Pharmacological treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis: What is the evidence?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v29i5.11164 |
Resumo: | Objective: The objective of this study was to review the evidence for the most effective pharmacological treatment for idiopathic peripheral facial paralysis using corticosteroids and antiviral agents. Data sources: PubMed, evidence based medicine websites, Portuguese Medical Journal Index and references of selected articles were searched. Methodology: An electronic database search was conducted for clinical guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analysis (MA) and randomized controlled clinical trials, published between 01/2005 and 04/2012, in English and Portuguese, using the MeSH terms: Glucocorticoids; Antiviral Agents; Bell Palsy; Facial Paralysis. The Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) of the American Family Physician was used for the assessment of levels of evidence (LE) and the strength of recommendations. Results: Of the 181 articles found, seven MA were included. Three MA found significant clinical benefit from corticosteroid therapy compared to placebo treatment (LE 1). The use of antiviral drugs was no better than placebo in two studies (LE 2). The combination of corticosteroids and antiviral drugs was found to be similar to isolated corticosteroid therapy in two studies. In four studies, increased benefit from combination therapy was found compared to corticosteroid treatment alone, though this difference was not statistically significant. Benefit from the combination treatment was possibly more likely in cases of severe paralysis (LE 2). Conclusions: Evidence is strongest for the benefits of corticosteroids in the treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis (Recommendation A). There is no evidence of benefit for antiviral drugs either alone or in combination with corticosteroids in the treatment of Bell’s palsy (Recommendation B). In patients with severe paralysis, there may be a small benefit in adding an antiviral drug to steroid therapy (Recommendation B). Numerous methodological limitations in the reported studies as well as the heterogeneity between studies were noted. |
id |
RCAP_3cd8df2310d16acf43dee3f42e3fbcbe |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/11164 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Pharmacological treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis: What is the evidence?Tratamento farmacológico da Paralisia Facial Periférica Idiopática: qual a evidência?Idiopathic Peripheral Facial PalsyBell’s PalsyCorticosteroidsAntiviralsParalisia Facial Periférica IdiopáticaParalisia de BellCorticosteroidesAntivíricosObjective: The objective of this study was to review the evidence for the most effective pharmacological treatment for idiopathic peripheral facial paralysis using corticosteroids and antiviral agents. Data sources: PubMed, evidence based medicine websites, Portuguese Medical Journal Index and references of selected articles were searched. Methodology: An electronic database search was conducted for clinical guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analysis (MA) and randomized controlled clinical trials, published between 01/2005 and 04/2012, in English and Portuguese, using the MeSH terms: Glucocorticoids; Antiviral Agents; Bell Palsy; Facial Paralysis. The Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) of the American Family Physician was used for the assessment of levels of evidence (LE) and the strength of recommendations. Results: Of the 181 articles found, seven MA were included. Three MA found significant clinical benefit from corticosteroid therapy compared to placebo treatment (LE 1). The use of antiviral drugs was no better than placebo in two studies (LE 2). The combination of corticosteroids and antiviral drugs was found to be similar to isolated corticosteroid therapy in two studies. In four studies, increased benefit from combination therapy was found compared to corticosteroid treatment alone, though this difference was not statistically significant. Benefit from the combination treatment was possibly more likely in cases of severe paralysis (LE 2). Conclusions: Evidence is strongest for the benefits of corticosteroids in the treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis (Recommendation A). There is no evidence of benefit for antiviral drugs either alone or in combination with corticosteroids in the treatment of Bell’s palsy (Recommendation B). In patients with severe paralysis, there may be a small benefit in adding an antiviral drug to steroid therapy (Recommendation B). Numerous methodological limitations in the reported studies as well as the heterogeneity between studies were noted.Objetivo: Rever o tratamento farmacológico mais eficaz, entre corticoides e antivíricos, na melhoria clínica da Paralisia Facial Periférica Idiopática. Fontes de dados: Pubmed, sítios de medicina baseada na evidência, Índex de Revistas Médicas Portuguesas e referências bibliográficas dos artigos selecionados. Métodos de Revisão: Foi realizada uma pesquisa de normas de orientação clínica, revisões sistemáticas, meta-análises (MA) e ensaios clínicos aleatorizados e controlados, publicados entre 01/2005 e 04/2012, em inglês e português, utilizando os termos MeSH: Glucocorticoids; Antiviral Agents; Bell Palsy; Facial Paralysis. Para avaliação dos níveis de evidência (NE) e atribuição de forças de recomendação foi utilizada a escala Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) da American Family Physician. Resultados: Foram encontrados 181 artigos, dos quais foram selecionados sete MA. Três MA suportam de forma consistente e significativa o benefício clínico do uso de corticoide versus placebo (NE 1). O uso de antivíricos não foi melhor que o placebo em dois estudos (NE 2). A combinação de corticoide e antivírico foi semelhante ao corticoide isolado em dois estudos e em quatro estudos foi reportado um benefício da combinação relativamente ao uso isolado de corticoide, sem significado estatístico. Este benefício da combinação de corticoide e antivírico foi potencialmente mais relevante em casos de paralisia severa (NE 2). Conclusões: A corticoterapia continua a ser o tratamento com a melhor evidência clínica (Recomendação A). Não existe evidência de benefício dos antivíricos, isoladamente ou em associação com corticoides, no tratamento da Paralisia de Bell (Recomendação B). Em doentes com paralisia severa poderá, potencialmente, existir um pequeno benefício na adição de antivíricos à terapêutica com corticoides (Recomendação B). São de realçar as diversas limitações metodológicas, assim como a heterogeneidade dos estudos.Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar2013-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v29i5.11164https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v29i5.11164Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 29 No. 5 (2013): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 308-314Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 29 Núm. 5 (2013): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 308-314Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 29 N.º 5 (2013): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 308-3142182-51812182-517310.32385/rpmgf.v29i5reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11164https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11164/10890Silva, Ana IsabelMagalhães, Tiagoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-17T11:59:41Zoai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/11164Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-09-17T11:59:41Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pharmacological treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis: What is the evidence? Tratamento farmacológico da Paralisia Facial Periférica Idiopática: qual a evidência? |
title |
Pharmacological treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis: What is the evidence? |
spellingShingle |
Pharmacological treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis: What is the evidence? Silva, Ana Isabel Idiopathic Peripheral Facial Palsy Bell’s Palsy Corticosteroids Antivirals Paralisia Facial Periférica Idiopática Paralisia de Bell Corticosteroides Antivíricos |
title_short |
Pharmacological treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis: What is the evidence? |
title_full |
Pharmacological treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis: What is the evidence? |
title_fullStr |
Pharmacological treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis: What is the evidence? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pharmacological treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis: What is the evidence? |
title_sort |
Pharmacological treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis: What is the evidence? |
author |
Silva, Ana Isabel |
author_facet |
Silva, Ana Isabel Magalhães, Tiago |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Magalhães, Tiago |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Ana Isabel Magalhães, Tiago |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Idiopathic Peripheral Facial Palsy Bell’s Palsy Corticosteroids Antivirals Paralisia Facial Periférica Idiopática Paralisia de Bell Corticosteroides Antivíricos |
topic |
Idiopathic Peripheral Facial Palsy Bell’s Palsy Corticosteroids Antivirals Paralisia Facial Periférica Idiopática Paralisia de Bell Corticosteroides Antivíricos |
description |
Objective: The objective of this study was to review the evidence for the most effective pharmacological treatment for idiopathic peripheral facial paralysis using corticosteroids and antiviral agents. Data sources: PubMed, evidence based medicine websites, Portuguese Medical Journal Index and references of selected articles were searched. Methodology: An electronic database search was conducted for clinical guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analysis (MA) and randomized controlled clinical trials, published between 01/2005 and 04/2012, in English and Portuguese, using the MeSH terms: Glucocorticoids; Antiviral Agents; Bell Palsy; Facial Paralysis. The Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) of the American Family Physician was used for the assessment of levels of evidence (LE) and the strength of recommendations. Results: Of the 181 articles found, seven MA were included. Three MA found significant clinical benefit from corticosteroid therapy compared to placebo treatment (LE 1). The use of antiviral drugs was no better than placebo in two studies (LE 2). The combination of corticosteroids and antiviral drugs was found to be similar to isolated corticosteroid therapy in two studies. In four studies, increased benefit from combination therapy was found compared to corticosteroid treatment alone, though this difference was not statistically significant. Benefit from the combination treatment was possibly more likely in cases of severe paralysis (LE 2). Conclusions: Evidence is strongest for the benefits of corticosteroids in the treatment of idiopathic facial nerve paralysis (Recommendation A). There is no evidence of benefit for antiviral drugs either alone or in combination with corticosteroids in the treatment of Bell’s palsy (Recommendation B). In patients with severe paralysis, there may be a small benefit in adding an antiviral drug to steroid therapy (Recommendation B). Numerous methodological limitations in the reported studies as well as the heterogeneity between studies were noted. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-09-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v29i5.11164 https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v29i5.11164 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v29i5.11164 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11164 https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11164/10890 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 29 No. 5 (2013): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 308-314 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 29 Núm. 5 (2013): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 308-314 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 29 N.º 5 (2013): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 308-314 2182-5181 2182-5173 10.32385/rpmgf.v29i5 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mluisa.alvim@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1817547194307182592 |