New Urbanism in the New Urban Agenda: Threads of an Unfinished Reformation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mehaffy, Michael W.
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Haas, Tigran
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3371
Resumo: We present evidence that New Urbanism, defined as a set of normative urban characteristics codified in the 1996 Charter of the New Urbanism, reached a seminal moment—in mission if not in name—with the 2016 New Urban Agenda, a landmark document adopted by acclamation by all 193 member states of the United Nations. We compare the two documents and find key parallels between them (including mix of uses, walkable multi-modal streets, buildings defining public space, mix of building ages and heritage patterns, co-production of the city by the citizens, and understanding of the city as an evolutionary self-organizing structure). Both documents also reveal striking contrasts with the highly influential 20th century Athens Charter, from 1933, developed by the Congrès Internationaux d’Architecture Moderne. Yet, both newer documents also still face formidable barriers to implementation, and, as we argue, each faces similar challenges in formulating effective alternatives to business as usual. We trace this history up to the present day, and the necessary requirements for what we conclude is an ‘unfinished reformation’ ahead.
id RCAP_303b2883a90909b4ac30b27f933c1717
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3371
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling New Urbanism in the New Urban Agenda: Threads of an Unfinished ReformationAthens Charter; Charter of the New Urbanism; New Urban Agenda; new urbanism; sustainable urbanismWe present evidence that New Urbanism, defined as a set of normative urban characteristics codified in the 1996 Charter of the New Urbanism, reached a seminal moment—in mission if not in name—with the 2016 New Urban Agenda, a landmark document adopted by acclamation by all 193 member states of the United Nations. We compare the two documents and find key parallels between them (including mix of uses, walkable multi-modal streets, buildings defining public space, mix of building ages and heritage patterns, co-production of the city by the citizens, and understanding of the city as an evolutionary self-organizing structure). Both documents also reveal striking contrasts with the highly influential 20th century Athens Charter, from 1933, developed by the Congrès Internationaux d’Architecture Moderne. Yet, both newer documents also still face formidable barriers to implementation, and, as we argue, each faces similar challenges in formulating effective alternatives to business as usual. We trace this history up to the present day, and the necessary requirements for what we conclude is an ‘unfinished reformation’ ahead.Cogitatio2020-12-22info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3371oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3371Urban Planning; Vol 5, No 4 (2020): New Urbanism: From Exception to Norm—The Evolution of a Global Movement; 441-4522183-7635reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/3371https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3371https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/3371/3371Copyright (c) 2020 Michael W. Mehaffy, Tigran Haashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMehaffy, Michael W.Haas, Tigran2022-12-20T11:00:14Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3371Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:07.460979Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv New Urbanism in the New Urban Agenda: Threads of an Unfinished Reformation
title New Urbanism in the New Urban Agenda: Threads of an Unfinished Reformation
spellingShingle New Urbanism in the New Urban Agenda: Threads of an Unfinished Reformation
Mehaffy, Michael W.
Athens Charter; Charter of the New Urbanism; New Urban Agenda; new urbanism; sustainable urbanism
title_short New Urbanism in the New Urban Agenda: Threads of an Unfinished Reformation
title_full New Urbanism in the New Urban Agenda: Threads of an Unfinished Reformation
title_fullStr New Urbanism in the New Urban Agenda: Threads of an Unfinished Reformation
title_full_unstemmed New Urbanism in the New Urban Agenda: Threads of an Unfinished Reformation
title_sort New Urbanism in the New Urban Agenda: Threads of an Unfinished Reformation
author Mehaffy, Michael W.
author_facet Mehaffy, Michael W.
Haas, Tigran
author_role author
author2 Haas, Tigran
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mehaffy, Michael W.
Haas, Tigran
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Athens Charter; Charter of the New Urbanism; New Urban Agenda; new urbanism; sustainable urbanism
topic Athens Charter; Charter of the New Urbanism; New Urban Agenda; new urbanism; sustainable urbanism
description We present evidence that New Urbanism, defined as a set of normative urban characteristics codified in the 1996 Charter of the New Urbanism, reached a seminal moment—in mission if not in name—with the 2016 New Urban Agenda, a landmark document adopted by acclamation by all 193 member states of the United Nations. We compare the two documents and find key parallels between them (including mix of uses, walkable multi-modal streets, buildings defining public space, mix of building ages and heritage patterns, co-production of the city by the citizens, and understanding of the city as an evolutionary self-organizing structure). Both documents also reveal striking contrasts with the highly influential 20th century Athens Charter, from 1933, developed by the Congrès Internationaux d’Architecture Moderne. Yet, both newer documents also still face formidable barriers to implementation, and, as we argue, each faces similar challenges in formulating effective alternatives to business as usual. We trace this history up to the present day, and the necessary requirements for what we conclude is an ‘unfinished reformation’ ahead.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-22
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3371
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3371
url https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3371
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3371
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/3371
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3371
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/3371/3371
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Michael W. Mehaffy, Tigran Haas
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Michael W. Mehaffy, Tigran Haas
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Urban Planning; Vol 5, No 4 (2020): New Urbanism: From Exception to Norm—The Evolution of a Global Movement; 441-452
2183-7635
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130667317985280