Efficacy of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Treatment of Biliary Complications following Liver Transplant: 10 Years of a Single-Centre Experience

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alves,Ana Rita
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Gomes,Dário, Furtado,Emanuel, Tomé,Luís
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452018000100004
Resumo: Background and Aims: Biliary tract complications following liver transplant remain an important source of morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has become a common therapeutic option before other invasive procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate ERCP efficacy in managing this type of complications. Methods: Retrospective study of all patients who underwent therapeutic ERCP due to post-liver transplant biliary complications between September 2005 and September 2015, at a deceased donor liver transplantation centre. Results: Therapeutic ERCP was performed in 120 patients (64% men; mean age 46 ± 14 years). Biliary complications were anastomotic strictures (AS) in 70%, non-anastomotic strictures (NAS) in 14%, bile leaks (BL) in 5.8%, and bile duct stones (BDS) in 32%. The mean time between liver transplant and first ERCP was: 19 ± 30 months in AS, 17 ± 30 months in NAS, 61 ± 28 months in BDS, and 0.7 ± 0.6 months in BL (p < 0.001). The number of ERCP performed per patient was: 3.8 ± 2.4 in AS, 3.8 ± 2.1 in NAS, 1.9 ± 1 in BDS, and 1.9 ± 0.5 in BL (p = 0.003). The duration of the treatment was: 18 ± 19 months in AS, 21 ± 17 months in NAS, 10 ± 10 months in BDS, and 4 ± 3 months in BL (p = 0.064). Overall, biliary complications were successfully managed by ERCP in 46% of cases, either as an isolated procedure (43%) or rendez-vous ERCP (3%). Per complication, ERCP was effective in 39% of AS, in 12% of NAS, in 91% of BDS, and in 86% of BL. Globally, the mean follow-up of the successful cases was 43 ± 31 months. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and/or surgery were performed in 48% of patients in whom ERCP was unsuccessful. The odds ratio for effective endoscopic treatment was 0.2 for NAS (0.057-0.815), 12.4 for BDS (1.535-100.9), and 6.9 for BL (0.798-58.95). No statistical significance was found for AS (p = 0.247). Conclusions: ERCP allowed the treatment of biliary complication in about half of patients, avoiding a more invasive procedure. Endoscopic treatment was more effective for BDS and BL.
id RCAP_3647fc322b15dfc4600b9d98e7688a73
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2341-45452018000100004
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Efficacy of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Treatment of Biliary Complications following Liver Transplant: 10 Years of a Single-Centre ExperienceLiver transplantationBiliary complicationsEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyTreatment efficacyBackground and Aims: Biliary tract complications following liver transplant remain an important source of morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has become a common therapeutic option before other invasive procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate ERCP efficacy in managing this type of complications. Methods: Retrospective study of all patients who underwent therapeutic ERCP due to post-liver transplant biliary complications between September 2005 and September 2015, at a deceased donor liver transplantation centre. Results: Therapeutic ERCP was performed in 120 patients (64% men; mean age 46 ± 14 years). Biliary complications were anastomotic strictures (AS) in 70%, non-anastomotic strictures (NAS) in 14%, bile leaks (BL) in 5.8%, and bile duct stones (BDS) in 32%. The mean time between liver transplant and first ERCP was: 19 ± 30 months in AS, 17 ± 30 months in NAS, 61 ± 28 months in BDS, and 0.7 ± 0.6 months in BL (p < 0.001). The number of ERCP performed per patient was: 3.8 ± 2.4 in AS, 3.8 ± 2.1 in NAS, 1.9 ± 1 in BDS, and 1.9 ± 0.5 in BL (p = 0.003). The duration of the treatment was: 18 ± 19 months in AS, 21 ± 17 months in NAS, 10 ± 10 months in BDS, and 4 ± 3 months in BL (p = 0.064). Overall, biliary complications were successfully managed by ERCP in 46% of cases, either as an isolated procedure (43%) or rendez-vous ERCP (3%). Per complication, ERCP was effective in 39% of AS, in 12% of NAS, in 91% of BDS, and in 86% of BL. Globally, the mean follow-up of the successful cases was 43 ± 31 months. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and/or surgery were performed in 48% of patients in whom ERCP was unsuccessful. The odds ratio for effective endoscopic treatment was 0.2 for NAS (0.057-0.815), 12.4 for BDS (1.535-100.9), and 6.9 for BL (0.798-58.95). No statistical significance was found for AS (p = 0.247). Conclusions: ERCP allowed the treatment of biliary complication in about half of patients, avoiding a more invasive procedure. Endoscopic treatment was more effective for BDS and BL.Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia2018-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452018000100004GE-Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology v.25 n.1 2018reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452018000100004Alves,Ana RitaGomes,DárioFurtado,EmanuelTomé,Luísinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:33:49Zoai:scielo:S2341-45452018000100004Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:36:02.392880Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efficacy of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Treatment of Biliary Complications following Liver Transplant: 10 Years of a Single-Centre Experience
