Prevalência da colonização por Streptococcus do grupo B nas grávidas do CHUSJ
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://hdl.handle.net/10216/128917 |
Resumo: | Overview and Aims: Colonized pregnant women with group B Streptococcus (GBS), are generally asymptomatic, but GBS can cause urinary tract infection, as well as amnionitis, endometritis and bacteraemia. It is also associated with an increased risk of preterm birth and fetal death. In the newborn, GBS is the main cause of infection, which can lead to neonatal GBS early-onset disease (EOD) or late-onset disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of GBS colonization in pregnant women, and to assess differences between groups, risk factors for colonization, and the occurrence of EOD. Study Design, Population and Methods: An observational, retrospective and descriptive study was carried out in pregnant women who had deliveries between January 2013 and September 2019. We evaluated demographic and clinical variables obtain from electronic files. The pregnant women were divided into two groups, colonized by GBS and not colonized by GBS. Descriptive analyses of the study variables and statistical tests were performed to assess risk factors for GBS colonization and to compare means and distributions between colonized and non-colonized pregnant women. Results: A total of 12,315 cases were included in the study, of which 2,211 pregnant women were colonized by the SGB, which corresponds to a prevalence of 18% (95% CI: 17.3 - 18.6). Differences were found for maternal age, educational levels, previous births and pregnancies, weight gain during pregnancy and gestational age. An association was found between urinary infections during pregnancy and colonization. We found a prevalence of neonatal GBS EOD of 2.3 per 1000 live births in the colonized group. Conclusions: The prevalence of GBS colonization is similar to that previously reported. The prevalence of EOD in colonized pregnant women is also in accordance with other studies, reflecting the universal screening for GBS and antibiotic prophylaxis. |
id |
RCAP_2f7b8f7524cf9c84f52e3931bcdf799c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/128917 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Prevalência da colonização por Streptococcus do grupo B nas grávidas do CHUSJMedicina clínicaClinical medicineOverview and Aims: Colonized pregnant women with group B Streptococcus (GBS), are generally asymptomatic, but GBS can cause urinary tract infection, as well as amnionitis, endometritis and bacteraemia. It is also associated with an increased risk of preterm birth and fetal death. In the newborn, GBS is the main cause of infection, which can lead to neonatal GBS early-onset disease (EOD) or late-onset disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of GBS colonization in pregnant women, and to assess differences between groups, risk factors for colonization, and the occurrence of EOD. Study Design, Population and Methods: An observational, retrospective and descriptive study was carried out in pregnant women who had deliveries between January 2013 and September 2019. We evaluated demographic and clinical variables obtain from electronic files. The pregnant women were divided into two groups, colonized by GBS and not colonized by GBS. Descriptive analyses of the study variables and statistical tests were performed to assess risk factors for GBS colonization and to compare means and distributions between colonized and non-colonized pregnant women. Results: A total of 12,315 cases were included in the study, of which 2,211 pregnant women were colonized by the SGB, which corresponds to a prevalence of 18% (95% CI: 17.3 - 18.6). Differences were found for maternal age, educational levels, previous births and pregnancies, weight gain during pregnancy and gestational age. An association was found between urinary infections during pregnancy and colonization. We found a prevalence of neonatal GBS EOD of 2.3 per 1000 live births in the colonized group. Conclusions: The prevalence of GBS colonization is similar to that previously reported. The prevalence of EOD in colonized pregnant women is also in accordance with other studies, reflecting the universal screening for GBS and antibiotic prophylaxis.2020-05-142020-05-14T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/128917TID:202617947porRicardo Manuel Azevedo dos Santosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T13:19:18Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/128917Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:38:26.594385Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Prevalência da colonização por Streptococcus do grupo B nas grávidas do CHUSJ |
title |
Prevalência da colonização por Streptococcus do grupo B nas grávidas do CHUSJ |
spellingShingle |
Prevalência da colonização por Streptococcus do grupo B nas grávidas do CHUSJ Ricardo Manuel Azevedo dos Santos Medicina clínica Clinical medicine |
title_short |
Prevalência da colonização por Streptococcus do grupo B nas grávidas do CHUSJ |
title_full |
Prevalência da colonização por Streptococcus do grupo B nas grávidas do CHUSJ |
title_fullStr |
Prevalência da colonização por Streptococcus do grupo B nas grávidas do CHUSJ |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prevalência da colonização por Streptococcus do grupo B nas grávidas do CHUSJ |
title_sort |
Prevalência da colonização por Streptococcus do grupo B nas grávidas do CHUSJ |
author |
Ricardo Manuel Azevedo dos Santos |
author_facet |
Ricardo Manuel Azevedo dos Santos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ricardo Manuel Azevedo dos Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Medicina clínica Clinical medicine |
topic |
Medicina clínica Clinical medicine |
description |
Overview and Aims: Colonized pregnant women with group B Streptococcus (GBS), are generally asymptomatic, but GBS can cause urinary tract infection, as well as amnionitis, endometritis and bacteraemia. It is also associated with an increased risk of preterm birth and fetal death. In the newborn, GBS is the main cause of infection, which can lead to neonatal GBS early-onset disease (EOD) or late-onset disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of GBS colonization in pregnant women, and to assess differences between groups, risk factors for colonization, and the occurrence of EOD. Study Design, Population and Methods: An observational, retrospective and descriptive study was carried out in pregnant women who had deliveries between January 2013 and September 2019. We evaluated demographic and clinical variables obtain from electronic files. The pregnant women were divided into two groups, colonized by GBS and not colonized by GBS. Descriptive analyses of the study variables and statistical tests were performed to assess risk factors for GBS colonization and to compare means and distributions between colonized and non-colonized pregnant women. Results: A total of 12,315 cases were included in the study, of which 2,211 pregnant women were colonized by the SGB, which corresponds to a prevalence of 18% (95% CI: 17.3 - 18.6). Differences were found for maternal age, educational levels, previous births and pregnancies, weight gain during pregnancy and gestational age. An association was found between urinary infections during pregnancy and colonization. We found a prevalence of neonatal GBS EOD of 2.3 per 1000 live births in the colonized group. Conclusions: The prevalence of GBS colonization is similar to that previously reported. The prevalence of EOD in colonized pregnant women is also in accordance with other studies, reflecting the universal screening for GBS and antibiotic prophylaxis. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-14 2020-05-14T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/128917 TID:202617947 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/128917 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:202617947 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799135698005000192 |