Induced Labor– Is There an Increased Risk of Perinatal Infection?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Olival, V
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Correia, A, Mahomed, F, Mira, R, Virella, D
Tipo de documento: Artigo de conferência
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/1046
Resumo: Objectives: To assess induced labor-associated perinatal infection risk at Hospital D.Estefânia from January to June of 2010 at Hospital de D. Estefânia’s delivery rooms, reviewing the indications for inducing labor as well as the techniques used. Material and Methods: Performing an historical prospective study searching the clinical processes as well as the mother and newborn’s computer database from January to June of 2010. An exposed and an unexposed group were created; the first group comprises pregnant women and their newborns whose labor was induced. The unexposed group is constituted by newborns and pregnant women whose labor was spontaneous. Labor induction was performed using intra-vaginal prostaglandins in women who didn’t start it spontaneously; perinatal infection was defined either clinically or using blood tests. The gestational age was ≥ 37 weeks for both groups. 19 variables were studied for both groups. Results: A total of 190 mother-newborn pairs were included: 55 in the exposed group and 135 in the unexposed group. 3 cases of perinatal infection were reported, two in the exposed group and one in the unexposed group. Preliminary data resulted in a perinatal infection rate of 3.6% in the exposed group and 0.7% in the unexposed group; preliminary data suggest that the risk of perinatal infection may be increased in up to 5-fold when labor is inducted. Conclusions: A larger series of patients and a multivariable analysis using logistic regression are both necessary in order to perform a more thorough assessment of labor induction’s role in perinatal infection risk. One must also try to distinguish labor inducing- and clinical practicesrelated factors.
id RCAP_336bec67d23342e56a644de4f40464be
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/1046
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Induced Labor– Is There an Increased Risk of Perinatal Infection?Parto InduzidoInfecçãoRecém-NascidoHDE OBSHDE PEDObjectives: To assess induced labor-associated perinatal infection risk at Hospital D.Estefânia from January to June of 2010 at Hospital de D. Estefânia’s delivery rooms, reviewing the indications for inducing labor as well as the techniques used. Material and Methods: Performing an historical prospective study searching the clinical processes as well as the mother and newborn’s computer database from January to June of 2010. An exposed and an unexposed group were created; the first group comprises pregnant women and their newborns whose labor was induced. The unexposed group is constituted by newborns and pregnant women whose labor was spontaneous. Labor induction was performed using intra-vaginal prostaglandins in women who didn’t start it spontaneously; perinatal infection was defined either clinically or using blood tests. The gestational age was ≥ 37 weeks for both groups. 19 variables were studied for both groups. Results: A total of 190 mother-newborn pairs were included: 55 in the exposed group and 135 in the unexposed group. 3 cases of perinatal infection were reported, two in the exposed group and one in the unexposed group. Preliminary data resulted in a perinatal infection rate of 3.6% in the exposed group and 0.7% in the unexposed group; preliminary data suggest that the risk of perinatal infection may be increased in up to 5-fold when labor is inducted. Conclusions: A larger series of patients and a multivariable analysis using logistic regression are both necessary in order to perform a more thorough assessment of labor induction’s role in perinatal infection risk. One must also try to distinguish labor inducing- and clinical practicesrelated factors.Serviço de Ginecologia-Obstetrícia e Serviço de Pediatria Médica, Hospital Dona Estefânia, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPERepositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPEOlival, VCorreia, AMahomed, FMira, RVirella, D2013-02-08T14:04:22Z20112011-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/1046engIN:Reunião Nacional, III Jornadas de Controlo de Infecção em Pediatria e II Jornadas de Controlo de Infecção de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia; 2011, 17 Novembro. Lisboa, Portugalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-10T09:29:07Zoai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/1046Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:18:38.862523Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Induced Labor– Is There an Increased Risk of Perinatal Infection?
title Induced Labor– Is There an Increased Risk of Perinatal Infection?
spellingShingle Induced Labor– Is There an Increased Risk of Perinatal Infection?
Olival, V
Parto Induzido
Infecção
Recém-Nascido
HDE OBS
HDE PED
title_short Induced Labor– Is There an Increased Risk of Perinatal Infection?
title_full Induced Labor– Is There an Increased Risk of Perinatal Infection?
title_fullStr Induced Labor– Is There an Increased Risk of Perinatal Infection?
title_full_unstemmed Induced Labor– Is There an Increased Risk of Perinatal Infection?
title_sort Induced Labor– Is There an Increased Risk of Perinatal Infection?
author Olival, V
author_facet Olival, V
Correia, A
Mahomed, F
Mira, R
Virella, D
author_role author
author2 Correia, A
Mahomed, F
Mira, R
Virella, D
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPE
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Olival, V
Correia, A
Mahomed, F
Mira, R
Virella, D
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Parto Induzido
Infecção
Recém-Nascido
HDE OBS
HDE PED
topic Parto Induzido
Infecção
Recém-Nascido
HDE OBS
HDE PED
description Objectives: To assess induced labor-associated perinatal infection risk at Hospital D.Estefânia from January to June of 2010 at Hospital de D. Estefânia’s delivery rooms, reviewing the indications for inducing labor as well as the techniques used. Material and Methods: Performing an historical prospective study searching the clinical processes as well as the mother and newborn’s computer database from January to June of 2010. An exposed and an unexposed group were created; the first group comprises pregnant women and their newborns whose labor was induced. The unexposed group is constituted by newborns and pregnant women whose labor was spontaneous. Labor induction was performed using intra-vaginal prostaglandins in women who didn’t start it spontaneously; perinatal infection was defined either clinically or using blood tests. The gestational age was ≥ 37 weeks for both groups. 19 variables were studied for both groups. Results: A total of 190 mother-newborn pairs were included: 55 in the exposed group and 135 in the unexposed group. 3 cases of perinatal infection were reported, two in the exposed group and one in the unexposed group. Preliminary data resulted in a perinatal infection rate of 3.6% in the exposed group and 0.7% in the unexposed group; preliminary data suggest that the risk of perinatal infection may be increased in up to 5-fold when labor is inducted. Conclusions: A larger series of patients and a multivariable analysis using logistic regression are both necessary in order to perform a more thorough assessment of labor induction’s role in perinatal infection risk. One must also try to distinguish labor inducing- and clinical practicesrelated factors.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011
2011-01-01T00:00:00Z
2013-02-08T14:04:22Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/1046
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/1046
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv IN:Reunião Nacional, III Jornadas de Controlo de Infecção em Pediatria e II Jornadas de Controlo de Infecção de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia; 2011, 17 Novembro. Lisboa, Portugal
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Serviço de Ginecologia-Obstetrícia e Serviço de Pediatria Médica, Hospital Dona Estefânia, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Serviço de Ginecologia-Obstetrícia e Serviço de Pediatria Médica, Hospital Dona Estefânia, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131283321782272