Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cachim, Afonso
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Pereira, Ana Margarida, Almeida, Rute, Amaral, Rita, Correia, Magna Alves, Marques, Pedro Vieira, Loureiro, Cláudia Chaves, Ribeiro, Carmelita, Cardia, Francisca, Gomes, Joana, Vidal, Carmen, Silva, Eurico, Rocha, Sara, Rocha, Diana, Marques, Maria Luís, Páscoa, Rosália, Morais, Daniela, Cruz, Ana Margarida, Santalha, Marta, Simões, José Augusto Rodrigues, Silva, Sofia da, Silva, Diana, Gerardo, Rita, Bom, Filipa Todo, Morete, Ana, Vieira, Inês, Vieira, Pedro, Monteiro, Rosário, Raimundo, Rosário, Monteiro, Luís, Neves, Ângela, Santos, Carlos, Penas, Ana Margarida, Regadas, Rita, Marques, José Varanda, Rosendo, Inês, Aguiar, Margarida Abreu, Fernandes, Sara, Cardoso, Carlos Seiça, Pimenta, F., Meireles, Patrícia, Gonçalves, Mariana, Fonseca, Joao A, Jácome, Cristina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/12906
Resumo: Background Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using an asthma app to support medication management and adherence but failed to compare with other measures currently used in clinical practice. However, in a clinical setting, any additional adherence measurement must be evaluated in the context of both the patient and physician perspectives so that it can also help improve the process of shared decision making. Thus, we aimed to compare different measures of adherence to asthma control inhalers in clinical practice, namely through an app, patient self-report and physician assessment. Methods This study is a secondary analysis of three prospective multicentre observational studies with patients (≥13 years old) with persistent asthma recruited from 61 primary and secondary care centres in Portugal. Patients were invited to use the InspirerMundi app and register their inhaled medication. Adherence was measured by the app as the number of doses taken divided by the number of doses scheduled each day and two time points were considered for analysis: 1-week and 1-month. At baseline, patients and physicians independently assessed adherence to asthma control inhalers during the previous week using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0–100). Results A total of 193 patients (72% female; median [P25–P75] age 28 [19–41] years old) were included in the analysis. Adherence measured by the app was lower (1 week: 31 [0–71]%; 1 month: 18 [0–48]%) than patient self-report (80 [60–95]) and physician assessment (82 [51–94]) (p < 0.001). A negligible non-significant correlation was found between the app and subjective measurements (ρ 0.118–0.156, p > 0.05). There was a moderate correlation between patient self-report and physician assessment (ρ = 0.596, p < 0.001). Conclusions Adherence measured by the app was lower than that reported by the patient or the physician. This was expected as objective measurements are commonly lower than subjective evaluations, which tend to overestimate adherence. Nevertheless, the low adherence measured by the app may also be influenced by the use of the app itself and this needs to be considered in future studies.
id RCAP_3b21ffb4135452c68ef3328fe44dd912
oai_identifier_str oai:ubibliorum.ubi.pt:10400.6/12906
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessmentAsthmaClinical decision support systemseHealthMedication adherencemHealthMobile appsPatient participationSelf-managementSmartphoneTechnology assessmentBackground Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using an asthma app to support medication management and adherence but failed to compare with other measures currently used in clinical practice. However, in a clinical setting, any additional adherence measurement must be evaluated in the context of both the patient and physician perspectives so that it can also help improve the process of shared decision making. Thus, we aimed to compare different measures of adherence to asthma control inhalers in clinical practice, namely through an app, patient self-report and physician assessment. Methods This study is a secondary analysis of three prospective multicentre observational studies with patients (≥13 years old) with persistent asthma recruited from 61 primary and secondary care centres in Portugal. Patients were invited to use the InspirerMundi app and register their inhaled medication. Adherence was measured by the app as the number of doses taken divided by the number of doses scheduled each day and two time points were considered for analysis: 1-week and 1-month. At