One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fonseca, Ana Gloria
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Torgal, Jorge, de Meneghi, Daniele, Gabriël, Sarah, Coelho, Ana Cláudia, Vilhena, Manuela
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/23141
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00074
Resumo: The increasing occurrence of human cysticercosis, a zoonotic neglected disease, is challenging the traditional prevention and control paradigm and calling for One Health (OH) solutions in industrialized countries. OH solutions for health interventions are increasingly being used to capture expected and unexpected outcomes across people, animals and the environment. The Network for One Health Evaluation (NEOH) proposes an evidence-based framework, relying on systems and mixed methods approaches to evaluate the One Healthness. In this case study, this tool is used to evaluate the design of the Observatory of Taeniasis and Cysticercosis, as an example of inter-sectorial collaboration for surveillance in Portugal. The OH initiative (drivers, expected outcomes) and its system (boundaries, aim, dimensions, actors, stakeholders) were described. The different aspects of this initiative were scored with values from 0 (=no OH approach) to 1 (=perfect OH approach). The OH index was 0.31. Its OH ratio is 1.98. Overall scores were: OH thinking 0.75; OH planning 0.60; OH working 0.60; OH sharing 0.35; OH learning 0.50 and Systemic organization 0.50. Operational levels of the Initiative are the main strengths, indicating a comprehensive multidimensional innovative approach and transdisciplinarity. Critical issues in the supporting infrastructure were observed, related to communication, learning and organizational gaps in the project, with the evaluation being conducted as the project is being designed and implemented. The strengths and weaknesses detected may be used to refine the initiative. This case study therefore exemplifies and supports OH assessment also for ongoing projects, at design and early implementation stages for guiding and guaranteeing a OH oriented perspective.
id RCAP_2f65082ed7e94afb1568159d45a02cf4
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/23141
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in PortugalOne Healthcase studyneglected diseasesurveillanceevaluationcysticercosis,The increasing occurrence of human cysticercosis, a zoonotic neglected disease, is challenging the traditional prevention and control paradigm and calling for One Health (OH) solutions in industrialized countries. OH solutions for health interventions are increasingly being used to capture expected and unexpected outcomes across people, animals and the environment. The Network for One Health Evaluation (NEOH) proposes an evidence-based framework, relying on systems and mixed methods approaches to evaluate the One Healthness. In this case study, this tool is used to evaluate the design of the Observatory of Taeniasis and Cysticercosis, as an example of inter-sectorial collaboration for surveillance in Portugal. The OH initiative (drivers, expected outcomes) and its system (boundaries, aim, dimensions, actors, stakeholders) were described. The different aspects of this initiative were scored with values from 0 (=no OH approach) to 1 (=perfect OH approach). The OH index was 0.31. Its OH ratio is 1.98. Overall scores were: OH thinking 0.75; OH planning 0.60; OH working 0.60; OH sharing 0.35; OH learning 0.50 and Systemic organization 0.50. Operational levels of the Initiative are the main strengths, indicating a comprehensive multidimensional innovative approach and transdisciplinarity. Critical issues in the supporting infrastructure were observed, related to communication, learning and organizational gaps in the project, with the evaluation being conducted as the project is being designed and implemented. The strengths and weaknesses detected may be used to refine the initiative. This case study therefore exemplifies and supports OH assessment also for ongoing projects, at design and early implementation stages for guiding and guaranteeing a OH oriented perspective.Frontiers in Public Health2018-04-30T14:06:11Z2018-04-302018-03-13T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/23141http://hdl.handle.net/10174/23141https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00074engFonseca AG, Torgal J, de Meneghi D, Gabriël S, Coelho AC and Vilhena M (2018) One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal. Front. Public Health 6:74. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.000742296-2565https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00074anagloriafonseca@gmail.comjorgetorgal@gmail.comdaniele.demeneghi@unito.itsarah.gabriel@ugent.beaccoelho@utad.ptmmcv@uevora.ptnd239Fonseca, Ana GloriaTorgal, Jorgede Meneghi, DanieleGabriël, SarahCoelho, Ana CláudiaVilhena, ManuelaVilhena, Manuelainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:14:50Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/23141Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:13:56.270788Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal
title One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal
spellingShingle One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal
Fonseca, Ana Gloria
One Health
case study
neglected disease
surveillance
evaluation
cysticercosis,
title_short One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal
title_full One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal
title_fullStr One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal
title_full_unstemmed One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal
title_sort One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal
author Fonseca, Ana Gloria
author_facet Fonseca, Ana Gloria
Torgal, Jorge
de Meneghi, Daniele
Gabriël, Sarah
Coelho, Ana Cláudia
Vilhena, Manuela
author_role author
author2 Torgal, Jorge
de Meneghi, Daniele
Gabriël, Sarah
Coelho, Ana Cláudia
Vilhena, Manuela
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fonseca, Ana Gloria
Torgal, Jorge
de Meneghi, Daniele
Gabriël, Sarah
Coelho, Ana Cláudia
Vilhena, Manuela
Vilhena, Manuela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv One Health
case study
neglected disease
surveillance
evaluation
cysticercosis,
topic One Health
case study
neglected disease
surveillance
evaluation
cysticercosis,
description The increasing occurrence of human cysticercosis, a zoonotic neglected disease, is challenging the traditional prevention and control paradigm and calling for One Health (OH) solutions in industrialized countries. OH solutions for health interventions are increasingly being used to capture expected and unexpected outcomes across people, animals and the environment. The Network for One Health Evaluation (NEOH) proposes an evidence-based framework, relying on systems and mixed methods approaches to evaluate the One Healthness. In this case study, this tool is used to evaluate the design of the Observatory of Taeniasis and Cysticercosis, as an example of inter-sectorial collaboration for surveillance in Portugal. The OH initiative (drivers, expected outcomes) and its system (boundaries, aim, dimensions, actors, stakeholders) were described. The different aspects of this initiative were scored with values from 0 (=no OH approach) to 1 (=perfect OH approach). The OH index was 0.31. Its OH ratio is 1.98. Overall scores were: OH thinking 0.75; OH planning 0.60; OH working 0.60; OH sharing 0.35; OH learning 0.50 and Systemic organization 0.50. Operational levels of the Initiative are the main strengths, indicating a comprehensive multidimensional innovative approach and transdisciplinarity. Critical issues in the supporting infrastructure were observed, related to communication, learning and organizational gaps in the project, with the evaluation being conducted as the project is being designed and implemented. The strengths and weaknesses detected may be used to refine the initiative. This case study therefore exemplifies and supports OH assessment also for ongoing projects, at design and early implementation stages for guiding and guaranteeing a OH oriented perspective.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-04-30T14:06:11Z
2018-04-30
2018-03-13T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10174/23141
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/23141
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00074
url http://hdl.handle.net/10174/23141
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00074
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Fonseca AG, Torgal J, de Meneghi D, Gabriël S, Coelho AC and Vilhena M (2018) One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal. Front. Public Health 6:74. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00074
2296-2565
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00074
anagloriafonseca@gmail.com
jorgetorgal@gmail.com
daniele.demeneghi@unito.it
sarah.gabriel@ugent.be
accoelho@utad.pt
mmcv@uevora.pt
nd
239
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers in Public Health
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers in Public Health
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136621221642240