Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the elderly: rationale and specific age-related considerations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barra, Sérgio
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Providência, Rui, Paiva, Luís, Heck, Patrick, Agarwal, Sharad
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/1907
Resumo: Despite the increasingly high rate of implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in elderly patients, data supporting their clinical and cost-effectiveness in this age stratum are ambiguous and contradictory. We comprehensively reviewed the state-of-the-art data regarding the applicability, safety, clinical- and cost-effectiveness of the ICD in elderly patients, and analysed which patients in this age stratum are more likely to get a survival benefit from this therapy. Although peri-procedural risk may be slightly higher in the elderly, this procedure is still relatively safe in this age group. In terms of correcting potentially life-threatening arrhythmias, the effectiveness of ICD therapy is comparable in older and younger individuals. However, the assumption of persistent ICD benefit in the elderly population is questionable, as any advantage of the device on arrhythmic death may be largely attenuated by a higher total non-arrhythmic mortality. While septuagenarians and octogenarians have higher annual all-cause mortality rates, ICD therapy may remain effective in highly selected patients at high risk of arrhythmic death and with minimum comorbidities despite advanced age. ICD intervention among the elderly, as a group, may not be cost-effective, but the procedure may reach cost-effectiveness in those expected to live >5-7 years after implantation. Biological age rather than chronological age per se should be the decisive factor in making a decision on ICD selection for survival benefit.
id RCAP_31fad285b3f09e4a1e8fe30727145c04
oai_identifier_str oai:rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt:10400.4/1907
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the elderly: rationale and specific age-related considerationsArritmias CardíacasDesfibrilhadores implantáveisTerapia de Ressincronização CardíacaSelecção de DoentesDespite the increasingly high rate of implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in elderly patients, data supporting their clinical and cost-effectiveness in this age stratum are ambiguous and contradictory. We comprehensively reviewed the state-of-the-art data regarding the applicability, safety, clinical- and cost-effectiveness of the ICD in elderly patients, and analysed which patients in this age stratum are more likely to get a survival benefit from this therapy. Although peri-procedural risk may be slightly higher in the elderly, this procedure is still relatively safe in this age group. In terms of correcting potentially life-threatening arrhythmias, the effectiveness of ICD therapy is comparable in older and younger individuals. However, the assumption of persistent ICD benefit in the elderly population is questionable, as any advantage of the device on arrhythmic death may be largely attenuated by a higher total non-arrhythmic mortality. While septuagenarians and octogenarians have higher annual all-cause mortality rates, ICD therapy may remain effective in highly selected patients at high risk of arrhythmic death and with minimum comorbidities despite advanced age. ICD intervention among the elderly, as a group, may not be cost-effective, but the procedure may reach cost-effectiveness in those expected to live >5-7 years after implantation. Biological age rather than chronological age per se should be the decisive factor in making a decision on ICD selection for survival benefit.RIHUCBarra, SérgioProvidência, RuiPaiva, LuísHeck, PatrickAgarwal, Sharad2016-05-11T16:49:33Z2015-022015-02-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/1907engEuropace. 2015 Feb;17(2):174-86.10.1093/europace/euu296info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-11T14:23:11Zoai:rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt:10400.4/1907Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:04:21.393918Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the elderly: rationale and specific age-related considerations
title Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the elderly: rationale and specific age-related considerations
spellingShingle Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the elderly: rationale and specific age-related considerations
Barra, Sérgio
Arritmias Cardíacas
Desfibrilhadores implantáveis
Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca
Selecção de Doentes
title_short Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the elderly: rationale and specific age-related considerations
title_full Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the elderly: rationale and specific age-related considerations
title_fullStr Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the elderly: rationale and specific age-related considerations
title_full_unstemmed Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the elderly: rationale and specific age-related considerations
title_sort Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the elderly: rationale and specific age-related considerations
author Barra, Sérgio
author_facet Barra, Sérgio
Providência, Rui
Paiva, Luís
Heck, Patrick
Agarwal, Sharad
author_role author
author2 Providência, Rui
Paiva, Luís
Heck, Patrick
Agarwal, Sharad
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv RIHUC
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barra, Sérgio
Providência, Rui
Paiva, Luís
Heck, Patrick
Agarwal, Sharad
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Arritmias Cardíacas
Desfibrilhadores implantáveis
Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca
Selecção de Doentes
topic Arritmias Cardíacas
Desfibrilhadores implantáveis
Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca
Selecção de Doentes
description Despite the increasingly high rate of implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in elderly patients, data supporting their clinical and cost-effectiveness in this age stratum are ambiguous and contradictory. We comprehensively reviewed the state-of-the-art data regarding the applicability, safety, clinical- and cost-effectiveness of the ICD in elderly patients, and analysed which patients in this age stratum are more likely to get a survival benefit from this therapy. Although peri-procedural risk may be slightly higher in the elderly, this procedure is still relatively safe in this age group. In terms of correcting potentially life-threatening arrhythmias, the effectiveness of ICD therapy is comparable in older and younger individuals. However, the assumption of persistent ICD benefit in the elderly population is questionable, as any advantage of the device on arrhythmic death may be largely attenuated by a higher total non-arrhythmic mortality. While septuagenarians and octogenarians have higher annual all-cause mortality rates, ICD therapy may remain effective in highly selected patients at high risk of arrhythmic death and with minimum comorbidities despite advanced age. ICD intervention among the elderly, as a group, may not be cost-effective, but the procedure may reach cost-effectiveness in those expected to live >5-7 years after implantation. Biological age rather than chronological age per se should be the decisive factor in making a decision on ICD selection for survival benefit.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-02
2015-02-01T00:00:00Z
2016-05-11T16:49:33Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/1907
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/1907
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Europace. 2015 Feb;17(2):174-86.
10.1093/europace/euu296
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131705977602048