Ureteric lesions detected in normally functioning kidney allografts: risk factors and clinical implications

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Figueiredo, AJ
Data de Publicação: 2005
Outros Autores: Cunha, MX, Mota, A, Furtado, AL
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/391
Resumo: INTRODUCTION: We characterized the alterations in ureteral biopsies from normally functioning kidney allografts to study risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 55 ureteral fragments from kidney grafts obtained during cystoscopy for routine double-J stent extraction. We evaluated the type and severity of the lesions, the risk factors for their occurrence, and their relation to the evolution of the transplant, including the occurrence of renal rejection episodes or ureteral complications. RESULTS: Borderline or rejection lesions were detected in 21 of the 55 fragments. Rejection lesions were more common among biopsies performed in the first 80 days (54.6%) than during the 120 days afterward (15.4%, P = .043). Similarly, urothelium reactivity was detected in 71.4% and 30.7% of the biopsies performed up to and after 4 months, respectively (P = .008). Urothelial atrophy was detected in 20% of the fragments, the age of the donors being higher in these cases (P = .026). There was a trend to the association of borderline or rejection lesions in the ureteral biopsies and a history of an acute renal rejection episode (P = .053). There were no detectable relations between those findings and the evolution of the transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-eight percent of the biopsed ureters showed rejection or borderline lesions, these lesions were more common among biopsies done in the first months after transplantation. These findings are similar to the ones found in routine renal biopsies. We did not find any significant relation between the nature of the lesions encountered on the ureteral biopsies and the evolution of the transplant.
id RCAP_39f282409aae3577de1dd04b9e3d9af9
oai_identifier_str oai:rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt:10400.4/391
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Ureteric lesions detected in normally functioning kidney allografts: risk factors and clinical implicationsTransplantação de RimRejeição do TransplanteUréterINTRODUCTION: We characterized the alterations in ureteral biopsies from normally functioning kidney allografts to study risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 55 ureteral fragments from kidney grafts obtained during cystoscopy for routine double-J stent extraction. We evaluated the type and severity of the lesions, the risk factors for their occurrence, and their relation to the evolution of the transplant, including the occurrence of renal rejection episodes or ureteral complications. RESULTS: Borderline or rejection lesions were detected in 21 of the 55 fragments. Rejection lesions were more common among biopsies performed in the first 80 days (54.6%) than during the 120 days afterward (15.4%, P = .043). Similarly, urothelium reactivity was detected in 71.4% and 30.7% of the biopsies performed up to and after 4 months, respectively (P = .008). Urothelial atrophy was detected in 20% of the fragments, the age of the donors being higher in these cases (P = .026). There was a trend to the association of borderline or rejection lesions in the ureteral biopsies and a history of an acute renal rejection episode (P = .053). There were no detectable relations between those findings and the evolution of the transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-eight percent of the biopsed ureters showed rejection or borderline lesions, these lesions were more common among biopsies done in the first months after transplantation. These findings are similar to the ones found in routine renal biopsies. We did not find any significant relation between the nature of the lesions encountered on the ureteral biopsies and the evolution of the transplant.ElsevierRIHUCFigueiredo, AJCunha, MXMota, AFurtado, AL2008-12-30T12:18:42Z20052005-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/391engTransplant Proc. 2005 Jul-Aug;37(6):2762-4info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-11T14:21:33Zoai:rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt:10400.4/391Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:03:11.685206Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ureteric lesions detected in normally functioning kidney allografts: risk factors and clinical implications
title Ureteric lesions detected in normally functioning kidney allografts: risk factors and clinical implications
spellingShingle Ureteric lesions detected in normally functioning kidney allografts: risk factors and clinical implications
Figueiredo, AJ
Transplantação de Rim
Rejeição do Transplante
Uréter
title_short Ureteric lesions detected in normally functioning kidney allografts: risk factors and clinical implications
title_full Ureteric lesions detected in normally functioning kidney allografts: risk factors and clinical implications
title_fullStr Ureteric lesions detected in normally functioning kidney allografts: risk factors and clinical implications
title_full_unstemmed Ureteric lesions detected in normally functioning kidney allografts: risk factors and clinical implications
title_sort Ureteric lesions detected in normally functioning kidney allografts: risk factors and clinical implications
author Figueiredo, AJ
author_facet Figueiredo, AJ
Cunha, MX
Mota, A
Furtado, AL
author_role author
author2 Cunha, MX
Mota, A
Furtado, AL
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv RIHUC
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Figueiredo, AJ
Cunha, MX
Mota, A
Furtado, AL
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Transplantação de Rim
Rejeição do Transplante
Uréter
topic Transplantação de Rim
Rejeição do Transplante
Uréter
description INTRODUCTION: We characterized the alterations in ureteral biopsies from normally functioning kidney allografts to study risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 55 ureteral fragments from kidney grafts obtained during cystoscopy for routine double-J stent extraction. We evaluated the type and severity of the lesions, the risk factors for their occurrence, and their relation to the evolution of the transplant, including the occurrence of renal rejection episodes or ureteral complications. RESULTS: Borderline or rejection lesions were detected in 21 of the 55 fragments. Rejection lesions were more common among biopsies performed in the first 80 days (54.6%) than during the 120 days afterward (15.4%, P = .043). Similarly, urothelium reactivity was detected in 71.4% and 30.7% of the biopsies performed up to and after 4 months, respectively (P = .008). Urothelial atrophy was detected in 20% of the fragments, the age of the donors being higher in these cases (P = .026). There was a trend to the association of borderline or rejection lesions in the ureteral biopsies and a history of an acute renal rejection episode (P = .053). There were no detectable relations between those findings and the evolution of the transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-eight percent of the biopsed ureters showed rejection or borderline lesions, these lesions were more common among biopsies done in the first months after transplantation. These findings are similar to the ones found in routine renal biopsies. We did not find any significant relation between the nature of the lesions encountered on the ureteral biopsies and the evolution of the transplant.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005
2005-01-01T00:00:00Z
2008-12-30T12:18:42Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/391
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/391
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Transplant Proc. 2005 Jul-Aug;37(6):2762-4
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131696280371200