Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Baroni, Pietro
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Fermé, Eduardo, Giacomin, Massimiliano, Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.13/4986
Resumo: This paper aims at comparing and relating belief revision and argumentation as approaches to model reasoning processes. Referring to some prominent literature references in both fields, we will discuss their (implicit or explicit) assumptions on the modeled processes and hence commonalities and differences in the forms of reason ing they are suitable to deal with. The intended contribution is on one hand assessing the (not fully explored yet) relationships between two lively research fields in the broad area of defeasible reasoning and on the other hand pointing out open issues and potential directions for future research.
id RCAP_3a47a418d224960e67a674b0c0be2780
oai_identifier_str oai:digituma.uma.pt:10400.13/4986
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparisonArgumentationTheoryBelief revisionDynamics of knowledgeKnowledge representationReasoning.Faculdade de Ciências Exatas e da EngenhariaThis paper aims at comparing and relating belief revision and argumentation as approaches to model reasoning processes. Referring to some prominent literature references in both fields, we will discuss their (implicit or explicit) assumptions on the modeled processes and hence commonalities and differences in the forms of reason ing they are suitable to deal with. The intended contribution is on one hand assessing the (not fully explored yet) relationships between two lively research fields in the broad area of defeasible reasoning and on the other hand pointing out open issues and potential directions for future research.SpringerDigitUMaBaroni, PietroFermé, EduardoGiacomin, MassimilianoSimari, Guillermo Ricardo2023-02-01T11:14:41Z20222022-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.13/4986engBaroni, P., Fermé, E., Giacomin, M. et al. Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison. J of Log Lang and Inf 31, 555–589 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-022-09369-810.1007/s10849-022-09369-8info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-02-05T03:30:27Zoai:digituma.uma.pt:10400.13/4986Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:46:12.420923Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison
title Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison
spellingShingle Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison
Baroni, Pietro
Argumentation
Theory
Belief revision
Dynamics of knowledge
Knowledge representation
Reasoning
.
Faculdade de Ciências Exatas e da Engenharia
title_short Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison
title_full Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison
title_fullStr Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison
title_full_unstemmed Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison
title_sort Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison
author Baroni, Pietro
author_facet Baroni, Pietro
Fermé, Eduardo
Giacomin, Massimiliano
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_role author
author2 Fermé, Eduardo
Giacomin, Massimiliano
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv DigitUMa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Baroni, Pietro
Fermé, Eduardo
Giacomin, Massimiliano
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Argumentation
Theory
Belief revision
Dynamics of knowledge
Knowledge representation
Reasoning
.
Faculdade de Ciências Exatas e da Engenharia
topic Argumentation
Theory
Belief revision
Dynamics of knowledge
Knowledge representation
Reasoning
.
Faculdade de Ciências Exatas e da Engenharia
description This paper aims at comparing and relating belief revision and argumentation as approaches to model reasoning processes. Referring to some prominent literature references in both fields, we will discuss their (implicit or explicit) assumptions on the modeled processes and hence commonalities and differences in the forms of reason ing they are suitable to deal with. The intended contribution is on one hand assessing the (not fully explored yet) relationships between two lively research fields in the broad area of defeasible reasoning and on the other hand pointing out open issues and potential directions for future research.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
2023-02-01T11:14:41Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.13/4986
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.13/4986
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Baroni, P., Fermé, E., Giacomin, M. et al. Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison. J of Log Lang and Inf 31, 555–589 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-022-09369-8
10.1007/s10849-022-09369-8
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130933645803520

Registros relacionados