E-commerce adoption by European firms: a cross-country multilevel analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/16372 |
Resumo: | E-commerce has been recognized as a new form of commerce and a fresh way to identify, target, and retain customers. However, firms are often uncertain about investing in the online channel as there is no guarantee this will result in consumers engaging in online transactions. The studies on e-commerce adoption usually distinguish the following three dimensions: environmental, technological, and organizational (Rodríguez-Ardura & Meseguer-Artola, 2010; Zhu, Kraemer, & Xu, 2003). There are few purely virtual firms, and the traditional channel and multichannels continue to be the predominant types of retail channels used by firms (Zhu, Kraemer, & Xu, 2006; Li, Troutt, Brandyberry, & Wang, 2011). This is due to the many obstacles faced by firms adopting e-commerce; more specifically, they must overcome important technical, cognitive, socio-political, economic, legal, managerial, financial, and cultural challenges (Zhu, Kraemer, & Xu, 2003; Molla & Licker, 2005; Kshetri, 2007). Given the heterogeneity of contexts, the factors constraining the adoption of ecommerce are not the same across firms and countries (digital divide). In light of this, our focus will be on firms that have not yet taken the decision to adopt e-commerce due to a set of restraints, and on analyzing the differences within- and between-countries. The research question to be answered is: What are the inhibitors of e-commerce adoption in each EU country? An analysis is made of the overall attitudes towards e-commerce adoption in European firms, linking specific deterrents of e-commerce adoption (e.g., higher delivery costs or the nature of business) and the following retailer characteristics: size, type of product, retail channels, and respondent’s position in the firm and engagement in distance selling. To explore the overall attitude towards e-commerce adoption, we propose a conceptual model that combines a two-level structure: the individual level, which models the attitudes towards barriers that prevent adoption of the online channel within each country; and the country level that highlights the similarities (and differences) between EU countries. The statistical model combines factorial and regression components. This model was estimated by the maximum likelihood method using the MPlus 6.12. CFI is 0.989, TLI is 0.984, and RMSEA is 0.034; therefore, model fit is excellent (Hu & Bentler, 1999). Results show that aspects such as firm size and the job position of respondents do not influence the attitudes toward e-commerce adoption. Three covariates point to theiv aversion to e-commerce: telesales/call center retailing, direct retail channels, and selling non-food products. |
id |
RCAP_348ff828f9e54631836f43edc03d1fb4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/16372 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
E-commerce adoption by European firms: a cross-country multilevel analysisE-commerce adoptionEuropean firmsConfirmatory factor analysisMultilevel analysisCountry level analysisComércio eletrónicoEmpresaVenda a retalhoAnálise de mercadoUnião EuropeiaE-commerce has been recognized as a new form of commerce and a fresh way to identify, target, and retain customers. However, firms are often uncertain about investing in the online channel as there is no guarantee this will result in consumers engaging in online transactions. The studies on e-commerce adoption usually distinguish the following three dimensions: environmental, technological, and organizational (Rodríguez-Ardura & Meseguer-Artola, 2010; Zhu, Kraemer, & Xu, 2003). There are few purely virtual firms, and the traditional channel and multichannels continue to be the predominant types of retail channels used by firms (Zhu, Kraemer, & Xu, 2006; Li, Troutt, Brandyberry, & Wang, 2011). This is due to the many obstacles faced by firms adopting e-commerce; more specifically, they must overcome important technical, cognitive, socio-political, economic, legal, managerial, financial, and cultural challenges (Zhu, Kraemer, & Xu, 2003; Molla & Licker, 2005; Kshetri, 2007). Given the heterogeneity of contexts, the factors constraining the adoption of ecommerce are not the same across firms and countries (digital divide). In light of this, our focus will be on firms that have not yet taken the decision to adopt e-commerce due to a set of restraints, and on analyzing the differences within- and between-countries. The research question to be answered is: What are the inhibitors of e-commerce adoption in each EU country? An analysis is made of the overall attitudes towards e-commerce adoption in European firms, linking specific deterrents of e-commerce adoption (e.g., higher delivery costs or the nature of