News Media Monitoring Capabilities in 14 European Countries: Problems and Best Practices
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7199 |
Resumo: | Social acceleration has been a catalyst for rapid changes concerning the mediascapes of European societies. Democratic societies need deliberation, but what kinds of journalism and communication cultures are supported by different stakeholders and structural possibilities? The aim of this article is to conceptualise and analyse the risks and opportunities concerning the monitoring capabilities in key domains of the media field. This includes the performance and normative regulation of news media (journalism) as well as media usage patterns and competencies of different actors, all of which influence the quality of deliberative communication across cultures. The monitoring potential is related to various stakeholders who gather data and information on media and media usage, transform the information into knowledge, and use this knowledge to create evidence-based media policy. What interests and values are served by which stakeholders and how does this actual monitoring serve the media policy in different European countries? What is the role and resources of media researchers? These questions are answered with the help of an extensive literature review and a synoptic analysis of the monitoring capabilities of 14 European countries, based on original case studies. The article will, thus, broaden the conceptual understanding of risks and opportunities for deliberative communication in democratic societies—and at the same time offer an initial inventory of typical problems and best practices for monitoring deliberative communication across Europe. |
id |
RCAP_39cc1150e7b2ad08ac44c729a65234d3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7199 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
News Media Monitoring Capabilities in 14 European Countries: Problems and Best Practicesdeliberative communication; Europe; media monitoring; monitoring capabilities; risks and opportunities; structure and agencySocial acceleration has been a catalyst for rapid changes concerning the mediascapes of European societies. Democratic societies need deliberation, but what kinds of journalism and communication cultures are supported by different stakeholders and structural possibilities? The aim of this article is to conceptualise and analyse the risks and opportunities concerning the monitoring capabilities in key domains of the media field. This includes the performance and normative regulation of news media (journalism) as well as media usage patterns and competencies of different actors, all of which influence the quality of deliberative communication across cultures. The monitoring potential is related to various stakeholders who gather data and information on media and media usage, transform the information into knowledge, and use this knowledge to create evidence-based media policy. What interests and values are served by which stakeholders and how does this actual monitoring serve the media policy in different European countries? What is the role and resources of media researchers? These questions are answered with the help of an extensive literature review and a synoptic analysis of the monitoring capabilities of 14 European countries, based on original case studies. The article will, thus, broaden the conceptual understanding of risks and opportunities for deliberative communication in democratic societies—and at the same time offer an initial inventory of typical problems and best practices for monitoring deliberative communication across Europe.Cogitatio Press2024-01-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7199https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7199Media and Communication; Vol 12 (2024): Democracy and Media Transformations in the 21st Century: Analysing Knowledge and Expertise2183-243910.17645/mac.i389reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7199https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7199/3520Copyright (c) 2024 Halliki Harro-Loit, Tobias Eberweininfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHarro-Loit, HallikiEberwein, Tobias2024-01-18T17:51:41Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7199Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:52:03.282014Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
News Media Monitoring Capabilities in 14 European Countries: Problems and Best Practices |
title |
News Media Monitoring Capabilities in 14 European Countries: Problems and Best Practices |
spellingShingle |
News Media Monitoring Capabilities in 14 European Countries: Problems and Best Practices Harro-Loit, Halliki deliberative communication; Europe; media monitoring; monitoring capabilities; risks and opportunities; structure and agency |
title_short |
News Media Monitoring Capabilities in 14 European Countries: Problems and Best Practices |
title_full |
News Media Monitoring Capabilities in 14 European Countries: Problems and Best Practices |
title_fullStr |
News Media Monitoring Capabilities in 14 European Countries: Problems and Best Practices |
title_full_unstemmed |
News Media Monitoring Capabilities in 14 European Countries: Problems and Best Practices |
title_sort |
News Media Monitoring Capabilities in 14 European Countries: Problems and Best Practices |
author |
Harro-Loit, Halliki |
author_facet |
Harro-Loit, Halliki Eberwein, Tobias |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Eberwein, Tobias |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Harro-Loit, Halliki Eberwein, Tobias |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
deliberative communication; Europe; media monitoring; monitoring capabilities; risks and opportunities; structure and agency |
topic |
deliberative communication; Europe; media monitoring; monitoring capabilities; risks and opportunities; structure and agency |
description |
Social acceleration has been a catalyst for rapid changes concerning the mediascapes of European societies. Democratic societies need deliberation, but what kinds of journalism and communication cultures are supported by different stakeholders and structural possibilities? The aim of this article is to conceptualise and analyse the risks and opportunities concerning the monitoring capabilities in key domains of the media field. This includes the performance and normative regulation of news media (journalism) as well as media usage patterns and competencies of different actors, all of which influence the quality of deliberative communication across cultures. The monitoring potential is related to various stakeholders who gather data and information on media and media usage, transform the information into knowledge, and use this knowledge to create evidence-based media policy. What interests and values are served by which stakeholders and how does this actual monitoring serve the media policy in different European countries? What is the role and resources of media researchers? These questions are answered with the help of an extensive literature review and a synoptic analysis of the monitoring capabilities of 14 European countries, based on original case studies. The article will, thus, broaden the conceptual understanding of risks and opportunities for deliberative communication in democratic societies—and at the same time offer an initial inventory of typical problems and best practices for monitoring deliberative communication across Europe. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-15 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7199 https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7199 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7199 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7199 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7199/3520 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Halliki Harro-Loit, Tobias Eberwein info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Halliki Harro-Loit, Tobias Eberwein |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Media and Communication; Vol 12 (2024): Democracy and Media Transformations in the 21st Century: Analysing Knowledge and Expertise 2183-2439 10.17645/mac.i389 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137010848366592 |