Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and High Doses in a Rural Portuguese Community Mental Health Service
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.51338/rppsm.2021.v7.i3.163 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) and high dose (APHD) remain a common practice in the treatment of severe mental illness, even though they are not supported by current international guidelines. Methods: We aimed to establish the prescribing patterns of antipsychotics in a community mental health service in a rural setting, to determine the prevalence of APP and APHD treatment and to identify associated factors. Results: We identified 284 patients. APP was present in 46.5% patients and was associated to younger age, single status, more previous psychiatric admissions, and anticholinergic prescription. Prescription of APHD was observed in 14.4% patients and was associated with previous inpatient admissions, being prescribed with a first generation long‑acting injectable antipsychotic and anticholinergics. We also found that APP and APHD were mutually associated. Conclusion: Despite current guidelines, we found prevalences of APP and APHD of 46.5% and 14.4%, respectively. Further studies are necessary to better evaluate the antipsychotic prescription patterns in Portugal. |
id |
RCAP_3d195648febeb85ae667c8ca943a9562 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.revistapsiquiatria.pt:article/163 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and High Doses in a Rural Portuguese Community Mental Health ServicePolifarmácia e Sobredosagem Antipsicótica num Serviço Comunitário do Interior de PortugalAntipsychotic AgentsCommunity Mental Health CentersInappropriate PrescribingPolypharmacyAntipsicóticosCentros Comunitários de Saúde MentalPrescrição InadequadaPolimedicaçãoIntroduction: Antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) and high dose (APHD) remain a common practice in the treatment of severe mental illness, even though they are not supported by current international guidelines. Methods: We aimed to establish the prescribing patterns of antipsychotics in a community mental health service in a rural setting, to determine the prevalence of APP and APHD treatment and to identify associated factors. Results: We identified 284 patients. APP was present in 46.5% patients and was associated to younger age, single status, more previous psychiatric admissions, and anticholinergic prescription. Prescription of APHD was observed in 14.4% patients and was associated with previous inpatient admissions, being prescribed with a first generation long‑acting injectable antipsychotic and anticholinergics. We also found that APP and APHD were mutually associated. Conclusion: Despite current guidelines, we found prevalences of APP and APHD of 46.5% and 14.4%, respectively. Further studies are necessary to better evaluate the antipsychotic prescription patterns in Portugal.Introdução: A polifarmácia e a sobredosagem antipsicóticas permanecem uma prática comum no tratamento de doenças mentais graves, embora as normas mais atuais não o recomendem. Métodos: Procurou‑se identificar os padrões de prescrição antipsicótica num serviço comunitário com enquadramento rural, de forma a determinar a prevalência de polifarmácia e sobredosagem antipsicótica e fatores associados. Resultados: Foram identificados 284 doentes. A polifármacia antipsicótica foi observada em 46,5% dos doentes e associava‑se a idades mais jovens, ser solteiro, internamentos psiquiátricos prévios e prescrição de anticolinérgicos. Por outro lado, a sobredosagem antipsicótica foi encontrada em 14,4% dos doentes e associava‑se a internamentos psiquiátricos prévios, estar medicado com um antipsicótico injetável de primeira geração de longa duração de ação e com um anticolinérgico. Observou‑se também que a sobredosagem e a polifármacia estavam associadas. Conclusão: Apesar das recomendações internacionais, identificaram‑se prevalências de polifarmácia e sobredosagem antipsicótica de 46,5% e 14,4%, respetivamente. São necessários mais estudos para melhor caracterizar os padrões de prescrição antipsicótica em Portugal.Sociedade Portuguesa de Psiquiatria e Saúde Mental2021-09-08T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.51338/rppsm.2021.v7.i3.163oai:ojs.www.revistapsiquiatria.pt:article/163Revista Portuguesa de Psiquiatria e Saúde Mental; Vol. 7 No. 3 (2021); 109-116Revista Portuguesa de Psiquiatria e Saúde Mental; Vol. 7 N.º 3 (2021); 109-1162184-54172184-5522reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.revistapsiquiatria.pt/index.php/sppsm/article/view/163https://doi.org/10.51338/rppsm.2021.v7.i3.163https://www.revistapsiquiatria.pt/index.php/sppsm/article/view/163/92Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Revista Portuguesa de Psiquiatria e Saúde Mentalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRamos, SaraCruz, DianaJesus, BiancaCorreia, JoãoVaz, IsabelMendes, João2022-09-06T09:37:40Zoai:ojs.www.revistapsiquiatria.pt:article/163Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:37:12.662481Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and High Doses in a Rural Portuguese Community Mental Health Service Polifarmácia e Sobredosagem Antipsicótica num Serviço Comunitário do Interior de Portugal |
