Specialist health care services use in a European cohort of infants born very preterm

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Seppänen, AV
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Bodeau-Livinec, F, Boyle, EM, Edstedt-Bonamy, AK, Cuttini, M, Toome, L, Maier, RF, Cloet, E, Koopman-Esseboom, C, Pedersen, P, Gadzinowski, J, Barros, H, Zeitlin, J, Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe (EPICE) research group
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/154212
Resumo: Aim Children born very preterm require additional specialist care because of the health and developmental risks associated with preterm birth, but information on their health service use is sparse. We sought to describe the use of specialist services by children born very preterm in Europe. Method We analysed data from the multi-regional, population-based Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe (EPICE) cohort of births before 32 weeks’ gestation in 11 European countries. Perinatal data were abstracted from medical records and parents completed a questionnaire at 2 years corrected age (4322 children; 2026 females, 2296 males; median gestational age 29wks, interquartile range [IQR] 27–31wks; median birthweight 1230g, IQR 970–1511g). We compared parent-reported use of specialist services by country, perinatal risk (based on gestational age, small for gestational age, and neonatal morbidities), maternal education, and birthplace. Results Seventy-six per cent of the children had consulted at least one specialist, ranging across countries from 53.7% to 100%. Ophthalmologists (53.4%) and physiotherapists (48.0%) were most frequently consulted, but individual specialists varied greatly by country. Perinatal risk was associated with specialist use, but the gradient differed across countries. Children with more educated mothers had higher proportions of specialist use in three countries. Interpretation Large variations in the use of specialist services across Europe were not explained by perinatal risk and raise questions about the strengths and limits of existing models of care.
id RCAP_37ee55ea968bf8ec71ee2ee10d19a707
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/154212
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Specialist health care services use in a European cohort of infants born very pretermAim Children born very preterm require additional specialist care because of the health and developmental risks associated with preterm birth, but information on their health service use is sparse. We sought to describe the use of specialist services by children born very preterm in Europe. Method We analysed data from the multi-regional, population-based Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe (EPICE) cohort of births before 32 weeks’ gestation in 11 European countries. Perinatal data were abstracted from medical records and parents completed a questionnaire at 2 years corrected age (4322 children; 2026 females, 2296 males; median gestational age 29wks, interquartile range [IQR] 27–31wks; median birthweight 1230g, IQR 970–1511g). We compared parent-reported use of specialist services by country, perinatal risk (based on gestational age, small for gestational age, and neonatal morbidities), maternal education, and birthplace. Results Seventy-six per cent of the children had consulted at least one specialist, ranging across countries from 53.7% to 100%. Ophthalmologists (53.4%) and physiotherapists (48.0%) were most frequently consulted, but individual specialists varied greatly by country. Perinatal risk was associated with specialist use, but the gradient differed across countries. Children with more educated mothers had higher proportions of specialist use in three countries. Interpretation Large variations in the use of specialist services across Europe were not explained by perinatal risk and raise questions about the strengths and limits of existing models of care.Wiley20192019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/154212eng0012-16221469-874910.1111/dmcn.14112Seppänen, AVBodeau-Livinec, FBoyle, EMEdstedt-Bonamy, AKCuttini, MToome, LMaier, RFCloet, EKoopman-Esseboom, CPedersen, PGadzinowski, JBarros, HZeitlin, JEffective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe (EPICE) research groupinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T12:26:58Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/154212Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:20:32.964007Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Specialist health care services use in a European cohort of infants born very preterm
title Specialist health care services use in a European cohort of infants born very preterm
spellingShingle Specialist health care services use in a European cohort of infants born very preterm
Seppänen, AV
title_short Specialist health care services use in a European cohort of infants born very preterm
title_full Specialist health care services use in a European cohort of infants born very preterm
title_fullStr Specialist health care services use in a European cohort of infants born very preterm
title_full_unstemmed Specialist health care services use in a European cohort of infants born very preterm
title_sort Specialist health care services use in a European cohort of infants born very preterm
author Seppänen, AV
author_facet Seppänen, AV
Bodeau-Livinec, F
Boyle, EM
Edstedt-Bonamy, AK
Cuttini, M
Toome, L
Maier, RF
Cloet, E
Koopman-Esseboom, C
Pedersen, P
Gadzinowski, J
Barros, H
Zeitlin, J
Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe (EPICE) research group
author_role author
author2 Bodeau-Livinec, F
Boyle, EM
Edstedt-Bonamy, AK
Cuttini, M
Toome, L
Maier, RF
Cloet, E
Koopman-Esseboom, C
Pedersen, P
Gadzinowski, J
Barros, H
Zeitlin, J
Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe (EPICE) research group
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Seppänen, AV
Bodeau-Livinec, F
Boyle, EM
Edstedt-Bonamy, AK
Cuttini, M
Toome, L
Maier, RF
Cloet, E
Koopman-Esseboom, C
Pedersen, P
Gadzinowski, J
Barros, H
Zeitlin, J
Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe (EPICE) research group
description Aim Children born very preterm require additional specialist care because of the health and developmental risks associated with preterm birth, but information on their health service use is sparse. We sought to describe the use of specialist services by children born very preterm in Europe. Method We analysed data from the multi-regional, population-based Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe (EPICE) cohort of births before 32 weeks’ gestation in 11 European countries. Perinatal data were abstracted from medical records and parents completed a questionnaire at 2 years corrected age (4322 children; 2026 females, 2296 males; median gestational age 29wks, interquartile range [IQR] 27–31wks; median birthweight 1230g, IQR 970–1511g). We compared parent-reported use of specialist services by country, perinatal risk (based on gestational age, small for gestational age, and neonatal morbidities), maternal education, and birthplace. Results Seventy-six per cent of the children had consulted at least one specialist, ranging across countries from 53.7% to 100%. Ophthalmologists (53.4%) and physiotherapists (48.0%) were most frequently consulted, but individual specialists varied greatly by country. Perinatal risk was associated with specialist use, but the gradient differed across countries. Children with more educated mothers had higher proportions of specialist use in three countries. Interpretation Large variations in the use of specialist services across Europe were not explained by perinatal risk and raise questions about the strengths and limits of existing models of care.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10216/154212
url https://hdl.handle.net/10216/154212
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0012-1622
1469-8749
10.1111/dmcn.14112
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135504820600832