Prospective study of duodenal ulcer. Analysis of prognostic factors.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Guerreiro, S
Data de Publicação: 1991
Outros Autores: Neves, B, Va, S, Pires, M, Gouveia, A, Quina, M
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3356
Resumo: We conducted a prospective clinical trial of 154 patients with duodenal ulcer disease, which was divided in two different steps: healing phase and post-healing phase. In the first phase, the patients were randomly assigned to treatment with H2 blockers (Ranitidine 300 mg or Famotidine 40 mg), in a single bedtime dose. Endoscopy was performed after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and the healing rate was 70% and 90%. There were no significant differences between the two drugs. After 12 weeks of treatment there were sixteen patients with non-healed duodenal ulcer, considered as refractory duodenal ulcer disease, in which we started therapy with a double dose of H2 receptor antagonists or sucralfate (4 gr/day). Endoscopic follow-up after 12 weeks of this regimen revealed ulcer healing in about half of them; the cummulative healing rate in 6 months was 96.4%. Persistent lesions after 6 months of follow-up were found in 5 patients. Omeprazole 40 mg, single dose, was given and all of them were healed during the first 4 weeks of treatment. In the second phase, 137 patients healed during the first 3 months of treatment, were followed for 12 months and randomized in two groups: 61, with maintenance therapy--ranitidine 150 mg or famotidine 20 mg; 76, without treatment. In the patients without maintenance therapy, the recurrence rate was significantly higher (p less than 0.55), than in the group with maintenance therapy. In this group several parameters were evaluated--clinical, biochemical and psychosocial--to try to identify some prognostic markers of healing, relapse.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
id RCAP_34a8f8088089e6ee8f96fb94cbc0735b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/3356
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Prospective study of duodenal ulcer. Analysis of prognostic factors.Estudo prospectivo da evolução da doença ulcerosa duodenal. Análise de factores de prognóstico.We conducted a prospective clinical trial of 154 patients with duodenal ulcer disease, which was divided in two different steps: healing phase and post-healing phase. In the first phase, the patients were randomly assigned to treatment with H2 blockers (Ranitidine 300 mg or Famotidine 40 mg), in a single bedtime dose. Endoscopy was performed after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and the healing rate was 70% and 90%. There were no significant differences between the two drugs. After 12 weeks of treatment there were sixteen patients with non-healed duodenal ulcer, considered as refractory duodenal ulcer disease, in which we started therapy with a double dose of H2 receptor antagonists or sucralfate (4 gr/day). Endoscopic follow-up after 12 weeks of this regimen revealed ulcer healing in about half of them; the cummulative healing rate in 6 months was 96.4%. Persistent lesions after 6 months of follow-up were found in 5 patients. Omeprazole 40 mg, single dose, was given and all of them were healed during the first 4 weeks of treatment. In the second phase, 137 patients healed during the first 3 months of treatment, were followed for 12 months and randomized in two groups: 61, with maintenance therapy--ranitidine 150 mg or famotidine 20 mg; 76, without treatment. In the patients without maintenance therapy, the recurrence rate was significantly higher (p less than 0.55), than in the group with maintenance therapy. In this group several parameters were evaluated--clinical, biochemical and psychosocial--to try to identify some prognostic markers of healing, relapse.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)We conducted a prospective clinical trial of 154 patients with duodenal ulcer disease, which was divided in two different steps: healing phase and post-healing phase. In the first phase, the patients were randomly assigned to treatment with H2 blockers (Ranitidine 300 mg or Famotidine 40 mg), in a single bedtime dose. Endoscopy was performed after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and the healing rate was 70% and 90%. There were no significant differences between the two drugs. After 12 weeks of treatment there were sixteen patients with non-healed duodenal ulcer, considered as refractory duodenal ulcer disease, in which we started therapy with a double dose of H2 receptor antagonists or sucralfate (4 gr/day). Endoscopic follow-up after 12 weeks of this regimen revealed ulcer healing in about half of them; the cummulative healing rate in 6 months was 96.4%. Persistent lesions after 6 months of follow-up were found in 5 patients. Omeprazole 40 mg, single dose, was given and all of them were healed during the first 4 weeks of treatment. In the second phase, 137 patients healed during the first 3 months of treatment, were followed for 12 months and randomized in two groups: 61, with maintenance therapy--ranitidine 150 mg or famotidine 20 mg; 76, without treatment. In the patients without maintenance therapy, the recurrence rate was significantly higher (p less than 0.55), than in the group with maintenance therapy. In this group several parameters were evaluated--clinical, biochemical and psychosocial--to try to identify some prognostic markers of healing, relapse.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)Ordem dos Médicos1991-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3356oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/3356Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 4 No. 4 (1991): Julho-Agosto; 191-7Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 4 N.º 4 (1991): Julho-Agosto; 191-71646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3356https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3356/2682Guerreiro, SNeves, BVa, SPires, MGouveia, AQuina, Minfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T11:02:07Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/3356Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:18:19.642784Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prospective study of duodenal ulcer. Analysis of prognostic factors.
Estudo prospectivo da evolução da doença ulcerosa duodenal. Análise de factores de prognóstico.
title Prospective study of duodenal ulcer. Analysis of prognostic factors.
spellingShingle Prospective study of duodenal ulcer. Analysis of prognostic factors.
Guerreiro, S
title_short Prospective study of duodenal ulcer. Analysis of prognostic factors.
title_full Prospective study of duodenal ulcer. Analysis of prognostic factors.
title_fullStr Prospective study of duodenal ulcer. Analysis of prognostic factors.
title_full_unstemmed Prospective study of duodenal ulcer. Analysis of prognostic factors.
title_sort Prospective study of duodenal ulcer. Analysis of prognostic factors.
author Guerreiro, S
author_facet Guerreiro, S
Neves, B
Va, S
Pires, M
Gouveia, A
Quina, M
author_role author
author2 Neves, B
Va, S
Pires, M
Gouveia, A
Quina, M
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guerreiro, S
Neves, B
Va, S
Pires, M
Gouveia, A
Quina, M
description We conducted a prospective clinical trial of 154 patients with duodenal ulcer disease, which was divided in two different steps: healing phase and post-healing phase. In the first phase, the patients were randomly assigned to treatment with H2 blockers (Ranitidine 300 mg or Famotidine 40 mg), in a single bedtime dose. Endoscopy was performed after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and the healing rate was 70% and 90%. There were no significant differences between the two drugs. After 12 weeks of treatment there were sixteen patients with non-healed duodenal ulcer, considered as refractory duodenal ulcer disease, in which we started therapy with a double dose of H2 receptor antagonists or sucralfate (4 gr/day). Endoscopic follow-up after 12 weeks of this regimen revealed ulcer healing in about half of them; the cummulative healing rate in 6 months was 96.4%. Persistent lesions after 6 months of follow-up were found in 5 patients. Omeprazole 40 mg, single dose, was given and all of them were healed during the first 4 weeks of treatment. In the second phase, 137 patients healed during the first 3 months of treatment, were followed for 12 months and randomized in two groups: 61, with maintenance therapy--ranitidine 150 mg or famotidine 20 mg; 76, without treatment. In the patients without maintenance therapy, the recurrence rate was significantly higher (p less than 0.55), than in the group with maintenance therapy. In this group several parameters were evaluated--clinical, biochemical and psychosocial--to try to identify some prognostic markers of healing, relapse.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
publishDate 1991
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1991-08-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3356
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/3356
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3356
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/3356
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3356
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3356/2682
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 4 No. 4 (1991): Julho-Agosto; 191-7
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 4 N.º 4 (1991): Julho-Agosto; 191-7
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130635552423936