baseline, patients and physicians independently assessed adherence to asthma control inhalers during the previous week using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0–100). Results A total of 193 patients (72% female; median [P25–P75] age 28 [19–41] years old) were included in the analysis. Adherence measured by the app was lower (1 week: 31 [0–71]%; 1 month: 18 [0–48]%) than patient self-report (80 [60–95]) and physician assessment (82 [51–94]) (p < 0.001). A negligible non-significant correlation was found between the app and subjective measurements (ρ 0.118–0.156, p > 0.05). There was a moderate correlation between patient self-report and physician assessment (ρ = 0.596, p < 0.001). Conclusions Adherence measured by the app was lower than that reported by the patient or the physician. This was expected as objective measurements are commonly lower than subjective evaluations, which tend to overestimate adherence. Nevertheless, the low adherence measured by the app may also be influenced by the use of the app itself and this needs to be considered in future studies.Wiley Online LibraryuBibliorumCachim, AfonsoPereira, Ana MargaridaAlmeida, RuteAmaral, RitaCorreia, Magna AlvesMarques, Pedro VieiraLoureiro, Cláudia ChavesRibeiro, CarmelitaCardia, FranciscaGomes, JoanaVidal, CarmenSilva, EuricoRocha, SaraRocha, DianaMarques, Maria LuísPáscoa, RosáliaMorais, DanielaCruz, Ana MargaridaSantalha, MartaSimões, José Augusto RodriguesSilva, Sofia daSilva, DianaGerardo, RitaBom, Filipa TodoMorete, AnaVieira, InêsVieira, PedroMonteiro, RosárioRaimundo, RosárioMonteiro, LuísNeves, ÂngelaSantos, CarlosPenas, Ana MargaridaRegadas, RitaMarques, José VarandaRosendo, InêsAguiar, Margarida AbreuFernandes, SaraCardoso, Carlos SeiçaPimenta, F.Meireles, PatríciaGonçalves, MarianaFonseca, Joao AJácome, Cristina2023-02-17T09:40:32Z2023-02-152023-02-15T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/12906engCachim, A, Pereira, AM, Almeida, R, et al. Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: comparison among an asthma app, patient self-report and physician assessment. Clin Transl Allergy. 2023;e12210.10.1002/clt2.12210info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-11-27T12:41:24Zoai:ubibliorum.ubi.pt:10400.6/12906Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-11-27T12:41:24Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessment
title Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessment
spellingShingle Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessment
Cachim, Afonso
Asthma
Clinical decision support systems
eHealth
Medication adherence
mHealth
Mobile apps
Patient participation
Self-management
Smartphone
Technology assessment
title_short Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessment
title_full Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessment
title_fullStr Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessment
title_full_unstemmed Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessment
title_sort Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessment
author Cachim, Afonso
author_facet Cachim, Afonso
Pereira, Ana Margarida
Almeida, Rute
Amaral, Rita
Correia, Magna Alves
Marques, Pedro Vieira
Loureiro, Cláudia Chaves
Ribeiro, Carmelita
Cardia, Francisca
Gomes, Joana
Vidal, Carmen
Silva, Eurico
Rocha, Sara
Rocha, Diana
Marques, Maria Luís
Páscoa, Rosália
Morais, Daniela
Cruz, Ana Margarida
Santalha, Marta
Simões, José Augusto Rodrigues
Silva, Sofia da
Silva, Diana
Gerardo, Rita
Bom, Filipa Todo
Morete, Ana
Vieira, Inês
Vieira, Pedro
Monteiro, Rosário
Raimundo, Rosário
Monteiro, Luís
Neves, Ângela
Santos, Carlos
Penas, Ana Margarida
Regadas, Rita
Marques, José Varanda
Rosendo, Inês
Aguiar, Margarida Abreu
Fernandes, Sara
Cardoso, Carlos Seiça
Pimenta, F.
Meireles, Patrícia
Gonçalves, Mariana
Fonseca, Joao A
Jácome, Cristina
author_role author
author2 Pereira, Ana Margarida
Almeida, Rute
Amaral, Rita
Correia, Magna Alves
Marques, Pedro Vieira
Loureiro, Cláudia Chaves
Ribeiro, Carmelita
Cardia, Francisca
Gomes, Joana
Vidal, Carmen
Silva, Eurico
Rocha, Sara
Rocha, Diana
Marques, Maria Luís
Páscoa, Rosália
Morais, Daniela
Cruz, Ana Margarida
Santalha, Marta
Simões, José Augusto Rodrigues
Silva, Sofia da
Silva, Diana
Gerardo, Rita
Bom, Filipa Todo
Morete, Ana
Vieira, Inês
Vieira, Pedro
Monteiro, Rosário
Raimundo, Rosário
Monteiro, Luís
Neves, Ângela
Santos, Carlos
Penas, Ana Margarida
Regadas, Rita
Marques, José Varanda
Rosendo, Inês
Aguiar, Margarida Abreu
Fernandes, Sara
Cardoso, Carlos Seiça
Pimenta, F.
