Prospective study of duodenal ulcer. Analysis of prognostic factors.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1991 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3356 |
Resumo: | We conducted a prospective clinical trial of 154 patients with duodenal ulcer disease, which was divided in two different steps: healing phase and post-healing phase. In the first phase, the patients were randomly assigned to treatment with H2 blockers (Ranitidine 300 mg or Famotidine 40 mg), in a single bedtime dose. Endoscopy was performed after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and the healing rate was 70% and 90%. There were no significant differences between the two drugs. After 12 weeks of treatment there were sixteen patients with non-healed duodenal ulcer, considered as refractory duodenal ulcer disease, in which we started therapy with a double dose of H2 receptor antagonists or sucralfate (4 gr/day). Endoscopic follow-up after 12 weeks of this regimen revealed ulcer healing in about half of them; the cummulative healing rate in 6 months was 96.4%. Persistent lesions after 6 months of follow-up were found in 5 patients. Omeprazole 40 mg, single dose, was given and all of them were healed during the first 4 weeks of treatment. In the second phase, 137 patients healed during the first 3 months of treatment, were followed for 12 months and randomized in two groups: 61, with maintenance therapy--ranitidine 150 mg or famotidine 20 mg; 76, without treatment. In the patients without maintenance therapy, the recurrence rate was significantly higher (p less than 0.55), than in the group with maintenance therapy. In this group several parameters were evaluated--clinical, biochemical and psychosocial--to try to identify some prognostic markers of healing, relapse.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) |
id |
RCAP_34a8f8088089e6ee8f96fb94cbc0735b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/3356 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Prospective study of duodenal ulcer. Analysis of prognostic factors.Estudo prospectivo da evolução da doença ulcerosa duodenal. Análise de factores de prognóstico.We conducted a prospective clinical trial of 154 patients with duodenal ulcer disease, which was divided in two different steps: healing phase and post-healing phase. In the first phase, the patients were randomly assigned to treatment with H2 blockers (Ranitidine 300 mg or Famotidine 40 mg), in a single bedtime dose. Endoscopy was performed after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and the healing rate was 70% and 90%. There were no significant differences between the two drugs. After 12 weeks of treatment there were sixteen patients with non-healed duodenal ulcer, considered as refractory duodenal ulcer disease, in which we started therapy with a double dose of H2 receptor antagonists or sucralfate (4 gr/day). Endoscopic follow-up after 12 weeks of this regimen revealed ulcer healing in about half of them; the cummulative healing rate in 6 months was 96.4%. Persistent lesions after 6 months of follow-up were found in 5 patients. Omeprazole 40 mg, single dose, was given and all of them were healed during the first 4 weeks of treatment. In the second phase, 137 patients healed during the first 3 months of treatment, were followed for 12 months and randomized in two groups: 61, with maintenance therapy--ranitidine 150 mg or famotidine 20 mg; 76, without treatment. In the patients without maintenance therapy, the recurrence rate was significantly higher (p less than 0.55), than in the group with maintenance therapy. In this group several parameters were evaluated--clinical, biochemical and psychosocial--to try to identify some prognostic markers of healing, relapse.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)We conducted a prospective clinical trial of 154 patients with duodenal ulcer disease, which was divided in two different steps: healing phase and post-healing phase. In the first phase, the patients were randomly assigned to treatment with H2 blockers (Ranitidine 300 mg or Famotidine 40 mg), in a single bedtime dose. Endoscopy was performed after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and the healing rate was 70% and 90%. There were no significant differences between the two drugs. After 12 weeks of treatment there were sixteen patients with non-healed duodenal ulcer, considered as refractory duodenal ulcer disease, in which we started therapy with a double dose of H2 receptor antagonists or sucralfate (4 gr/day). Endoscopic follow-up after 12 weeks of this regimen revealed ulcer healing in about half of them; the cummulative healing rate in 6 months was 96.4%. Persistent lesions after 6 months of follow-up were found in 5 patients. Omeprazole 40 mg, single dose, was given and all of them were healed during the first 4 weeks of treatment. In the second phase, 137 patients healed during the first 3 months of treatment, were followed for 12 months and randomized in two groups: 61, with maintenance therapy--ranitidine 150 mg or famotidine 20 mg; 76, without treatment. In the patients without maintenance therapy, the recurrence rate was significantly higher (p less than 0.55), than in the group with maintenance therapy. In this group several parameters were evaluated--clinical, biochemical and psychosocial--to try to identify some prognostic markers of healing, relapse.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)Ordem dos Médicos1991-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3356oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/3356Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 4 No. 4 (1991): Julho-Agosto; 191-7Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 4 N.º 4 (1991): Julho-Agosto; 191-71646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3356https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3356/2682Guerreiro, SNeves, BVa, SPires, MGouveia, AQuina, Minfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T11:02:07Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/3356Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:18:19.642784Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Prospective study of duodenal ulcer. Analysis of prognostic factors. Estudo prospectivo da evolução da doença ulcerosa duodenal. Análise de factores de prognóstico. |
title |
Prospective study of duodenal ulcer. Analysis of prognostic factors. |
spellingShingle |
Prospective study of duodenal ulcer. Analysis of prognostic factors. Guerreiro, S |
title_short |
Prospective study of duodenal ulcer. Analysis of prognostic factors. |
title_full |
Prospective study of duodenal ulcer. Analysis of prognostic factors. |
title_fullStr |
Prospective study of duodenal ulcer. Analysis of prognostic factors. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prospective study of duodenal ulcer. Analysis of prognostic factors. |
title_sort |
Prospective study of duodenal ulcer. Analysis of prognostic factors. |
author |
Guerreiro, S |
author_facet |
Guerreiro, S Neves, B Va, S Pires, M Gouveia, A Quina, M |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Neves, B Va, S Pires, M Gouveia, A Quina, M |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guerreiro, S Neves, B Va, S Pires, M Gouveia, A Quina, M |
description |
We conducted a prospective clinical trial of 154 patients with duodenal ulcer disease, which was divided in two different steps: healing phase and post-healing phase. In the first phase, the patients were randomly assigned to treatment with H2 blockers (Ranitidine 300 mg or Famotidine 40 mg), in a single bedtime dose. Endoscopy was performed after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and the healing rate was 70% and 90%. There were no significant differences between the two drugs. After 12 weeks of treatment there were sixteen patients with non-healed duodenal ulcer, considered as refractory duodenal ulcer disease, in which we started therapy with a double dose of H2 receptor antagonists or sucralfate (4 gr/day). Endoscopic follow-up after 12 weeks of this regimen revealed ulcer healing in about half of them; the cummulative healing rate in 6 months was 96.4%. Persistent lesions after 6 months of follow-up were found in 5 patients. Omeprazole 40 mg, single dose, was given and all of them were healed during the first 4 weeks of treatment. In the second phase, 137 patients healed during the first 3 months of treatment, were followed for 12 months and randomized in two groups: 61, with maintenance therapy--ranitidine 150 mg or famotidine 20 mg; 76, without treatment. In the patients without maintenance therapy, the recurrence rate was significantly higher (p less than 0.55), than in the group with maintenance therapy. In this group several parameters were evaluated--clinical, biochemical and psychosocial--to try to identify some prognostic markers of healing, relapse.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) |
publishDate |
1991 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1991-08-30 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3356 oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/3356 |
url |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3356 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/3356 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3356 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3356/2682 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 4 No. 4 (1991): Julho-Agosto; 191-7 Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 4 N.º 4 (1991): Julho-Agosto; 191-7 1646-0758 0870-399X reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130635552423936 |