Honey bee colony winter loss rates for 35 countries participating in the COLOSS survey for winter 2018–2019, and the effects of a new queen on the risk of colony winter loss

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gray, Alison
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Adjlane, Noureddine, Arab, Alireza, Ballis, Alexis, Brusbardis, Valters, Charrière, Jean-Daniel, Chlebo, Robert, Coffey, Mary F., Cornelissen, Bram, Costa, Cristina Amaro Da, Dahle, Bjørn, Danihlík, Jiří, Dražić, Marica Maja, Evans, Garth, Fedoriak, Mariia, Forsythe, Ivan, Gajda, Anna, de Graaf, Dirk C., Gregorc, Aleš, Ilieva, Iliyana, Johannesen, Jes, Kauko, Lassi, Kristiansen, Preben, Martikkala, Maritta, Martín-Hernández, Raquel, Medina-Flores, Carlos Aurelio, Mutinelli, Franco, Patalano, Solenn, Raudmets, Aivar, Martin, Gilles San, Soroker, Victoria, Stevanovic, Jevrosima, Uzunov, Aleksandar, Vejsnaes, Flemming, Williams, Anthony, Zammit-Mangion, Marion, Brodschneider, Robert
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.19/6356
Resumo: This article presents managed honey bee colony loss rates over winter 2018/19 resulting from using the standardised COLOSS questionnaire in 35 countries (31 in Europe). In total, 28,629 beekeepers supplying valid loss data wintered 738,233 colonies, and reported 29,912 (4.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0–4.1%) colonies with unsolvable queen problems, 79,146 (10.7%, 95% CI 10.5–10.9%) dead colonies after winter and 13,895 colonies (1.9%, 95% CI 1.8–2.0%) lost through natural disaster. This gave an overall colony winter loss rate of 16.7% (95% CI 16.4–16.9%), varying greatly between countries, from 5.8% to 32.0%. We modelled the risk of loss as a dead/empty colony or from unresolvable queen problems, and found that, overall, larger beekeeping operations with more than 150 colonies experienced significantly lower losses (p < 0.001), consistent with earlier studies. Additionally, beekeepers included in this survey who did not migrate their colonies at least once in 2018 had significantly lower losses than those migrating (p < 0.001). The percentage of new queens from 2018 in wintered colonies was also examined as a potential risk factor. The percentage of colonies going into winter with a new queen was estimated as 55.0% over all countries. Higher percentages of young queens corresponded to lower overall losses (excluding losses from natural disaster), but also lower losses from unresolvable queen problems, and lower losses from winter mortality (p < 0.001). Detailed results for each country and overall are given in a table, and a map shows relative risks of winter loss at regional level.
id RCAP_3a02ba86122064fff311f212201095ae
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ipv.pt:10400.19/6356
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Honey bee colony winter loss rates for 35 countries participating in the COLOSS survey for winter 2018–2019, and the effects of a new queen on the risk of colony winter lossBeekeepingMortalityColony winter lossesMonitoring surveysApis melliferaThis article presents managed honey bee colony loss rates over winter 2018/19 resulting from using the standardised COLOSS questionnaire in 35 countries (31 in Europe). In total, 28,629 beekeepers supplying valid loss data wintered 738,233 colonies, and reported 29,912 (4.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0–4.1%) colonies with unsolvable queen problems, 79,146 (10.7%, 95% CI 10.5–10.9%) dead colonies after winter and 13,895 colonies (1.9%, 95% CI 1.8–2.0%) lost through natural disaster. This gave an overall colony winter loss rate of 16.7% (95% CI 16.4–16.9%), varying greatly between countries, from 5.8% to 32.0%. We modelled the risk of loss as a dead/empty colony or from unresolvable queen problems, and found that, overall, larger beekeeping operations with more than 150 colonies experienced significantly lower losses (p < 0.001), consistent with earlier studies. Additionally, beekeepers included in this survey who did not migrate their colonies at least once