title |
Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and High Doses in a Rural Portuguese Community Mental Health Service |
spellingShingle |
Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and High Doses in a Rural Portuguese Community Mental Health Service Ramos, Sara Antipsychotic Agents Community Mental Health Centers Inappropriate Prescribing Polypharmacy Antipsicóticos Centros Comunitários de Saúde Mental Prescrição Inadequada Polimedicação |
title_short |
Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and High Doses in a Rural Portuguese Community Mental Health Service |
title_full |
Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and High Doses in a Rural Portuguese Community Mental Health Service |
title_fullStr |
Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and High Doses in a Rural Portuguese Community Mental Health Service |
title_full_unstemmed |
Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and High Doses in a Rural Portuguese Community Mental Health Service |
title_sort |
Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and High Doses in a Rural Portuguese Community Mental Health Service |
author |
Ramos, Sara |
author_facet |
Ramos, Sara Cruz, Diana Jesus, Bianca Correia, João Vaz, Isabel Mendes, João |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cruz, Diana Jesus, Bianca Correia, João Vaz, Isabel Mendes, João |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ramos, Sara Cruz, Diana Jesus, Bianca Correia, João Vaz, Isabel Mendes, João |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Antipsychotic Agents Community Mental Health Centers Inappropriate Prescribing Polypharmacy Antipsicóticos Centros Comunitários de Saúde Mental Prescrição Inadequada Polimedicação |
topic |
Antipsychotic Agents Community Mental Health Centers Inappropriate Prescribing Polypharmacy Antipsicóticos Centros Comunitários de Saúde Mental Prescrição Inadequada Polimedicação |
description |
Introduction: Antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) and high dose (APHD) remain a common practice in the treatment of severe mental illness, even though they are not supported by current international guidelines. Methods: We aimed to establish the prescribing patterns of antipsychotics in a community mental health service in a rural setting, to determine the prevalence of APP and APHD treatment and to identify associated factors. Results: We identified 284 patients. APP was present in 46.5% patients and was associated to younger age, single status, more previous psychiatric admissions, and anticholinergic prescription. Prescription of APHD was observed in 14.4% patients and was associated with previous inpatient admissions, being prescribed with a first generation long‑acting injectable antipsychotic and anticholinergics. We also found that APP and APHD were mutually associated. Conclusion: Despite current guidelines, we found prevalences of APP and APHD of 46.5% and 14.4%, respectively. Further studies are necessary to better evaluate the antipsychotic prescription patterns in Portugal. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-08T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.51338/rppsm.2021.v7.i3.163 oai:ojs.www.revistapsiquiatria.pt:article/163 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.51338/rppsm.2021.v7.i3.163 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.www.revistapsiquiatria.pt:article/163 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistapsiquiatria.pt/index.php/sppsm/article/view/163 https://doi.org/10.51338/rppsm.2021.v7.i3.163 https://www.revistapsiquiatria.pt/index.php/sppsm/article/view/163/92 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Revista Portuguesa de Psiquiatria e Saúde Mental info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Revista Portuguesa de Psiquiatria e Saúde Mental |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Psiquiatria e Saúde Mental |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Psiquiatria e Saúde Mental |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Portuguesa de Psiquiatria e Saúde Mental; Vol. 7 No. 3 (2021); 109-116 Revista Portuguesa de Psiquiatria e Saúde Mental; Vol. 7 N.º 3 (2021); 109-116 2184-5417 2184-5522 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130237797138432 |