Meireles, Patrícia
Gonçalves, Mariana
Fonseca, Joao A
Jácome, Cristina
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv uBibliorum
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cachim, Afonso
Pereira, Ana Margarida
Almeida, Rute
Amaral, Rita
Correia, Magna Alves
Marques, Pedro Vieira
Loureiro, Cláudia Chaves
Ribeiro, Carmelita
Cardia, Francisca
Gomes, Joana
Vidal, Carmen
Silva, Eurico
Rocha, Sara
Rocha, Diana
Marques, Maria Luís
Páscoa, Rosália
Morais, Daniela
Cruz, Ana Margarida
Santalha, Marta
Simões, José Augusto Rodrigues
Silva, Sofia da
Silva, Diana
Gerardo, Rita
Bom, Filipa Todo
Morete, Ana
Vieira, Inês
Vieira, Pedro
Monteiro, Rosário
Raimundo, Rosário
Monteiro, Luís
Neves, Ângela
Santos, Carlos
Penas, Ana Margarida
Regadas, Rita
Marques, José Varanda
Rosendo, Inês
Aguiar, Margarida Abreu
Fernandes, Sara
Cardoso, Carlos Seiça
Pimenta, F.
Meireles, Patrícia
Gonçalves, Mariana
Fonseca, Joao A
Jácome, Cristina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Asthma
Clinical decision support systems
eHealth
Medication adherence
mHealth
Mobile apps
Patient participation
Self-management
Smartphone
Technology assessment
topic Asthma
Clinical decision support systems
eHealth
Medication adherence
mHealth
Mobile apps
Patient participation
Self-management
Smartphone
Technology assessment
description Background Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using an asthma app to support medication management and adherence but failed to compare with other measures currently used in clinical practice. However, in a clinical setting, any additional adherence measurement must be evaluated in the context of both the patient and physician perspectives so that it can also help improve the process of shared decision making. Thus, we aimed to compare different measures of adherence to asthma control inhalers in clinical practice, namely through an app, patient self-report and physician assessment. Methods This study is a secondary analysis of three prospective multicentre observational studies with patients (≥13 years old) with persistent asthma recruited from 61 primary and secondary care centres in Portugal. Patients were invited to use the InspirerMundi app and register their inhaled medication. Adherence was measured by the app as the number of doses taken divided by the number of doses scheduled each day and two time points were considered for analysis: 1-week and 1-month. At baseline, patients and physicians independently assessed adherence to asthma control inhalers during the previous week using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0–100). Results A total of 193 patients (72% female; median [P25–P75] age 28 [19–41] years old) were included in the analysis. Adherence measured by the app was lower (1 week: 31 [0–71]%; 1 month: 18 [0–48]%) than patient self-report (80 [60–95]) and physician assessment (82 [51–94]) (p < 0.001). A negligible non-significant correlation was found between the app and subjective measurements (ρ 0.118–0.156, p > 0.05). There was a moderate correlation between patient self-report and physician assessment (ρ = 0.596, p < 0.001). Conclusions Adherence measured by the app was lower than that reported by the patient or the physician. This was expected as objective measurements are commonly lower than subjective evaluations, which tend to overestimate adherence. Nevertheless, the low adherence measured by the app may also be influenced by the use of the app itself and this needs to be considered in future studies.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-02-17T09:40:32Z
2023-02-15
2023-02-15T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/12906
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/12906
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Cachim, A, Pereira, AM, Almeida, R, et al. Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: comparison among an asthma app, patient self-report and physician assessment. Clin Transl Allergy. 2023;e12210.
10.1002/clt2.12210
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Online Library
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Online Library
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mluisa.alvim@gmail.com
_version_ 1817549669628116992