Pharmacological treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis: What is the evidence?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Ana Isabel
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Magalhães, Tiago
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v29i5.11164
Resumo: Objective: The objective of this study was to review the evidence for the most effective pharmacological treatment for idiopathic peripheral facial paralysis using corticosteroids and antiviral agents. Data sources: PubMed, evidence based medicine websites, Portuguese Medical Journal Index and references of selected articles were searched. Methodology: An electronic database search was conducted for clinical guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analysis (MA) and randomized controlled clinical trials, published between 01/2005 and 04/2012, in English and Portuguese, using the MeSH terms: Glucocorticoids; Antiviral Agents; Bell Palsy; Facial Paralysis. The Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) of the American Family Physician was used for the assessment of levels of evidence (LE) and the strength of recommendations. Results: Of the 181 articles found, seven MA were included. Three MA found significant clinical benefit from corticosteroid therapy compared to placebo treatment (LE 1). The use of antiviral drugs was no better than placebo in two studies (LE 2). The combination of corticosteroids and antiviral drugs was found to be similar to isolated corticosteroid therapy in two studies. In four studies, increased benefit from combination therapy was found compared to corticosteroid treatment alone, though this difference was not statistically significant. Benefit from the combination treatment was possibly more likely in cases of severe paralysis (LE 2). Conclusions: Evidence is strongest for the benefits of corticosteroids in the treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis (Recommendation A). There is no evidence of benefit for antiviral drugs either alone or in combination with corticosteroids in the treatment of Bell’s palsy (Recommendation B). In patients with severe paralysis, there may be a small benefit in adding an antiviral drug to steroid therapy (Recommendation B). Numerous methodological limitations in the reported studies as well as the heterogeneity between studies were noted.
id RCAP_3cd8df2310d16acf43dee3f42e3fbcbe
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/11164
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Pharmacological treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis: What is the evidence?Tratamento farmacológico da Paralisia Facial Periférica Idiopática: qual a evidência?Idiopathic Peripheral Facial PalsyBell’s PalsyCorticosteroidsAntiviralsParalisia Facial Periférica IdiopáticaParalisia de BellCorticosteroidesAntivíricosObjective: The objective of this study was to review the evidence for the most effective pharmacological treatment for idiopathic peripheral facial paralysis using corticosteroids and antiviral agents. Data sources: PubMed, evidence based medicine websites, Portuguese Medical Journal Index and references of selected articles were searched. Methodology: An electronic database search was conducted for clinical guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analysis (MA) and randomized controlled clinical trials, published between 01/2005 and 04/2012, in English and Portuguese, using the MeSH terms: Glucocorticoids; Antiviral Agents; Bell Palsy; Facial Paralysis. The Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) of the American Family Physician was used for the assessment of levels of evidence (LE) and the strength of recommendations. Results: Of the 181 articles found, seven MA were included. Three MA found significant clinical benefit from corticosteroid therapy compared to placebo treatment (LE 1). The use of antiviral drugs was no better than placebo in two studies (LE 2). The combination of corticosteroids and antiviral drugs was found to be similar to isolated corticosteroid therapy in two studies. In four studies, increased benefit from combination therapy was found compared to corticosteroid treatment alone, though this difference was not statistically significant. Benefit from the combination treatment was possibly more likely in cases of severe paralysis (LE 2). Conclusions: Evidence is strongest for the benefits of corticosteroids in the treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis (Recommendation A). There is no evidence of benefit for antiviral drugs either alone or in combination with corticosteroids in the treatment of Bell’s palsy (Recommendation B). In patients with severe paralysis, there may be a small benefit in adding an antiviral drug to steroid therapy (Recommendation B). Numerous methodological limitations in the reported studies as well as the heterogeneity between studies were noted.Objetivo: Rever o tratamento farmacológico mais eficaz, entre corticoides e antivíricos, na melhoria clínica da Paralisia Facial Periférica Idiopática. Fontes de dados: Pubmed, sítios de medicina baseada na evidência, Índex de Revistas Médicas Portuguesas e referências bibliográficas dos artigos selecionados. Métodos de Revisão: Foi realizada uma pesquisa de normas de orientação clínica, revisões sistemáticas, meta-análises (MA) e ensaios clínicos aleatorizados e controlados, publicados entre 01/2005 e 04/2012, em inglês e português, utilizando os termos MeSH: Glucocorticoids; Antiviral Agents; Bell Palsy; Facial Paralysis. Para avaliação dos níveis de evidência (NE) e atribuição de forças de recomendação foi utilizada a escala Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) da American Family Physician. Resultados: Foram encontrados 181 artigos, dos quais foram selecionados sete MA. Três MA suportam de forma consistente e significativa o benefício clínico do uso de corticoide versus placebo (NE 1). O uso de antivíricos não foi melhor que o placebo em dois estudos (NE 2). A combinação de corticoide e antivírico foi semelhante ao corticoide isolado em dois estudos e em quatro estudos foi reportado um benefício da combinação relativamente ao uso isolado de corticoide, sem significado estatístico. Este benefício da combinação de corticoide e antivírico foi potencialmente mais relevante em casos de paralisia severa (NE 2). Conclusões: A corticoterapia continua a ser o tratamento com a melhor evidência clínica (Recomendação A). Não existe evidência de benefício dos antivíricos, isoladamente ou em associação com corticoides, no tratamento da Paralisia de Bell (Recomendação B). Em doentes com paralisia severa poderá, potencialmente, existir um pequeno benefício na adição de antivíricos à terapêutica com corticoides (Recomendação B). São de realçar as diversas limitações metodológicas, assim como a heterogeneidade dos estudos.Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar2013-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v29i5.11164https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v29i5.11164Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 29 No. 5 (2013): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 308-314Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 29 Núm. 5 (2013): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 308-314Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 29 N.º 5 (2013): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 308-3142182-51812182-517310.32385/rpmgf.v29i5reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11164https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11164/10890Silva, Ana IsabelMagalhães, Tiagoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-17T11:59:41Zoai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/11164Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-09-17T11:59:41Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pharmacological treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis: What is the evidence?