business) and the following retailer characteristics: size, type of product, retail channels, and respondent’s position in the firm and engagement in distance selling. To explore the overall attitude towards e-commerce adoption, we propose a conceptual model that combines a two-level structure: the individual level, which models the attitudes towards barriers that prevent adoption of the online channel within each country; and the country level that highlights the similarities (and differences) between EU countries. The statistical model combines factorial and regression components. This model was estimated by the maximum likelihood method using the MPlus 6.12. CFI is 0.989, TLI is 0.984, and RMSEA is 0.034; therefore, model fit is excellent (Hu & Bentler, 1999). Results show that aspects such as firm size and the job position of respondents do not influence the attitudes toward e-commerce adoption. Three covariates point to theiv aversion to e-commerce: telesales/call center retailing, direct retail channels, and selling non-food products.A adoção do comércio eletrónico tem vindo a ser reconhecida como uma nova forma de retalho, bem como uma forma inovadora de identificar, adquirir e reter clientes. As empresas têm tendência a enfrentar a incerteza no momento de decidir se irão ou não investir num canal na Internet, dado que são necessários recursos internos e a oferta de um serviço que faça os clientes quererem efetuar novas compras pela Internet. Os estudos nesta área focam-se principalmente em três dimensões: organizacional, tecnológica e contextual (Rodríguez-Ardura & Meseguer-Artola, 2010; Zhu, Kraemer, & Xu, 2003). São poucas as firmas que usam apenas canais virtuais para vender produtos/serviços/informações, sendo o retalho tradicional e o multicanal os canais mais utilizados pelos retalhistas (Zhu, Kraemer, & Xu, 2006; Li, Troutt, Brandyberry, & Wang, 2011). Em consequência, a adoção de comércio eletrónico enfrenta vários obstáculos, nomeadamente técnicos, cognitivos, sociopolíticos, económicos, legais, financiais, culturais e organizacionais (Zhu, Kraemer, & Xu, 2003; Molla & Licker, 2005; Kshetri, 2007). Tendo em consideração a heterogeneidade contextual, torna-se evidente que os fatores que dificultam a adoção do comércio eletrónico não são os mesmos em diferentes empresas ou países, o que origina um fosso digital a nível global. Assim sendo, o nosso foco ao longo desta dissertação será em empresas que ainda não adotaram o comércio eletrónico, considerando os diferentes inibidores no momento da tomada de decisão pelos gestores, bem como as diferenças que existem em cada países e entre países da União Europeia. A questão principal a ser respondida será: Quais os fatores que inibem a adoção do comércio eletrónico em cada país europeu? Considerando esta questão basilar, irão ser analisadas as atitudes das empresas europeias perante a adoção de comércio eletrónico, cruzando impedimentos específicos à adoção de e-comércio (como por exemplo, os elevados custos associados à entrega ou a natureza do negócio) com características específicas dos retalhistas (covariáveis): dimensão da empresa, tipo de produto transacionado, os canais de venda, a posição dos entrevistados na empresa, bem como se estão já ou não a exportar produtos ou serviços. Para explorar estas atitudes das empresas europeias perante a adoção de comércio eletrónico, foi proposto um modelo conceptual que combina uma estrutura em dois níveis: a nível individual, o modelo analisa as atitudes em cada país relacionada com as barreiras associadas à adoção do comércio eletrónico; e ao nível do país, onde são identificadas as diferenças e as semelhanças entre os paísesii europeus. O modelo estatístico combina uma componente fatorial e uma componente de regressão. Para além disso, foi estimado usando o método de máxima verosimilhança, recorrendo ao software MPlus 6.12. Como o CFI é 0,989, o TLI é 0,984 e o RMSEA é 0,034, podemos concluir que o ajuste do modelo é excelente (Hu & Bentler, 1999). Os resultados revelam que aspetos como a dimensão da empresa e a posição dos entrevistados não influenciam as atitudes em relação à adoção do comércio eletrónico. Contudo, são três as covariáveis identificadas como tendo aversão à adoção do ecomércio: as empresas que usam as televendas, as empresas que usam o call center como canal de vendas e os retalhistas que optam pelas vendas diretas (comércio tradicional), bem como as que vendem produtos não alimentares.2018-07-13T14:15:22Z2021-07-13T00:00:00Z2017-11-13T00:00:00Z2017-11-132017-09info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfapplication/octet-streamhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/16372TID:201761718engGabriel, Paula Cristina Laranjeirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:47:32Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/16372Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:23:03.899727Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