title Efficacy of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Treatment of Biliary Complications following Liver Transplant: 10 Years of a Single-Centre Experience
spellingShingle Efficacy of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Treatment of Biliary Complications following Liver Transplant: 10 Years of a Single-Centre Experience
Alves,Ana Rita
Liver transplantation
Biliary complications
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Treatment efficacy
title_short Efficacy of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Treatment of Biliary Complications following Liver Transplant: 10 Years of a Single-Centre Experience
title_full Efficacy of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Treatment of Biliary Complications following Liver Transplant: 10 Years of a Single-Centre Experience
title_fullStr Efficacy of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Treatment of Biliary Complications following Liver Transplant: 10 Years of a Single-Centre Experience
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Treatment of Biliary Complications following Liver Transplant: 10 Years of a Single-Centre Experience
title_sort Efficacy of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Treatment of Biliary Complications following Liver Transplant: 10 Years of a Single-Centre Experience
author Alves,Ana Rita
author_facet Alves,Ana Rita
Gomes,Dário
Furtado,Emanuel
Tomé,Luís
author_role author
author2 Gomes,Dário
Furtado,Emanuel
Tomé,Luís
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves,Ana Rita
Gomes,Dário
Furtado,Emanuel
Tomé,Luís
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Liver transplantation
Biliary complications
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Treatment efficacy
topic Liver transplantation
Biliary complications
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Treatment efficacy
description Background and Aims: Biliary tract complications following liver transplant remain an important source of morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has become a common therapeutic option before other invasive procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate ERCP efficacy in managing this type of complications. Methods: Retrospective study of all patients who underwent therapeutic ERCP due to post-liver transplant biliary complications between September 2005 and September 2015, at a deceased donor liver transplantation centre. Results: Therapeutic ERCP was performed in 120 patients (64% men; mean age 46 ± 14 years). Biliary complications were anastomotic strictures (AS) in 70%, non-anastomotic strictures (NAS) in 14%, bile leaks (BL) in 5.8%, and bile duct stones (BDS) in 32%. The mean time between liver transplant and first ERCP was: 19 ± 30 months in AS, 17 ± 30 months in NAS, 61 ± 28 months in BDS, and 0.7 ± 0.6 months in BL (p < 0.001). The number of ERCP performed per patient was: 3.8 ± 2.4 in AS, 3.8 ± 2.1 in NAS, 1.9 ± 1 in BDS, and 1.9 ± 0.5 in BL (p = 0.003). The duration of the treatment was: 18 ± 19 months in AS, 21 ± 17 months in NAS, 10 ± 10 months in BDS, and 4 ± 3 months in BL (p = 0.064). Overall, biliary complications were successfully managed by ERCP in 46% of cases, either as an isolated procedure (43%) or rendez-vous ERCP (3%). Per complication, ERCP was effective in 39% of AS, in 12% of NAS, in 91% of BDS, and in 86% of BL. Globally, the mean follow-up of the successful cases was 43 ± 31 months. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and/or surgery were performed in 48% of patients in whom ERCP was unsuccessful. The odds ratio for effective endoscopic treatment was 0.2 for NAS (0.057-0.815), 12.4 for BDS (1.535-100.9), and 6.9 for BL (0.798-58.95). No statistical significance was found for AS (p = 0.247). Conclusions: ERCP allowed the treatment of biliary complication in about half of patients, avoiding a more invasive procedure. Endoscopic treatment was more effective for BDS and BL.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-02-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452018000100004
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452018000100004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452018000100004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv GE-Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology v.25 n.1 2018
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137412965728257