countries. OH solutions for health interventions are increasingly being used to capture expected and unexpected outcomes across people, animals and the environment. The Network for One Health Evaluation (NEOH) proposes an evidence-based framework, relying on systems and mixed methods approaches to evaluate the One Healthness. In this case study, this tool is used to evaluate the design of the Observatory of Taeniasis and Cysticercosis, as an example of inter-sectorial collaboration for surveillance in Portugal. The OH initiative (drivers, expected outcomes) and its system (boundaries, aim, dimensions, actors, stakeholders) were described. The different aspects of this initiative were scored with values from 0 (=no OH approach) to 1 (=perfect OH approach). The OH index was 0.31. Its OH ratio is 1.98. Overall scores were: OH thinking 0.75; OH planning 0.60; OH working 0.60; OH sharing 0.35; OH learning 0.50 and Systemic organization 0.50. Operational levels of the Initiative are the main strengths, indicating a comprehensive multidimensional innovative approach and transdisciplinarity. Critical issues in the supporting infrastructure were observed, related to communication, learning and organizational gaps in the project, with the evaluation being conducted as the project is being designed and implemented. The strengths and weaknesses detected may be used to refine the initiative. This case study therefore exemplifies and supports OH assessment also for ongoing projects, at design and early implementation stages for guiding and guaranteeing a OH oriented perspective. |
id |
RCAP_2f65082ed7e94afb1568159d45a02cf4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/23141 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in PortugalOne Healthcase studyneglected diseasesurveillanceevaluationcysticercosis,The increasing occurrence of human cysticercosis, a zoonotic neglected disease, is challenging the traditional prevention and control paradigm and calling for One Health (OH) solutions in industrialized countries. OH solutions for health interventions are increasingly being used to capture expected and unexpected outcomes across people, animals and the environment. The Network for One Health Evaluation (NEOH) proposes an evidence-based framework, relying on systems and mixed methods approaches to evaluate the One Healthness. In this case study, this tool is used to evaluate the design of the Observatory of Taeniasis and Cysticercosis, as an example of inter-sectorial collaboration for surveillance in Portugal. The OH initiative (drivers, expected outcomes) and its system (boundaries, aim, dimensions, actors, stakeholders) were described. The different aspects of this initiative were scored with values from 0 (=no OH approach) to 1 (=perfect OH approach). The OH index was 0.31. Its OH ratio is 1.98. Overall scores were: OH thinking 0.75; OH planning 0.60; OH working 0.60; OH sharing 0.35; OH learning 0.50 and Systemic organization 0.50. Operational levels of the Initiative are the main strengths, indicating a comprehensive multidimensional innovative approach and transdisciplinarity. Critical issues in the supporting infrastructure were observed, related to communication, learning and organizational gaps in the project, with the evaluation being conducted as the project is being designed and implemented. The strengths and weaknesses detected may be used to refine the initiative. This case study therefore exemplifies and supports OH assessment also for ongoing projects, at design and early implementation stages for guiding and guaranteeing a OH oriented perspective.Frontiers in Public Health2018-04-30T14:06:11Z2018-04-302018-03-13T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/23141http://hdl.handle.net/10174/23141https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00074engFonseca AG, Torgal J, de Meneghi D, Gabriël S, Coelho AC and Vilhena M (2018) One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal. Front. Public Health 6:74. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.000742296-2565https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00074anagloriafonseca@gmail.comjorgetorgal@gmail.comdaniele.demeneghi@unito.itsarah.gabriel@ugent.beaccoelho@utad.ptmmcv@uevora.ptnd239Fonseca, Ana GloriaTorgal, Jorgede Meneghi, DanieleGabriël, SarahCoelho, Ana CláudiaVilhena, ManuelaVilhena, Manuelainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:14:50Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/23141Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:13:56.270788Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal |
title |
One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal |
spellingShingle |
One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal Fonseca, Ana Gloria One Health case study neglected disease surveillance evaluation cysticercosis, |
title_short |
One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal |
title_full |
One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal |
title_fullStr |
One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal |
title_full_unstemmed |
One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal |
title_sort |
One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal |
author |
Fonseca, Ana Gloria |
author_facet |
Fonseca, Ana Gloria Torgal, Jorge de Meneghi, Daniele Gabriël, Sarah Coelho, Ana Cláudia Vilhena, Manuela |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Torgal, Jorge de Meneghi, Daniele Gabriël, Sarah Coelho, Ana Cláudia Vilhena, Manuela |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fonseca, Ana Gloria Torgal, Jorge de Meneghi, Daniele Gabriël, Sarah Coelho, Ana Cláudia Vilhena, Manuela Vilhena, Manuela |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
One Health case study neglected disease surveillance evaluation cysticercosis, |
topic |
One Health case study neglected disease surveillance evaluation cysticercosis, |
description |
The increasing occurrence of human cysticercosis, a zoonotic neglected disease, is challenging the traditional prevention and control paradigm and calling for One Health (OH) solutions in industrialized countries. OH solutions for health interventions are increasingly being used to capture expected and unexpected outcomes across people, animals and the environment. The Network for One Health Evaluation (NEOH) proposes an evidence-based framework, relying on systems and mixed methods approaches to evaluate the One Healthness. In this case study, this tool is used to evaluate the design of the Observatory of Taeniasis and Cysticercosis, as an example of inter-sectorial collaboration for surveillance in Portugal. The OH initiative (drivers, expected outcomes) and its system (boundaries, aim, dimensions, actors, stakeholders) were described. The different aspects of this initiative were scored with values from 0 (=no OH approach) to 1 (=perfect OH approach). The OH index was 0.31. Its OH ratio is 1.98. Overall scores were: OH thinking 0.75; OH planning 0.60; OH working 0.60; OH sharing 0.35; OH learning 0.50 and Systemic organization 0.50. Operational levels of the Initiative are the main strengths, indicating a comprehensive multidimensional innovative approach and transdisciplinarity. Critical issues in the supporting infrastructure were observed, related to communication, learning and organizational gaps in the project, with the evaluation being conducted as the project is being designed and implemented. The strengths and weaknesses detected may be used to refine the initiative. This case study therefore exemplifies and supports OH assessment also for ongoing projects, at design and early implementation stages for guiding and guaranteeing a OH oriented perspective. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-04-30T14:06:11Z 2018-04-30 2018-03-13T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/23141 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/23141 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00074 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/23141 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00074 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Fonseca AG, Torgal J, de Meneghi D, Gabriël S, Coelho AC and Vilhena M (2018) One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal. Front. Public Health 6:74. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00074 2296-2565 https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00074 anagloriafonseca@gmail.com jorgetorgal@gmail.com daniele.demeneghi@unito.it sarah.gabriel@ugent.be accoelho@utad.pt mmcv@uevora.pt nd 239 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers in Public Health |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers in Public Health |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136621221642240 |