Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessment
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/12906 |
Resumo: | Background Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using an asthma app to support medication management and adherence but failed to compare with other measures currently used in clinical practice. However, in a clinical setting, any additional adherence measurement must be evaluated in the context of both the patient and physician perspectives so that it can also help improve the process of shared decision making. Thus, we aimed to compare different measures of adherence to asthma control inhalers in clinical practice, namely through an app, patient self-report and physician assessment. Methods This study is a secondary analysis of three prospective multicentre observational studies with patients (≥13 years old) with persistent asthma recruited from 61 primary and secondary care centres in Portugal. Patients were invited to use the InspirerMundi app and register their inhaled medication. Adherence was measured by the app as the number of doses taken divided by the number of doses scheduled each day and two time points were considered for analysis: 1-week and 1-month. At baseline, patients and physicians independently assessed adherence to asthma control inhalers during the previous week using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0–100). Results A total of 193 patients (72% female; median [P25–P75] age 28 [19–41] years old) were included in the analysis. Adherence measured by the app was lower (1 week: 31 [0–71]%; 1 month: 18 [0–48]%) than patient self-report (80 [60–95]) and physician assessment (82 [51–94]) (p < 0.001). A negligible non-significant correlation was found between the app and subjective measurements (ρ 0.118–0.156, p > 0.05). There was a moderate correlation between patient self-report and physician assessment (ρ = 0.596, p < 0.001). Conclusions Adherence measured by the app was lower than that reported by the patient or the physician. This was expected as objective measurements are commonly lower than subjective evaluations, which tend to overestimate adherence. Nevertheless, the low adherence measured by the app may also be influenced by the use of the app itself and this needs to be considered in future studies. |
id |
RCAP_3b21ffb4135452c68ef3328fe44dd912 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ubibliorum.ubi.pt:10400.6/12906 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessmentAsthmaClinical decision support systemseHealthMedication adherencemHealthMobile appsPatient participationSelf-managementSmartphoneTechnology assessmentBackground Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using an asthma app to support medication management and adherence but failed to compare with other measures currently used in clinical practice. However, in a clinical setting, any additional adherence measurement must be evaluated in the context of both the patient and physician perspectives so that it can also help improve the process of shared decision making. Thus, we aimed to compare different measures of adherence to asthma control inhalers in clinical practice, namely through an app, patient self-report and physician assessment. Methods This study is a secondary analysis of three prospective multicentre observational studies with patients (≥13 years old) with persistent asthma recruited from 61 primary and secondary care centres in Portugal. Patients were invited to use the InspirerMundi app and register their inhaled medication. Adherence was measured by the app as the number of doses taken divided by the number of doses scheduled each day and two time points were considered for analysis: 1-week and 1-month. At baseline, patients and physicians independently assessed adherence to asthma control inhalers during the previous week using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0–100). Results A total of 193 patients (72% female; median [P25–P75] age 28 [19–41] years old) were included in the analysis. Adherence measured by the app was lower (1 week: 31 [0–71]%; 1 month: 18 [0–48]%) than patient self-report (80 [60–95]) and physician assessment (82 [51–94]) (p < 0.001). A negligible non-significant correlation was found between the app and subjective measurements (ρ 0.118–0.156, p > 0.05). There was a moderate correlation between patient self-report and physician assessment (ρ = 0.596, p < 0.001). Conclusions Adherence measured by the app was lower than that reported by the patient or the physician. This was expected as objective measurements are commonly lower than subjective evaluations, which tend to overestimate adherence. Nevertheless, the low adherence measured by the app may also be influenced by the use of the app itself and this needs to be considered in future studies.Wiley Online LibraryuBibliorumCachim, AfonsoPereira, Ana MargaridaAlmeida, RuteAmaral, RitaCorreia, Magna AlvesMarques, Pedro VieiraLoureiro, Cláudia ChavesRibeiro, CarmelitaCardia, FranciscaGomes, JoanaVidal, CarmenSilva, EuricoRocha, SaraRocha, DianaMarques, Maria LuísPáscoa, RosáliaMorais, DanielaCruz, Ana MargaridaSantalha, MartaSimões, José Augusto RodriguesSilva, Sofia daSilva, DianaGerardo, RitaBom, Filipa TodoMorete, AnaVieira, InêsVieira, PedroMonteiro, RosárioRaimundo, RosárioMonteiro, LuísNeves, ÂngelaSantos, CarlosPenas, Ana MargaridaRegadas, RitaMarques, José VarandaRosendo, InêsAguiar, Margarida AbreuFernandes, SaraCardoso, Carlos SeiçaPimenta, F.Meireles, PatríciaGonçalves, MarianaFonseca, Joao AJácome, Cristina2023-02-17T09:40:32Z2023-02-152023-02-15T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/12906engCachim, A, Pereira, AM, Almeida, R, et al. Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: comparison among an asthma app, patient self-report and physician assessment. Clin Transl Allergy. 2023;e12210.10.1002/clt2.12210info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-11-27T12:41:24Zoai:ubibliorum.ubi.pt:10400.6/12906Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-11-27T12:41:24Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessment |
title |
Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessment |
spellingShingle |
Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessment Cachim, Afonso Asthma Clinical decision support systems eHealth Medication adherence mHealth Mobile apps Patient participation Self-management Smartphone Technology assessment |
title_short |
Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessment |
title_full |
Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessment |
title_fullStr |
Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessment |
title_sort |
Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessment |
author |
Cachim, Afonso |
author_facet |
Cachim, Afonso Pereira, Ana Margarida Almeida, Rute Amaral, Rita Correia, Magna Alves Marques, Pedro Vieira Loureiro, Cláudia Chaves Ribeiro, Carmelita Cardia, Francisca Gomes, Joana Vidal, Carmen Silva, Eurico Rocha, Sara Rocha, Diana Marques, Maria Luís Páscoa, Rosália Morais, Daniela Cruz, Ana Margarida Santalha, Marta Simões, José Augusto Rodrigues Silva, Sofia da Silva, Diana Gerardo, Rita Bom, Filipa Todo Morete, Ana Vieira, Inês Vieira, Pedro Monteiro, Rosário Raimundo, Rosário Monteiro, Luís Neves, Ângela Santos, Carlos Penas, Ana Margarida Regadas, Rita Marques, José Varanda Rosendo, Inês Aguiar, Margarida Abreu Fernandes, Sara Cardoso, Carlos Seiça Pimenta, F. Meireles, Patrícia Gonçalves, Mariana Fonseca, Joao A Jácome, Cristina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira, Ana Margarida Almeida, Rute Amaral, Rita Correia, Magna Alves Marques, Pedro Vieira Loureiro, Cláudia Chaves Ribeiro, Carmelita Cardia, Francisca Gomes, Joana Vidal, Carmen Silva, Eurico Rocha, Sara Rocha, Diana Marques, Maria Luís Páscoa, Rosália Morais, Daniela Cruz, Ana Margarida Santalha, Marta Simões, José Augusto Rodrigues Silva, Sofia da Silva, Diana Gerardo, Rita Bom, Filipa Todo Morete, Ana Vieira, Inês Vieira, Pedro Monteiro, Rosário Raimundo, Rosário Monteiro, Luís Neves, Ângela Santos, Carlos Penas, Ana Margarida Regadas, Rita Marques, José Varanda Rosendo, Inês Aguiar, Margarida Abreu Fernandes, Sara Cardoso, Carlos Seiça Pimenta, F. Meireles, Patrícia Gonçalves, Mariana Fonseca, Joao A Jácome, Cristina |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
uBibliorum |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cachim, Afonso Pereira, Ana Margarida Almeida, Rute Amaral, Rita Correia, Magna Alves Marques, Pedro Vieira Loureiro, Cláudia Chaves Ribeiro, Carmelita Cardia, Francisca Gomes, Joana Vidal, Carmen Silva, Eurico Rocha, Sara Rocha, Diana Marques, Maria Luís Páscoa, Rosália Morais, Daniela Cruz, Ana Margarida Santalha, Marta Simões, José Augusto Rodrigues Silva, Sofia da Silva, Diana Gerardo, Rita Bom, Filipa Todo Morete, Ana Vieira, Inês Vieira, Pedro Monteiro, Rosário Raimundo, Rosário Monteiro, Luís Neves, Ângela Santos, Carlos Penas, Ana Margarida Regadas, Rita Marques, José Varanda Rosendo, Inês Aguiar, Margarida Abreu Fernandes, Sara Cardoso, Carlos Seiça Pimenta, F. Meireles, Patrícia Gonçalves, Mariana Fonseca, Joao A Jácome, Cristina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Asthma Clinical decision support systems eHealth Medication adherence mHealth Mobile apps Patient participation Self-management Smartphone Technology assessment |
topic |
Asthma Clinical decision support systems eHealth Medication adherence mHealth Mobile apps Patient participation Self-management Smartphone Technology assessment |
description |
Background Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using an asthma app to support medication management and adherence but failed to compare with other measures currently used in clinical practice. However, in a clinical setting, any additional adherence measurement must be evaluated in the context of both the patient and physician perspectives so that it can also help improve the process of shared decision making. Thus, we aimed to compare different measures of adherence to asthma control inhalers in clinical practice, namely through an app, patient self-report and physician assessment. Methods This study is a secondary analysis of three prospective multicentre observational studies with patients (≥13 years old) with persistent asthma recruited from 61 primary and secondary care centres in Portugal. Patients were invited to use the InspirerMundi app and register their inhaled medication. Adherence was measured by the app as the number of doses taken divided by the number of doses scheduled each day and two time points were considered for analysis: 1-week and 1-month. At baseline, patients and physicians independently assessed adherence to asthma control inhalers during the previous week using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0–100). Results A total of 193 patients (72% female; median [P25–P75] age 28 [19–41] years old) were included in the analysis. Adherence measured by the app was lower (1 week: 31 [0–71]%; 1 month: 18 [0–48]%) than patient self-report (80 [60–95]) and physician assessment (82 [51–94]) (p < 0.001). A negligible non-significant correlation was found between the app and subjective measurements (ρ 0.118–0.156, p > 0.05). There was a moderate correlation between patient self-report and physician assessment (ρ = 0.596, p < 0.001). Conclusions Adherence measured by the app was lower than that reported by the patient or the physician. This was expected as objective measurements are commonly lower than subjective evaluations, which tend to overestimate adherence. Nevertheless, the low adherence measured by the app may also be influenced by the use of the app itself and this needs to be considered in future studies. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-02-17T09:40:32Z 2023-02-15 2023-02-15T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/12906 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/12906 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Cachim, A, Pereira, AM, Almeida, R, et al. Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: comparison among an asthma app, patient self-report and physician assessment. Clin Transl Allergy. 2023;e12210. 10.1002/clt2.12210 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley Online Library |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley Online Library |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mluisa.alvim@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1817549669628116992 |