Developing social capital in implementing a complex intervention
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
| Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
| Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/117472 |
Resumo: | We would like to thank Katrin Gottlebe who has provided excellent project management for the OSPI-Europe consortium and Patrizia Torremante of Gabo-mi for the tremendous organisational support so essential to keeping such a large European study on track. We would also like to acknowledge Eve Griffin for some assistance with data collection and Ruth Harris for the design of Figure 1. This research received funding from OSPI-Europe as part of the European Community's Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement 223138. The views are those of the authors and the funding body was not involved in the conception or design of this study. We wish to thank everyone who participated in interviews and focus groups for this study. |
| id |
RCAP_3064706897e96492759a27f5bc5866e6 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:run.unl.pt:10362/117472 |
| network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
| network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
| repository_id_str |
7160 |
| spelling |
Developing social capital in implementing a complex interventionA process evaluation of the early implementation of a suicide prevention intervention in four European countriesAdvisory groupsComplex interventionsProcess evaluationRealist evaluationSocial capitalSuicide preventionPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingWe would like to thank Katrin Gottlebe who has provided excellent project management for the OSPI-Europe consortium and Patrizia Torremante of Gabo-mi for the tremendous organisational support so essential to keeping such a large European study on track. We would also like to acknowledge Eve Griffin for some assistance with data collection and Ruth Harris for the design of Figure 1. This research received funding from OSPI-Europe as part of the European Community's Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement 223138. The views are those of the authors and the funding body was not involved in the conception or design of this study. We wish to thank everyone who participated in interviews and focus groups for this study.Background: Variation in the implementation of complex multilevel interventions can impact on their delivery and outcomes. Few suicide prevention interventions, especially multilevel interventions, have included evaluation of both the process of implementation as well as outcomes. Such evaluation is essential for the replication of interventions, for interpreting and understanding outcomes, and for improving implementation science. This paper reports on a process evaluation of the early implementation stage of an optimised suicide prevention programme (OSPI-Europe) implemented in four European countries. Methods. The process analysis was conducted within the framework of a realist evaluation methodology, and involved case studies of the process of implementation in four European countries. Datasets include: repeated questionnaires to track progress of implementation including delivery of individual activities and their intensity; serial interviews and focus groups with stakeholder groups; and detailed observations at OSPI implementation team meetings. Results: Analysis of local contexts in each of the four countries revealed that the advisory group was a key mechanism that had a substantial impact on the ease of implementation of OSPI interventions, particularly on their ability to recruit to training interventions. However, simply recruiting representatives of key organisations into an advisory group is not sufficient to achieve impact on the delivery of interventions. In order to maximise the potential of high level gatekeepers, it is necessary to first transform them into OSPI stakeholders. Motivations for OSPI participation as a stakeholder included: personal affinity with the shared goals and target groups within OSPI; the complementary and participatory nature of OSPI that adds value to pre-existing suicide prevention initiatives; and reciprocal reward for participants through access to the extended network capacity that organisations could accrue for themselves and their organisations from participation in OSPI. Conclusions: Exploring the role of advisory groups and the meaning of participation for these participants revealed some key areas for best practice in implementation: careful planning of the composition of the advisory group to access target groups; the importance of establishing common goals; the importance of acknowledging and complementing existing experience and activity; and facilitating an equivalence of benefit from network participation.Centro de Estudos de Doenças Crónicas (CEDOC)NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM)RUNHarris, Fiona M.Maxwell, MargaretOconnor, Rory C.Coyne, JamesArensman, EllaSzékely, AndrásGusmão, RicardoCoffey, ClaireCosta, SusanaCserháti, ZoltanKoburger, NicoleVan Audenhove, ChantalMcDaid, DavidMaloney, JuliaVärnik, PeeterHegerl, Ulrich2021-05-10T23:15:27Z2013-022013-02-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/117472engPURE: 29658903https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-158info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T05:00:33Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/117472Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:43:37.183757Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Developing social capital in implementing a complex intervention A process evaluation of the early implementation of a suicide prevention intervention in four European countries |
| title |
Developing social capital in implementing a complex intervention |
| spellingShingle |
Developing social capital in implementing a complex intervention Harris, Fiona M. Advisory groups Complex interventions Process evaluation Realist evaluation Social capital Suicide prevention Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being |
| title_short |
Developing social capital in implementing a complex intervention |
| title_full |
Developing social capital in implementing a complex intervention |
| title_fullStr |
Developing social capital in implementing a complex intervention |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Developing social capital in implementing a complex intervention |
| title_sort |
Developing social capital in implementing a complex intervention |
| author |
Harris, Fiona M. |
| author_facet |
Harris, Fiona M. Maxwell, Margaret Oconnor, Rory C. Coyne, James Arensman, Ella Székely, András Gusmão, Ricardo Coffey, Claire Costa, Susana Cserháti, Zoltan Koburger, Nicole Van Audenhove, Chantal McDaid, David Maloney, Julia Värnik, Peeter Hegerl, Ulrich |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Maxwell, Margaret Oconnor, Rory C. Coyne, James Arensman, Ella Székely, András Gusmão, Ricardo Coffey, Claire Costa, Susana Cserháti, Zoltan Koburger, Nicole Van Audenhove, Chantal McDaid, David Maloney, Julia Värnik, Peeter Hegerl, Ulrich |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Estudos de Doenças Crónicas (CEDOC) NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM) RUN |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Harris, Fiona M. Maxwell, Margaret Oconnor, Rory C. Coyne, James Arensman, Ella Székely, András Gusmão, Ricardo Coffey, Claire Costa, Susana Cserháti, Zoltan Koburger, Nicole Van Audenhove, Chantal McDaid, David Maloney, Julia Värnik, Peeter Hegerl, Ulrich |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Advisory groups Complex interventions Process evaluation Realist evaluation Social capital Suicide prevention Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being |
| topic |
Advisory groups Complex interventions Process evaluation Realist evaluation Social capital Suicide prevention Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being |
| description |
We would like to thank Katrin Gottlebe who has provided excellent project management for the OSPI-Europe consortium and Patrizia Torremante of Gabo-mi for the tremendous organisational support so essential to keeping such a large European study on track. We would also like to acknowledge Eve Griffin for some assistance with data collection and Ruth Harris for the design of Figure 1. This research received funding from OSPI-Europe as part of the European Community's Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement 223138. The views are those of the authors and the funding body was not involved in the conception or design of this study. We wish to thank everyone who participated in interviews and focus groups for this study. |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-02 2013-02-01T00:00:00Z 2021-05-10T23:15:27Z |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/117472 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/117472 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
PURE: 29658903 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-158 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
| instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
| instacron_str |
RCAAP |
| institution |
RCAAP |
| reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
| collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1799138045384982528 |