E-commerce adoption by European firms: a cross-country multilevel analysis |
title |
E-commerce adoption by European firms: a cross-country multilevel analysis |
spellingShingle |
E-commerce adoption by European firms: a cross-country multilevel analysis Gabriel, Paula Cristina Laranjeira E-commerce adoption European firms Confirmatory factor analysis Multilevel analysis Country level analysis Comércio eletrónico Empresa Venda a retalho Análise de mercado União Europeia |
title_short |
E-commerce adoption by European firms: a cross-country multilevel analysis |
title_full |
E-commerce adoption by European firms: a cross-country multilevel analysis |
title_fullStr |
E-commerce adoption by European firms: a cross-country multilevel analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
E-commerce adoption by European firms: a cross-country multilevel analysis |
title_sort |
E-commerce adoption by European firms: a cross-country multilevel analysis |
author |
Gabriel, Paula Cristina Laranjeira |
author_facet |
Gabriel, Paula Cristina Laranjeira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gabriel, Paula Cristina Laranjeira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
E-commerce adoption European firms Confirmatory factor analysis Multilevel analysis Country level analysis Comércio eletrónico Empresa Venda a retalho Análise de mercado União Europeia |
topic |
E-commerce adoption European firms Confirmatory factor analysis Multilevel analysis Country level analysis Comércio eletrónico Empresa Venda a retalho Análise de mercado União Europeia |
description |
E-commerce has been recognized as a new form of commerce and a fresh way to identify, target, and retain customers. However, firms are often uncertain about investing in the online channel as there is no guarantee this will result in consumers engaging in online transactions. The studies on e-commerce adoption usually distinguish the following three dimensions: environmental, technological, and organizational (Rodríguez-Ardura & Meseguer-Artola, 2010; Zhu, Kraemer, & Xu, 2003). There are few purely virtual firms, and the traditional channel and multichannels continue to be the predominant types of retail channels used by firms (Zhu, Kraemer, & Xu, 2006; Li, Troutt, Brandyberry, & Wang, 2011). This is due to the many obstacles faced by firms adopting e-commerce; more specifically, they must overcome important technical, cognitive, socio-political, economic, legal, managerial, financial, and cultural challenges (Zhu, Kraemer, & Xu, 2003; Molla & Licker, 2005; Kshetri, 2007). Given the heterogeneity of contexts, the factors constraining the adoption of ecommerce are not the same across firms and countries (digital divide). In light of this, our focus will be on firms that have not yet taken the decision to adopt e-commerce due to a set of restraints, and on analyzing the differences within- and between-countries. The research question to be answered is: What are the inhibitors of e-commerce adoption in each EU country? An analysis is made of the overall attitudes towards e-commerce adoption in European firms, linking specific deterrents of e-commerce adoption (e.g., higher delivery costs or the nature of business) and the following retailer characteristics: size, type of product, retail channels, and respondent’s position in the firm and engagement in distance selling. To explore the overall attitude towards e-commerce adoption, we propose a conceptual model that combines a two-level structure: the individual level, which models the attitudes towards barriers that prevent adoption of the online channel within each country; and the country level that highlights the similarities (and differences) between EU countries. The statistical model combines factorial and regression components. This model was estimated by the maximum likelihood method using the MPlus 6.12. CFI is 0.989, TLI is 0.984, and RMSEA is 0.034; therefore, model fit is excellent (Hu & Bentler, 1999). Results show that aspects such as firm size and the job position of respondents do not influence the attitudes toward e-commerce adoption. Three covariates point to theiv aversion to e-commerce: telesales/call center retailing, direct retail channels, and selling non-food products. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-11-13T00:00:00Z 2017-11-13 2017-09 2018-07-13T14:15:22Z 2021-07-13T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/16372 TID:201761718 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/16372 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:201761718 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/octet-stream |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134791972421632 |