“I can give you nothing else but my blood”: an analysis of the construction of ethos
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red10a3 |
Resumo: | In 1954, Brazil, then governed by President Getúlio Vargas, was undergoing a major political crisis. The military leadership and political opponents demanded the president’s resignation. However, before being deposed, Getúlio Vargas took his own life by shooting himself in the chest. To the Brazilian people, he left a typewritten letter that was found next to his body. The “testament letter”, as it became known, made clear the reason for the suicide and transformed Getúlio Vargas into a martyr and hero of the Brazilian people. Years after his fateful death, a second letter was made public, handwritten and much more concise than the first. While many believe that the handwritten letter is the true “testament letter”, no studies of this second letter have been found in linguistics. Thus, to fill such a gap, this work seeks to analyse the two letters and present the different linguistic-discursive strategies used by the author in the construction of ethos. As theoretical assumptions, we will use the framework of textual genre analysis proposed by Adam (2001) and some concepts of ethos proposed by Amossy (2019) and Maingueneau (2007; 2019). Our study proves how important the “testament letter” was in the construction of Getúlio Vargas’ image. It also shows that there are some significant differences in the linguistic-discursive strategies used by the author in the two letters. The martyr image is present in both letters. However, in the handwritten letter, the author constructs the image of someone who wants to be forgotten in his own country. In contrast, in the testament letter, the author builds the image of a hero who does not wish to be forgotten by the Brazilian people. |
id |
RCAP_316124692683eb70a96d91443a9dca60 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.letras.up.pt/ojs:article/10936 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
“I can give you nothing else but my blood”: an analysis of the construction of ethos“Nada mais vos posso dar, a não ser meu sangue”: uma análise sobre a construção do ethosGênero textualCarta de suicídioGetúlio VargasEthosTextual GenreSuicide noteGetúlio VargasEthosIn 1954, Brazil, then governed by President Getúlio Vargas, was undergoing a major political crisis. The military leadership and political opponents demanded the president’s resignation. However, before being deposed, Getúlio Vargas took his own life by shooting himself in the chest. To the Brazilian people, he left a typewritten letter that was found next to his body. The “testament letter”, as it became known, made clear the reason for the suicide and transformed Getúlio Vargas into a martyr and hero of the Brazilian people. Years after his fateful death, a second letter was made public, handwritten and much more concise than the first. While many believe that the handwritten letter is the true “testament letter”, no studies of this second letter have been found in linguistics. Thus, to fill such a gap, this work seeks to analyse the two letters and present the different linguistic-discursive strategies used by the author in the construction of ethos. As theoretical assumptions, we will use the framework of textual genre analysis proposed by Adam (2001) and some concepts of ethos proposed by Amossy (2019) and Maingueneau (2007; 2019). Our study proves how important the “testament letter” was in the construction of Getúlio Vargas’ image. It also shows that there are some significant differences in the linguistic-discursive strategies used by the author in the two letters. The martyr image is present in both letters. However, in the handwritten letter, the author constructs the image of someone who wants to be forgotten in his own country. In contrast, in the testament letter, the author builds the image of a hero who does not wish to be forgotten by the Brazilian people.Em 1954, o Brasil, então governado pelo presidente Getúlio Vargas, passava por uma grande crise política. A cúpula militar e os opositores políticos exigiam a renúncia do presidente. Entretanto, antes de ser deposto, Getúlio Vargas tirou sua própria vida com um tiro no peito. Para o povo brasileiro, deixou uma carta datilografada que foi encontrada junto ao seu corpo. A “carta[1]testamento”, como ficou conhecida, deixava clara a razão do suicídio e transformou Getúlio Vargas em mártir e herói do povo brasileiro. Entretanto, anos depois da fatídica morte, foi tornada pública uma segunda carta, manuscrita e muito mais concisa do que a primeira. Embora muitos acred- item que esta seja a verdadeira “carta-testamento”, não foram encontrados estudos acerca dessa segunda carta no âmbito da Linguística. Assim, com o objetivo de preencher tal lacuna, este estudo busca analisar as duas cartas e apresentar as diferentes estratégias linguístico-discursivas utilizadas pelo autor na construção do ethos. Como pressupostos teóricos, utilizaremos o quadro de análise de gêneros textuais proposto por Adam (2001) e alguns conceitos de ethos propostos por Amossy (2019) e Maingueneau (2007; 2019). Nossa análise comprova o quão importante foi o papel da “carta-testamento” na construção da imagem de Getúlio Vargas. No entanto, também mostra que há algumas diferenças significativas nas estratégias linguístico-discursivas presentes nas duas cartas. Por fim, embora a imagem de mártir esteja presente nas duas missivas, observamos que, na carta manuscrita, o autor constrói a imagem de alguém que deseja apenas ficar esquecido no próprio país e, na carta-testamento, a imagem de herói que não quer ser esquecido pelo povo brasileiro.Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso2021-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red10a3https://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red10a3Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; N.º 10 (2021): REDIS: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; 67-982183-395810.21747/21833958/red10reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/10936https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/10936/10010Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Redis: Revista de Estudos do discursoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Viviane2023-12-29T11:15:21Zoai:ojs.letras.up.pt/ojs:article/10936Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:29:35.684051Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
“I can give you nothing else but my blood”: an analysis of the construction of ethos “Nada mais vos posso dar, a não ser meu sangue”: uma análise sobre a construção do ethos |
title |
“I can give you nothing else but my blood”: an analysis of the construction of ethos |
spellingShingle |
“I can give you nothing else but my blood”: an analysis of the construction of ethos Costa, Viviane Gênero textual Carta de suicídio Getúlio Vargas Ethos Textual Genre Suicide note Getúlio Vargas Ethos |
title_short |
“I can give you nothing else but my blood”: an analysis of the construction of ethos |
title_full |
“I can give you nothing else but my blood”: an analysis of the construction of ethos |
title_fullStr |
“I can give you nothing else but my blood”: an analysis of the construction of ethos |
title_full_unstemmed |
“I can give you nothing else but my blood”: an analysis of the construction of ethos |
title_sort |
“I can give you nothing else but my blood”: an analysis of the construction of ethos |
author |
Costa, Viviane |
author_facet |
Costa, Viviane |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Viviane |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Gênero textual Carta de suicídio Getúlio Vargas Ethos Textual Genre Suicide note Getúlio Vargas Ethos |
topic |
Gênero textual Carta de suicídio Getúlio Vargas Ethos Textual Genre Suicide note Getúlio Vargas Ethos |
description |
In 1954, Brazil, then governed by President Getúlio Vargas, was undergoing a major political crisis. The military leadership and political opponents demanded the president’s resignation. However, before being deposed, Getúlio Vargas took his own life by shooting himself in the chest. To the Brazilian people, he left a typewritten letter that was found next to his body. The “testament letter”, as it became known, made clear the reason for the suicide and transformed Getúlio Vargas into a martyr and hero of the Brazilian people. Years after his fateful death, a second letter was made public, handwritten and much more concise than the first. While many believe that the handwritten letter is the true “testament letter”, no studies of this second letter have been found in linguistics. Thus, to fill such a gap, this work seeks to analyse the two letters and present the different linguistic-discursive strategies used by the author in the construction of ethos. As theoretical assumptions, we will use the framework of textual genre analysis proposed by Adam (2001) and some concepts of ethos proposed by Amossy (2019) and Maingueneau (2007; 2019). Our study proves how important the “testament letter” was in the construction of Getúlio Vargas’ image. It also shows that there are some significant differences in the linguistic-discursive strategies used by the author in the two letters. The martyr image is present in both letters. However, in the handwritten letter, the author constructs the image of someone who wants to be forgotten in his own country. In contrast, in the testament letter, the author builds the image of a hero who does not wish to be forgotten by the Brazilian people. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red10a3 https://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red10a3 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red10a3 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/10936 https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/10936/10010 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Redis: Revista de Estudos do discurso info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Redis: Revista de Estudos do discurso |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; N.º 10 (2021): REDIS: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; 67-98 2183-3958 10.21747/21833958/red10 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130753193213952 |