Riparian vegetation restoration: Does social perception reflect ecological value?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Arsénio, Pedro
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Rodríguez‐González, Patricia María, Bernez, Ivan, Dias, Filipe S., Bugalho, Miguel Nunes, Dufour, Simon
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/21989
Resumo: Special Issue Paper
id RCAP_343f937fec1d331b79a818637bf66903
oai_identifier_str oai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/21989
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Riparian vegetation restoration: Does social perception reflect ecological value?aesthetical perceptionfunctional diversityheadwater streamspassive ecological restorationriparian forestriver restorationsemantic differential approachstakeholder engagementSpecial Issue PaperSocial‐ecological contexts are key to the success of ecological restoration projects. The ecological quality of restoration efforts, however, may not be fully evident to stakeholders, particularly if the desired aesthetic experience is not delivered. Aesthetically pleasing landscapes are more highly appreciated and tend to be better protected than less appealing landscapes, regardless of their ecological value. Positive public perception of restoration actions may therefore facilitate stakeholder involvement and catalyse recognition of ecological improvement. Here we aim to contrast aesthetical perception and ecological condition in headwater river reaches restored through passive ecological restoration in study areas in Portugal (Alentejo) and France (Normandy). We recorded structural and functional indicators of riparian vegetation to monitor the ecological condition of study sites along a passive restoration trajectory. Aesthetical perception indicators were assessed through stakeholder inquiries developed under a semantic differential approach. We analysed perception responses to changes in the riparian ecosystems resulting from passive ecological restoration across different geographical contexts and social groups. The analysed social groups comprised stakeholders (environmental managers and landowners) and university students (landscape architecture and geography students). Results indicate that (a) visual preferences often do not reflect changes in ecological condition, (b) perception of the restoration process is strongly context dependent, and (c) experience and cultural background affect perception of ecological condition across the different social groups analysed. Clear identification of relevant stakeholder groups (those interested in or directly affected by restoration), effective communication, and stakeholder engagement are therefore essential for assuring the success of river restoration projectsJohn WileyRepositório da Universidade de LisboaArsénio, PedroRodríguez‐González, Patricia MaríaBernez, IvanDias, Filipe S.Bugalho, Miguel NunesDufour, Simon2021-09-24T11:36:10Z20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/21989engRiver Res Applic. 2019;1–1410.1002/rra.3514info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-06T14:51:32Zoai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/21989Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:06:30.568018Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Riparian vegetation restoration: Does social perception reflect ecological value?
title Riparian vegetation restoration: Does social perception reflect ecological value?
spellingShingle Riparian vegetation restoration: Does social perception reflect ecological value?
Arsénio, Pedro
aesthetical perception
functional diversity
headwater streams
passive ecological restoration
riparian forest
river restoration
semantic differential approach
stakeholder engagement
title_short Riparian vegetation restoration: Does social perception reflect ecological value?
title_full Riparian vegetation restoration: Does social perception reflect ecological value?
title_fullStr Riparian vegetation restoration: Does social perception reflect ecological value?
title_full_unstemmed Riparian vegetation restoration: Does social perception reflect ecological value?
title_sort Riparian vegetation restoration: Does social perception reflect ecological value?
author Arsénio, Pedro
author_facet Arsénio, Pedro
Rodríguez‐González, Patricia María
Bernez, Ivan
Dias, Filipe S.
Bugalho, Miguel Nunes
Dufour, Simon
author_role author
author2 Rodríguez‐González, Patricia María
Bernez, Ivan
Dias, Filipe S.
Bugalho, Miguel Nunes
Dufour, Simon
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Arsénio, Pedro
Rodríguez‐González, Patricia María
Bernez, Ivan
Dias, Filipe S.
Bugalho, Miguel Nunes
Dufour, Simon
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv aesthetical perception
functional diversity
headwater streams
passive ecological restoration
riparian forest
river restoration
semantic differential approach
stakeholder engagement
topic aesthetical perception
functional diversity
headwater streams
passive ecological restoration
riparian forest
river restoration
semantic differential approach
stakeholder engagement
description Special Issue Paper
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
2021-09-24T11:36:10Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/21989
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/21989
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv River Res Applic. 2019;1–14
10.1002/rra.3514
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv John Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv John Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1817550137512165376

Registros relacionados