in 2018 had significantly lower losses than those migrating (p < 0.001). The percentage of new queens from 2018 in wintered colonies was also examined as a potential risk factor. The percentage of colonies going into winter with a new queen was estimated as 55.0% over all countries. Higher percentages of young queens corresponded to lower overall losses (excluding losses from natural disaster), but also lower losses from unresolvable queen problems, and lower losses from winter mortality (p < 0.001). Detailed results for each country and overall are given in a table, and a map shows relative risks of winter loss at regional level.Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de ViseuGray, AlisonAdjlane, NoureddineArab, AlirezaBallis, AlexisBrusbardis, ValtersCharrière, Jean-DanielChlebo, RobertCoffey, Mary F.Cornelissen, BramCosta, Cristina Amaro DaDahle, BjørnDanihlík, JiříDražić, Marica MajaEvans, GarthFedoriak, MariiaForsythe, IvanGajda, Annade Graaf, Dirk C.Gregorc, AlešIlieva, IliyanaJohannesen, JesKauko, LassiKristiansen, PrebenMartikkala, MarittaMartín-Hernández, RaquelMedina-Flores, Carlos AurelioMutinelli, FrancoPatalano, SolennRaudmets, AivarMartin, Gilles SanSoroker, VictoriaStevanovic, JevrosimaUzunov, AleksandarVejsnaes, FlemmingWilliams, AnthonyZammit-Mangion, MarionBrodschneider, Robert2020-09-07T10:36:22Z20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.19/6356eng10.1080/00218839.2020.1797272info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-01-16T15:28:35Zoai:repositorio.ipv.pt:10400.19/6356Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:44:16.554767Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Honey bee colony winter loss rates for 35 countries participating in the COLOSS survey for winter 2018–2019, and the effects of a new queen on the risk of colony winter loss
title Honey bee colony winter loss rates for 35 countries participating in the COLOSS survey for winter 2018–2019, and the effects of a new queen on the risk of colony winter loss
spellingShingle Honey bee colony winter loss rates for 35 countries participating in the COLOSS survey for winter 2018–2019, and the effects of a new queen on the risk of colony winter loss
Gray, Alison
Beekeeping
Mortality
Colony winter losses
Monitoring surveys
Apis mellifera
title_short Honey bee colony winter loss rates for 35 countries participating in the COLOSS survey for winter 2018–2019, and the effects of a new queen on the risk of colony winter loss
title_full Honey bee colony winter loss rates for 35 countries participating in the COLOSS survey for winter 2018–2019, and the effects of a new queen on the risk of colony winter loss
title_fullStr Honey bee colony winter loss rates for 35 countries participating in the COLOSS survey for winter 2018–2019, and the effects of a new queen on the risk of colony winter loss
title_full_unstemmed Honey bee colony winter loss rates for 35 countries participating in the COLOSS survey for winter 2018–2019, and the effects of a new queen on the risk of colony winter loss
title_sort Honey bee colony winter loss rates for 35 countries participating in the COLOSS survey for winter 2018–2019, and the effects of a new queen on the risk of colony winter loss
author Gray, Alison
author_facet Gray, Alison
Adjlane, Noureddine
Arab, Alireza
Ballis, Alexis
Brusbardis, Valters
Charrière, Jean-Daniel
Chlebo, Robert
Coffey, Mary F.
Cornelissen, Bram
Costa, Cristina Amaro Da
Dahle, Bjørn
Danihlík, Jiří
Dražić, Marica Maja
Evans, Garth
Fedoriak, Mariia
Forsythe, Ivan
Gajda, Anna
de Graaf, Dirk C.
Gregorc, Aleš
Ilieva, Iliyana
Johannesen, Jes
Kauko, Lassi
Kristiansen, Preben
Martikkala, Maritta
Martín-Hernández, Raquel
Medina-Flores, Carlos Aurelio
Mutinelli, Franco
Patalano, Solenn
Raudmets, Aivar
Martin, Gilles San
Soroker, Victoria
Stevanovic, Jevrosima
Uzunov, Aleksandar
Vejsnaes, Flemming
Williams, Anthony
Zammit-Mangion, Marion
Brodschneider, Robert
author_role author
author2 Adjlane, Noureddine
Arab, Alireza
Ballis, Alexis
Brusbardis, Valters
Charrière, Jean-Daniel
Chlebo, Robert
Coffey, Mary F.