Tratamento farmacológico da Paralisia Facial Periférica Idiopática: qual a evidência?
title Pharmacological treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis: What is the evidence?
spellingShingle Pharmacological treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis: What is the evidence?
Silva, Ana Isabel
Idiopathic Peripheral Facial Palsy
Bell’s Palsy
Corticosteroids
Antivirals
Paralisia Facial Periférica Idiopática
Paralisia de Bell
Corticosteroides
Antivíricos
title_short Pharmacological treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis: What is the evidence?
title_full Pharmacological treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis: What is the evidence?
title_fullStr Pharmacological treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis: What is the evidence?
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacological treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis: What is the evidence?
title_sort Pharmacological treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis: What is the evidence?
author Silva, Ana Isabel
author_facet Silva, Ana Isabel
Magalhães, Tiago
author_role author
author2 Magalhães, Tiago
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Ana Isabel
Magalhães, Tiago
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Idiopathic Peripheral Facial Palsy
Bell’s Palsy
Corticosteroids
Antivirals
Paralisia Facial Periférica Idiopática
Paralisia de Bell
Corticosteroides
Antivíricos
topic Idiopathic Peripheral Facial Palsy
Bell’s Palsy
Corticosteroids
Antivirals
Paralisia Facial Periférica Idiopática
Paralisia de Bell
Corticosteroides
Antivíricos
description Objective: The objective of this study was to review the evidence for the most effective pharmacological treatment for idiopathic peripheral facial paralysis using corticosteroids and antiviral agents. Data sources: PubMed, evidence based medicine websites, Portuguese Medical Journal Index and references of selected articles were searched. Methodology: An electronic database search was conducted for clinical guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analysis (MA) and randomized controlled clinical trials, published between 01/2005 and 04/2012, in English and Portuguese, using the MeSH terms: Glucocorticoids; Antiviral Agents; Bell Palsy; Facial Paralysis. The Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) of the American Family Physician was used for the assessment of levels of evidence (LE) and the strength of recommendations. Results: Of the 181 articles found, seven MA were included. Three MA found significant clinical benefit from corticosteroid therapy compared to placebo treatment (LE 1). The use of antiviral drugs was no better than placebo in two studies (LE 2). The combination of corticosteroids and antiviral drugs was found to be similar to isolated corticosteroid therapy in two studies. In four studies, increased benefit from combination therapy was found compared to corticosteroid treatment alone, though this difference was not statistically significant. Benefit from the combination treatment was possibly more likely in cases of severe paralysis (LE 2). Conclusions: Evidence is strongest for the benefits of corticosteroids in the treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis (Recommendation A). There is no evidence of benefit for antiviral drugs either alone or in combination with corticosteroids in the treatment of Bell’s palsy (Recommendation B). In patients with severe paralysis, there may be a small benefit in adding an antiviral drug to steroid therapy (Recommendation B). Numerous methodological limitations in the reported studies as well as the heterogeneity between studies were noted.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-09-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v29i5.11164
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v29i5.11164
url https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v29i5.11164
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11164
https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11164/10890
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 29 No. 5 (2013): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 308-314
Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 29 Núm. 5 (2013): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 308-314
Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 29 N.º 5 (2013): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 308-314
2182-5181
2182-5173
10.32385/rpmgf.v29i5
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mluisa.alvim@gmail.com
_version_ 1817547194307182592