The application of post tender negotiation procedure: a public sector procurement perspective in UK

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Manso, Peter Frimpong
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Nikas, Athanasios
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm040202
Resumo: Post Tender Negotiation (PTN) procedure is part of the tendering process in procurement of goods and services. The procedure could be triggered if the initial tendering activity does not result in the selection of a supplier. This could be due to a lack of clear Value for Money (VfM) bidder. The PTN procedure is sparingly applied in the UK public sector procurement and the reasons adduced for this are based on ethical considerations. The UK Office of Government Procurement (OGP), formerly known as the Office for Government Commerce (OGC) and the European Union (EU) are the chief proponents of restricting the use of PTN to exceptional cases. The premise of their argument is that the buyer could unethically tilt her/his actions in the process of applying the PTN procedure to favor certain suppliers. It is the argument of this paper that buyers from the public sector in UK are being deprived of the procedure’s benefit and therefore, the restrictions should be relaxed. Evidence from this study suggests that the procedure could offer the opportunity for further clarifications of supplier’s bid. The study also identifies that, for PTN to be successful, factors ensuring success in negotiations including cooperation should be present.
id RCAP_36ac9ecd1b6d38d1c9c6247b00efd838
oai_identifier_str oai:journals.uminho.pt:article/3878
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The application of post tender negotiation procedure: a public sector procurement perspective in UKvalue for moneycommunicationprocurementnegotiationstenderingPost Tender Negotiation (PTN) procedure is part of the tendering process in procurement of goods and services. The procedure could be triggered if the initial tendering activity does not result in the selection of a supplier. This could be due to a lack of clear Value for Money (VfM) bidder. The PTN procedure is sparingly applied in the UK public sector procurement and the reasons adduced for this are based on ethical considerations. The UK Office of Government Procurement (OGP), formerly known as the Office for Government Commerce (OGC) and the European Union (EU) are the chief proponents of restricting the use of PTN to exceptional cases. The premise of their argument is that the buyer could unethically tilt her/his actions in the process of applying the PTN procedure to favor certain suppliers. It is the argument of this paper that buyers from the public sector in UK are being deprived of the procedure’s benefit and therefore, the restrictions should be relaxed. Evidence from this study suggests that the procedure could offer the opportunity for further clarifications of supplier’s bid. The study also identifies that, for PTN to be successful, factors ensuring success in negotiations including cooperation should be present.UMinho Editora2022-02-07info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm040202https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm040202International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 4 N.º 2 (2016); 23-39International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 4 No. 2 (2016); 23-392182-7788reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3878https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3878/3936Manso, Peter FrimpongNikas, Athanasiosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-23T11:57:52Zoai:journals.uminho.pt:article/3878Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:45:19.058763Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The application of post tender negotiation procedure: a public sector procurement perspective in UK
title The application of post tender negotiation procedure: a public sector procurement perspective in UK
spellingShingle The application of post tender negotiation procedure: a public sector procurement perspective in UK
Manso, Peter Frimpong
value for money
communication
procurement
negotiations
tendering
title_short The application of post tender negotiation procedure: a public sector procurement perspective in UK
title_full The application of post tender negotiation procedure: a public sector procurement perspective in UK
title_fullStr The application of post tender negotiation procedure: a public sector procurement perspective in UK
title_full_unstemmed The application of post tender negotiation procedure: a public sector procurement perspective in UK
title_sort The application of post tender negotiation procedure: a public sector procurement perspective in UK
author Manso, Peter Frimpong
author_facet Manso, Peter Frimpong
Nikas, Athanasios
author_role author
author2 Nikas, Athanasios
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Manso, Peter Frimpong
Nikas, Athanasios
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv value for money
communication
procurement
negotiations
tendering
topic value for money
communication
procurement
negotiations
tendering
description Post Tender Negotiation (PTN) procedure is part of the tendering process in procurement of goods and services. The procedure could be triggered if the initial tendering activity does not result in the selection of a supplier. This could be due to a lack of clear Value for Money (VfM) bidder. The PTN procedure is sparingly applied in the UK public sector procurement and the reasons adduced for this are based on ethical considerations. The UK Office of Government Procurement (OGP), formerly known as the Office for Government Commerce (OGC) and the European Union (EU) are the chief proponents of restricting the use of PTN to exceptional cases. The premise of their argument is that the buyer could unethically tilt her/his actions in the process of applying the PTN procedure to favor certain suppliers. It is the argument of this paper that buyers from the public sector in UK are being deprived of the procedure’s benefit and therefore, the restrictions should be relaxed. Evidence from this study suggests that the procedure could offer the opportunity for further clarifications of supplier’s bid. The study also identifies that, for PTN to be successful, factors ensuring success in negotiations including cooperation should be present.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-07
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm040202
https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm040202
url https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm040202
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3878
https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3878/3936
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UMinho Editora
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UMinho Editora
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 4 N.º 2 (2016); 23-39
International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 4 No. 2 (2016); 23-39
2182-7788
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131537664376832