Cornelissen, Bram
Costa, Cristina Amaro Da
Dahle, Bjørn
Danihlík, Jiří
Dražić, Marica Maja
Evans, Garth
Fedoriak, Mariia
Forsythe, Ivan
Gajda, Anna
de Graaf, Dirk C.
Gregorc, Aleš
Ilieva, Iliyana
Johannesen, Jes
Kauko, Lassi
Kristiansen, Preben
Martikkala, Maritta
Martín-Hernández, Raquel
Medina-Flores, Carlos Aurelio
Mutinelli, Franco
Patalano, Solenn
Raudmets, Aivar
Martin, Gilles San
Soroker, Victoria
Stevanovic, Jevrosima
Uzunov, Aleksandar
Vejsnaes, Flemming
Williams, Anthony
Zammit-Mangion, Marion
Brodschneider, Robert
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Viseu
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gray, Alison
Adjlane, Noureddine
Arab, Alireza
Ballis, Alexis
Brusbardis, Valters
Charrière, Jean-Daniel
Chlebo, Robert
Coffey, Mary F.
Cornelissen, Bram
Costa, Cristina Amaro Da
Dahle, Bjørn
Danihlík, Jiří
Dražić, Marica Maja
Evans, Garth
Fedoriak, Mariia
Forsythe, Ivan
Gajda, Anna
de Graaf, Dirk C.
Gregorc, Aleš
Ilieva, Iliyana
Johannesen, Jes
Kauko, Lassi
Kristiansen, Preben
Martikkala, Maritta
Martín-Hernández, Raquel
Medina-Flores, Carlos Aurelio
Mutinelli, Franco
Patalano, Solenn
Raudmets, Aivar
Martin, Gilles San
Soroker, Victoria
Stevanovic, Jevrosima
Uzunov, Aleksandar
Vejsnaes, Flemming
Williams, Anthony
Zammit-Mangion, Marion
Brodschneider, Robert
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Beekeeping
Mortality
Colony winter losses
Monitoring surveys
Apis mellifera
topic Beekeeping
Mortality
Colony winter losses
Monitoring surveys
Apis mellifera
description This article presents managed honey bee colony loss rates over winter 2018/19 resulting from using the standardised COLOSS questionnaire in 35 countries (31 in Europe). In total, 28,629 beekeepers supplying valid loss data wintered 738,233 colonies, and reported 29,912 (4.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0–4.1%) colonies with unsolvable queen problems, 79,146 (10.7%, 95% CI 10.5–10.9%) dead colonies after winter and 13,895 colonies (1.9%, 95% CI 1.8–2.0%) lost through natural disaster. This gave an overall colony winter loss rate of 16.7% (95% CI 16.4–16.9%), varying greatly between countries, from 5.8% to 32.0%. We modelled the risk of loss as a dead/empty colony or from unresolvable queen problems, and found that, overall, larger beekeeping operations with more than 150 colonies experienced significantly lower losses (p < 0.001), consistent with earlier studies. Additionally, beekeepers included in this survey who did not migrate their colonies at least once in 2018 had significantly lower losses than those migrating (p < 0.001). The percentage of new queens from 2018 in wintered colonies was also examined as a potential risk factor. The percentage of colonies going into winter with a new queen was estimated as 55.0% over all countries. Higher percentages of young queens corresponded to lower overall losses (excluding losses from natural disaster), but also lower losses from unresolvable queen problems, and lower losses from winter mortality (p < 0.001). Detailed results for each country and overall are given in a table, and a map shows relative risks of winter loss at regional level.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-07T10:36:22Z
2020
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.19/6356
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.19/6356
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1080/00218839.2020.1797272
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130913627439104