Prevalência da colonização por Streptococcus do grupo B nas grávidas do CHUSJ

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ricardo Manuel Azevedo dos Santos
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/128917
Resumo: Overview and Aims: Colonized pregnant women with group B Streptococcus (GBS), are generally asymptomatic, but GBS can cause urinary tract infection, as well as amnionitis, endometritis and bacteraemia. It is also associated with an increased risk of preterm birth and fetal death. In the newborn, GBS is the main cause of infection, which can lead to neonatal GBS early-onset disease (EOD) or late-onset disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of GBS colonization in pregnant women, and to assess differences between groups, risk factors for colonization, and the occurrence of EOD. Study Design, Population and Methods: An observational, retrospective and descriptive study was carried out in pregnant women who had deliveries between January 2013 and September 2019. We evaluated demographic and clinical variables obtain from electronic files. The pregnant women were divided into two groups, colonized by GBS and not colonized by GBS. Descriptive analyses of the study variables and statistical tests were performed to assess risk factors for GBS colonization and to compare means and distributions between colonized and non-colonized pregnant women. Results: A total of 12,315 cases were included in the study, of which 2,211 pregnant women were colonized by the SGB, which corresponds to a prevalence of 18% (95% CI: 17.3 - 18.6). Differences were found for maternal age, educational levels, previous births and pregnancies, weight gain during pregnancy and gestational age. An association was found between urinary infections during pregnancy and colonization. We found a prevalence of neonatal GBS EOD of 2.3 per 1000 live births in the colonized group. Conclusions: The prevalence of GBS colonization is similar to that previously reported. The prevalence of EOD in colonized pregnant women is also in accordance with other studies, reflecting the universal screening for GBS and antibiotic prophylaxis.
id RCAP_2f7b8f7524cf9c84f52e3931bcdf799c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/128917
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Prevalência da colonização por Streptococcus do grupo B nas grávidas do CHUSJMedicina clínicaClinical medicineOverview and Aims: Colonized pregnant women with group B Streptococcus (GBS), are generally asymptomatic, but GBS can cause urinary tract infection, as well as amnionitis, endometritis and bacteraemia. It is also associated with an increased risk of preterm birth and fetal death. In the newborn, GBS is the main cause of infection, which can lead to neonatal GBS early-onset disease (EOD) or late-onset disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of GBS colonization in pregnant women, and to assess differences between groups, risk factors for colonization, and the occurrence of EOD. Study Design, Population and Methods: An observational, retrospective and descriptive study was carried out in pregnant women who had deliveries between January 2013 and September 2019. We evaluated demographic and clinical variables obtain from electronic files. The pregnant women were divided into two groups, colonized by GBS and not colonized by GBS. Descriptive analyses of the study variables and statistical tests were performed to assess risk factors for GBS colonization and to compare means and distributions between colonized and non-colonized pregnant women. Results: A total of 12,315 cases were included in the study, of which 2,211 pregnant women were colonized by the SGB, which corresponds to a prevalence of 18% (95% CI: 17.3 - 18.6). Differences were found for maternal age, educational levels, previous births and pregnancies, weight gain during pregnancy and gestational age. An association was found between urinary infections during pregnancy and colonization. We found a prevalence of neonatal GBS EOD of 2.3 per 1000 live births in the colonized group. Conclusions: The prevalence of GBS colonization is similar to that previously reported. The prevalence of EOD in colonized pregnant women is also in accordance with other studies, reflecting the universal screening for GBS and antibiotic prophylaxis.2020-05-142020-05-14T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/128917TID:202617947porRicardo Manuel Azevedo dos Santosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T13:19:18Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/128917Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:38:26.594385Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prevalência da colonização por Streptococcus do grupo B nas grávidas do CHUSJ
title Prevalência da colonização por Streptococcus do grupo B nas grávidas do CHUSJ
spellingShingle Prevalência da colonização por Streptococcus do grupo B nas grávidas do CHUSJ
Ricardo Manuel Azevedo dos Santos
Medicina clínica
Clinical medicine
title_short Prevalência da colonização por Streptococcus do grupo B nas grávidas do CHUSJ
title_full Prevalência da colonização por Streptococcus do grupo B nas grávidas do CHUSJ
title_fullStr Prevalência da colonização por Streptococcus do grupo B nas grávidas do CHUSJ
title_full_unstemmed Prevalência da colonização por Streptococcus do grupo B nas grávidas do CHUSJ
title_sort Prevalência da colonização por Streptococcus do grupo B nas grávidas do CHUSJ
author Ricardo Manuel Azevedo dos Santos
author_facet Ricardo Manuel Azevedo dos Santos
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ricardo Manuel Azevedo dos Santos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Medicina clínica
Clinical medicine
topic Medicina clínica
Clinical medicine
description Overview and Aims: Colonized pregnant women with group B Streptococcus (GBS), are generally asymptomatic, but GBS can cause urinary tract infection, as well as amnionitis, endometritis and bacteraemia. It is also associated with an increased risk of preterm birth and fetal death. In the newborn, GBS is the main cause of infection, which can lead to neonatal GBS early-onset disease (EOD) or late-onset disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of GBS colonization in pregnant women, and to assess differences between groups, risk factors for colonization, and the occurrence of EOD. Study Design, Population and Methods: An observational, retrospective and descriptive study was carried out in pregnant women who had deliveries between January 2013 and September 2019. We evaluated demographic and clinical variables obtain from electronic files. The pregnant women were divided into two groups, colonized by GBS and not colonized by GBS. Descriptive analyses of the study variables and statistical tests were performed to assess risk factors for GBS colonization and to compare means and distributions between colonized and non-colonized pregnant women. Results: A total of 12,315 cases were included in the study, of which 2,211 pregnant women were colonized by the SGB, which corresponds to a prevalence of 18% (95% CI: 17.3 - 18.6). Differences were found for maternal age, educational levels, previous births and pregnancies, weight gain during pregnancy and gestational age. An association was found between urinary infections during pregnancy and colonization. We found a prevalence of neonatal GBS EOD of 2.3 per 1000 live births in the colonized group. Conclusions: The prevalence of GBS colonization is similar to that previously reported. The prevalence of EOD in colonized pregnant women is also in accordance with other studies, reflecting the universal screening for GBS and antibiotic prophylaxis.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-14
2020-05-14T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10216/128917
TID:202617947
url https://hdl.handle.net/10216/128917
identifier_str_mv TID:202617947
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135698005000192