Is it possible to have a consensual terminology in disc diseases?.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2001 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/1815 |
Resumo: | The large variety of concepts and classifications for disc disease (anatomical, pathological, surgical and radiological) are reflected in the, often ambiguous, terminology of degenerative disc disease used on imaging study reports by neuroradiologists and radiologists. The attempts to standardize the nomenclature, made by some medical societies, lack general acceptance. This work reflects the conviction that morphological characterization of disc disease prevails over the anatomopathological due to the limitations of imaging study techniques, including magnetic resonance imaging. |
id |
RCAP_3ac3032adfa095403364bf416b5279ab |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/1815 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Is it possible to have a consensual terminology in disc diseases?.E possível uma terminologia consensual na patologia discal?The large variety of concepts and classifications for disc disease (anatomical, pathological, surgical and radiological) are reflected in the, often ambiguous, terminology of degenerative disc disease used on imaging study reports by neuroradiologists and radiologists. The attempts to standardize the nomenclature, made by some medical societies, lack general acceptance. This work reflects the conviction that morphological characterization of disc disease prevails over the anatomopathological due to the limitations of imaging study techniques, including magnetic resonance imaging.The large variety of concepts and classifications for disc disease (anatomical, pathological, surgical and radiological) are reflected in the, often ambiguous, terminology of degenerative disc disease used on imaging study reports by neuroradiologists and radiologists. The attempts to standardize the nomenclature, made by some medical societies, lack general acceptance. This work reflects the conviction that morphological characterization of disc disease prevails over the anatomopathological due to the limitations of imaging study techniques, including magnetic resonance imaging.Ordem dos Médicos2001-02-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/1815oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/1815Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2001): Janeiro-Fevereiro; 7-11Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 14 N.º 1 (2001): Janeiro-Fevereiro; 7-111646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/1815https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/1815/1392Duarte, JMedina, Einfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T10:59:13Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/1815Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:17:25.036847Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is it possible to have a consensual terminology in disc diseases?. E possível uma terminologia consensual na patologia discal? |
title |
Is it possible to have a consensual terminology in disc diseases?. |
spellingShingle |
Is it possible to have a consensual terminology in disc diseases?. Duarte, J |
title_short |
Is it possible to have a consensual terminology in disc diseases?. |
title_full |
Is it possible to have a consensual terminology in disc diseases?. |
title_fullStr |
Is it possible to have a consensual terminology in disc diseases?. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is it possible to have a consensual terminology in disc diseases?. |
title_sort |
Is it possible to have a consensual terminology in disc diseases?. |
author |
Duarte, J |
author_facet |
Duarte, J Medina, E |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Medina, E |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Duarte, J Medina, E |
description |
The large variety of concepts and classifications for disc disease (anatomical, pathological, surgical and radiological) are reflected in the, often ambiguous, terminology of degenerative disc disease used on imaging study reports by neuroradiologists and radiologists. The attempts to standardize the nomenclature, made by some medical societies, lack general acceptance. This work reflects the conviction that morphological characterization of disc disease prevails over the anatomopathological due to the limitations of imaging study techniques, including magnetic resonance imaging. |
publishDate |
2001 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2001-02-27 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/1815 oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/1815 |
url |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/1815 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/1815 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/1815 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/1815/1392 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2001): Janeiro-Fevereiro; 7-11 Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 14 N.º 1 (2001): Janeiro-Fevereiro; 7-11 1646-0758 0870-399X reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130627139698688 |