A indignidade sucessória no direito romano : reflexos no direito português = Unworthiness to succeed in roman law : its impact in portuguese law

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Justo, António dos Santos
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11067/4362
https://doi.org/10.34628/b7d8-zm94
Resumo: Lusíada. Direito. - ISSN 2182-4118. - S. 2, n. 15 (2016). - p. 7-79
id RCAP_373efb3c1ccb6f01d8a841af362133b2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ulusiada.pt:11067/4362
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling A indignidade sucessória no direito romano : reflexos no direito português = Unworthiness to succeed in roman law : its impact in portuguese lawHerança e sucessão (Direito romano)Direito das sucessões - PortugalLusíada. Direito. - ISSN 2182-4118. - S. 2, n. 15 (2016). - p. 7-79Equitable barriers to succession were not a unitary element in the law of Rome in antiquity. Unconscionable behaviour by the successor towards the deceased (or family members) were considered by the imperial laws (constitutiones) a factor in succession rights. There has been no shortage of attempts by Romanists to classify these factors into several categories. In this juridical regime, it should be noticed that such conduct does not entail disinheritance; It only precludes retaining inherited goods that passed to the state treasury (the aerarium and later, the fiscus) and, exceptionally, to the persons legally considered. Therefore, equitable barriers to succession were not absolute bars. The Roman state did not immediately acquire the goods, but had to bring an action to determine whether the facts attributed to the putative successor had been established and, if so, declare him barred. The defendant was permitted to defend himself, contesting the action and appealing against the adverse judgment. In Roman law, the list of acts that could result in preclusion were considered to be exhaustive, a this was also later the case in Portuguese law, a situation provoking the disagreement between those who who refuse their extension to similar behaviour, - admitting only analogia legis - and those who admit the analogia iuris, the only kind of analogy that contemporary, non-positivist methodology considers. Another situation that divides Portuguese doctrine has to do with the necessity or not of an action and what its nature is. Considering that the security of legal commerce and the defence of the dignity of the successor requires an action, it seems that this is a declaratory action of simple appreciation: the judge merely tries whether the defendant is the author of the behaviour of which he is accused and, if such is established, declares such conduct wrongful. Equitable has a general character and therefore applies to all kinds of succession, even legitimacy. In this case, as the person precluded from succession is associated with his wrongdoing for all legal purposes (article 2166, paragraph 2 of the Portuguese Civil Code), the latter may provide grounds for disinheritance which, in turn, may also be reflected in the remaining forms of succession. Finally, the possibility that the author of the succession may rehabilitate the person barred from inheritance is not excluded, regard being had to the aforesaid association of preclusion with the wrongdoing in question.2018-11-09T12:51:33Z2018-11-092016-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11067/4362http://hdl.handle.net/11067/4362https://doi.org/10.34628/b7d8-zm94porhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJusto, António dos Santosreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-04T01:44:38Zoai:repositorio.ulusiada.pt:11067/4362Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:25:21.737707Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A indignidade sucessória no direito romano : reflexos no direito português = Unworthiness to succeed in roman law : its impact in portuguese law
title A indignidade sucessória no direito romano : reflexos no direito português = Unworthiness to succeed in roman law : its impact in portuguese law
spellingShingle A indignidade sucessória no direito romano : reflexos no direito português = Unworthiness to succeed in roman law : its impact in portuguese law
Justo, António dos Santos
Herança e sucessão (Direito romano)
Direito das sucessões - Portugal
title_short A indignidade sucessória no direito romano : reflexos no direito português = Unworthiness to succeed in roman law : its impact in portuguese law
title_full A indignidade sucessória no direito romano : reflexos no direito português = Unworthiness to succeed in roman law : its impact in portuguese law
title_fullStr A indignidade sucessória no direito romano : reflexos no direito português = Unworthiness to succeed in roman law : its impact in portuguese law
title_full_unstemmed A indignidade sucessória no direito romano : reflexos no direito português = Unworthiness to succeed in roman law : its impact in portuguese law
title_sort A indignidade sucessória no direito romano : reflexos no direito português = Unworthiness to succeed in roman law : its impact in portuguese law
author Justo, António dos Santos
author_facet Justo, António dos Santos
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Justo, António dos Santos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Herança e sucessão (Direito romano)
Direito das sucessões - Portugal
topic Herança e sucessão (Direito romano)
Direito das sucessões - Portugal
description Lusíada. Direito. - ISSN 2182-4118. - S. 2, n. 15 (2016). - p. 7-79
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
2018-11-09T12:51:33Z
2018-11-09
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11067/4362
http://hdl.handle.net/11067/4362
https://doi.org/10.34628/b7d8-zm94
url http://hdl.handle.net/11067/4362
https://doi.org/10.34628/b7d8-zm94
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136735513280512

Registros relacionados