City, culture and urbanism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.rcaap.pt/cct/article/view/21976 |
Resumo: | This article examines the formulation, implementation, and reasons for suspending the Master Plan of the Historic Centre of Asuncion (PlanCHA), Paraguay. Instead of a traditional master plan, the winner proposal of the international competition organized by the country’s National Government in 2014 is a master process composed of dozens of top-down and bottom-up participatory actions, articulated by ten initial strategies. The research carried out on PlanCHA is part of investigations ongoing at Nomads.usp, the Center for Interactive Living Studies of the Institute of Architecture and Urbanism, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil, on participatory decision-making processes in the context of urban interventions in several cities around the world. As in the case of Asuncion, we prioritize urban intervention plans that, in addition to face-to-face actions, include digital participation platforms. The research on PlanCHA aimed to understand the issues involved in the implementation of an action plan that included and depended totally on the participation of public managers, politicians, non-governmental organizations, universities, real estate agents, and traders for its success, in a capital city whose population has virtually no experience of participation in public decision-making processes. Finally, the article lists some hypotheses for the Plan’s interruption, categorized for administrative, political, and socio-economic reasons. We interviewed the winning office team in Madrid and the partner team of Paraguayan architects who implemented the project locally. In Asuncion, we also met historians, members and former members of the National and Local governments, real estate agents, community representatives, cultural producers, residents, and academic researchers. We made several technical visits to the Asuncion Historic Centre and studied historical, urban, demographic, academic, and journalistic documents. |
id |
RCAP_35a770e41a69c94c00a267aa48ecea6e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/21976 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
City, culture and urbanismCidade, cultura e urbanismoArticleThis article examines the formulation, implementation, and reasons for suspending the Master Plan of the Historic Centre of Asuncion (PlanCHA), Paraguay. Instead of a traditional master plan, the winner proposal of the international competition organized by the country’s National Government in 2014 is a master process composed of dozens of top-down and bottom-up participatory actions, articulated by ten initial strategies. The research carried out on PlanCHA is part of investigations ongoing at Nomads.usp, the Center for Interactive Living Studies of the Institute of Architecture and Urbanism, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil, on participatory decision-making processes in the context of urban interventions in several cities around the world. As in the case of Asuncion, we prioritize urban intervention plans that, in addition to face-to-face actions, include digital participation platforms. The research on PlanCHA aimed to understand the issues involved in the implementation of an action plan that included and depended totally on the participation of public managers, politicians, non-governmental organizations, universities, real estate agents, and traders for its success, in a capital city whose population has virtually no experience of participation in public decision-making processes. Finally, the article lists some hypotheses for the Plan’s interruption, categorized for administrative, political, and socio-economic reasons. We interviewed the winning office team in Madrid and the partner team of Paraguayan architects who implemented the project locally. In Asuncion, we also met historians, members and former members of the National and Local governments, real estate agents, community representatives, cultural producers, residents, and academic researchers. We made several technical visits to the Asuncion Historic Centre and studied historical, urban, demographic, academic, and journalistic documents.Este artigo examina a formulação, implementação e motivos da suspensão do Plano Diretor do Centro Histórico de Assunção (PlanCHA), Paraguai. Em vez de um plano diretor tradicional, a proposta vencedora do concurso internacional organizado pelo Governo Nacional do país em 2014 foi um processo mestre composto por dezenas de ações participativas top-down e bottom-up, articuladas por dez estratégias iniciais. A pesquisa realizada no PlanCHA fez parte das investigações em curso no Nomads.usp, Centro de Estudos Vivos Interativos do Instituto de Arquitetura e Urbanismo da Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil, sobre processos de tomada de decisão participativa no contexto de intervenções urbanas em várias cidades ao redor do mundo. Como no caso de Assunção, priorizamos planos de intervenção urbana que, além das ações presenciais, incluem plataformas de participação digital. A pesquisa sobre o PlanCHA teve como objetivo compreender as questões envolvidas na implementação de um plano de ação que incluiu e dependeu totalmente da participação de gestores públicos, políticos, organizações não governamentais, universidades, corretores imobiliários e comerciantes para o seu sucesso, numa capital cuja população praticamente não tem experiência de em processos de tomada de decisão pública. Por fim, o artigo lista algumas hipóteses para a interrupção do Plano, categorizadas por razões administrativas, políticas e socioeconómicas. Entrevistámos a equipa vencedora em Madrid e a equipa parceira de arquitetos paraguaios que implementaram o projeto localmente. Em Assunção, também encontramos historiadores, membros e ex-membros do governo nacional e local, agentes imobiliários, representantes comunitários, produtores culturais, moradores e pesquisadores académicos. Fizemos várias visitas técnicas ao Centro Histórico de Assunção e estudámos documentos históricos, urbanos, demográficos, académicos e jornalísticos.DINÂMIA'CET-Iscte2021-06-23T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://revistas.rcaap.pt/cct/article/view/21976eng2182-3030Tramontano, Marceloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-23T16:03:06Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/21976Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:05:03.637769Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
City, culture and urbanism Cidade, cultura e urbanismo |
title |
City, culture and urbanism |
spellingShingle |
City, culture and urbanism Tramontano, Marcelo Article |
title_short |
City, culture and urbanism |
title_full |
City, culture and urbanism |
title_fullStr |
City, culture and urbanism |
title_full_unstemmed |
City, culture and urbanism |
title_sort |
City, culture and urbanism |
author |
Tramontano, Marcelo |
author_facet |
Tramontano, Marcelo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tramontano, Marcelo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Article |
topic |
Article |
description |
This article examines the formulation, implementation, and reasons for suspending the Master Plan of the Historic Centre of Asuncion (PlanCHA), Paraguay. Instead of a traditional master plan, the winner proposal of the international competition organized by the country’s National Government in 2014 is a master process composed of dozens of top-down and bottom-up participatory actions, articulated by ten initial strategies. The research carried out on PlanCHA is part of investigations ongoing at Nomads.usp, the Center for Interactive Living Studies of the Institute of Architecture and Urbanism, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil, on participatory decision-making processes in the context of urban interventions in several cities around the world. As in the case of Asuncion, we prioritize urban intervention plans that, in addition to face-to-face actions, include digital participation platforms. The research on PlanCHA aimed to understand the issues involved in the implementation of an action plan that included and depended totally on the participation of public managers, politicians, non-governmental organizations, universities, real estate agents, and traders for its success, in a capital city whose population has virtually no experience of participation in public decision-making processes. Finally, the article lists some hypotheses for the Plan’s interruption, categorized for administrative, political, and socio-economic reasons. We interviewed the winning office team in Madrid and the partner team of Paraguayan architects who implemented the project locally. In Asuncion, we also met historians, members and former members of the National and Local governments, real estate agents, community representatives, cultural producers, residents, and academic researchers. We made several technical visits to the Asuncion Historic Centre and studied historical, urban, demographic, academic, and journalistic documents. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-23T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.rcaap.pt/cct/article/view/21976 |
url |
https://revistas.rcaap.pt/cct/article/view/21976 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2182-3030 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
DINÂMIA'CET-Iscte |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
DINÂMIA'CET-Iscte |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130512536633344 |