Endobronchial biopsy and cytology. Comparative study.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1995 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2730 |
Resumo: | A retrospective study was performed in order to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy for lung cancer in histological biopsy specimens and in cytological examination taken at fibre optic bronchoscopy. Of 530 patients suspected of having a malignant lesion, 150 had pathological confirmation (group A) and 380 did not (group B). In group A biopsy was diagnosed in 78.7% and cytology in 58% of the cases, of which brushing was positive in 94.1% and washing in only 38.6% of the cases. In group B brushing disclosed the condition of lung epithelium in 91.8% and washing in only 48% of the cases. It is concluded that brushing had a higher diagnostic accuracy than washing in both groups, although inferior to biopsy. |
id |
RCAP_37c6141c6338b291c9feeb504f95adab |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/2730 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Endobronchial biopsy and cytology. Comparative study.Biópsia e citologia endobrônquicas. Estudo comparativo.A retrospective study was performed in order to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy for lung cancer in histological biopsy specimens and in cytological examination taken at fibre optic bronchoscopy. Of 530 patients suspected of having a malignant lesion, 150 had pathological confirmation (group A) and 380 did not (group B). In group A biopsy was diagnosed in 78.7% and cytology in 58% of the cases, of which brushing was positive in 94.1% and washing in only 38.6% of the cases. In group B brushing disclosed the condition of lung epithelium in 91.8% and washing in only 48% of the cases. It is concluded that brushing had a higher diagnostic accuracy than washing in both groups, although inferior to biopsy.A retrospective study was performed in order to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy for lung cancer in histological biopsy specimens and in cytological examination taken at fibre optic bronchoscopy. Of 530 patients suspected of having a malignant lesion, 150 had pathological confirmation (group A) and 380 did not (group B). In group A biopsy was diagnosed in 78.7% and cytology in 58% of the cases, of which brushing was positive in 94.1% and washing in only 38.6% of the cases. In group B brushing disclosed the condition of lung epithelium in 91.8% and washing in only 48% of the cases. It is concluded that brushing had a higher diagnostic accuracy than washing in both groups, although inferior to biopsy.Ordem dos Médicos1995-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2730oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/2730Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 8 No. 7-8 (1995): Julho-Agosto; 405-8Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 8 N.º 7-8 (1995): Julho-Agosto; 405-81646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2730https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2730/2120Matos, RSilva, M RCarvalho, Linfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T11:01:04Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/2730Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:17:55.993818Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Endobronchial biopsy and cytology. Comparative study. Biópsia e citologia endobrônquicas. Estudo comparativo. |
title |
Endobronchial biopsy and cytology. Comparative study. |
spellingShingle |
Endobronchial biopsy and cytology. Comparative study. Matos, R |
title_short |
Endobronchial biopsy and cytology. Comparative study. |
title_full |
Endobronchial biopsy and cytology. Comparative study. |
title_fullStr |
Endobronchial biopsy and cytology. Comparative study. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Endobronchial biopsy and cytology. Comparative study. |
title_sort |
Endobronchial biopsy and cytology. Comparative study. |
author |
Matos, R |
author_facet |
Matos, R Silva, M R Carvalho, L |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, M R Carvalho, L |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Matos, R Silva, M R Carvalho, L |
description |
A retrospective study was performed in order to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy for lung cancer in histological biopsy specimens and in cytological examination taken at fibre optic bronchoscopy. Of 530 patients suspected of having a malignant lesion, 150 had pathological confirmation (group A) and 380 did not (group B). In group A biopsy was diagnosed in 78.7% and cytology in 58% of the cases, of which brushing was positive in 94.1% and washing in only 38.6% of the cases. In group B brushing disclosed the condition of lung epithelium in 91.8% and washing in only 48% of the cases. It is concluded that brushing had a higher diagnostic accuracy than washing in both groups, although inferior to biopsy. |
publishDate |
1995 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1995-08-30 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2730 oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/2730 |
url |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2730 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/2730 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2730 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2730/2120 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 8 No. 7-8 (1995): Julho-Agosto; 405-8 Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 8 N.º 7-8 (1995): Julho-Agosto; 405-8 1646-0758 0870-399X reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130632145600512 |