How credit rating agencies influence the stock markets: Event study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Branco, João Belo
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/6389
Resumo: This study attempts to find whether rating agencies still have an impact on the stock market after the subprime crisis of 2008. I examine the abnormal returns surrounding the rating changes and outlooks, on the firms present in Standard & Poor’s 500 stock Index. The analysis goes partially along with previous literature. Initial rating opinions (outlooks) have much more impact than credit ratings, being clear a dominance of downside information significance over the upside one. Also in line with previous findings, Moody’s is the rating agency with the biggest impact on the American stock market, followed by Standard and Poor’s, leaving Fitch almost irrelevant. In addition, this study points out that rating agencies do not have such big impact on markets like before the 2008 crises, nonetheless they still influence a part of investors when taking their investment decisions otherwise no reaction would be noticed in the stocks’ abnormal returns. I analyze as well if it is possible to have continuous gains when investing upon credit rating announcements in the medium term and conclude that upon diversification an investing strategy can be used when one successfully predicts the rating change. However for outlooks our analysis is not conclusive.
id RCAP_3d4ddad560bdd6cf569450d1f7e7efaa
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/6389
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling How credit rating agencies influence the stock markets: Event studyCredit ratingsEvent studiesAbnormal returnsEfficient market theoryClassificação de risco de créditoEstudo de eventosRetornos anormaisTeoria da eficiência de mercadoThis study attempts to find whether rating agencies still have an impact on the stock market after the subprime crisis of 2008. I examine the abnormal returns surrounding the rating changes and outlooks, on the firms present in Standard & Poor’s 500 stock Index. The analysis goes partially along with previous literature. Initial rating opinions (outlooks) have much more impact than credit ratings, being clear a dominance of downside information significance over the upside one. Also in line with previous findings, Moody’s is the rating agency with the biggest impact on the American stock market, followed by Standard and Poor’s, leaving Fitch almost irrelevant. In addition, this study points out that rating agencies do not have such big impact on markets like before the 2008 crises, nonetheless they still influence a part of investors when taking their investment decisions otherwise no reaction would be noticed in the stocks’ abnormal returns. I analyze as well if it is possible to have continuous gains when investing upon credit rating announcements in the medium term and conclude that upon diversification an investing strategy can be used when one successfully predicts the rating change. However for outlooks our analysis is not conclusive.Este estudo tem como objectivo concluir se as agências de rating de crédito ainda têm um impacto significativo sobre o mercado de acções depois da crise do subprime de 2008. Para tal, observo os retornos anormais próximo da data em que se deram as mudanças de ratings e de outlooks nas empresas pertencentes ao Índice de acções Standard and Poor’s 500. A minha análise vai em parte de encontro aos estudos anteriores. As primeiras opiniões publicadas pelas agências de rating (outlooks) têm muito mais impacto nas acções que os ratings por si só. Sendo que existe uma clara permanência e acentuação das opiniões negativas em relação às positivas. Também de acordo com artigos publicados anteriormente, a agência Moody’s é a agência com mais impacto sobre o mercado de acções Americano, seguida pela Standard and Poor’s, sendo a Fitch quase irrelevante. É possível concluir também que estas agências, hoje em dia não têm um impacto tão significativo no Mercado como antes da crise de 2008, contudo ainda influenciam uma parte dos investidores quando estes tomam as suas decisões de investimento. Caso contrário não existiria impacto nos retornos anormais. Analiso, por último também a possibilidade de poderem ser gerados ganhos contínuos ao longo do tempo quando adoptando uma estratégia de investimento que segue os ratings de crédito num médio prazo. Concluindo que com suficiente diversificação e uma antecipação da mudança de rating é possível obter ganhos contínuos durante um certo espaço de tempo. No entanto sobre os outlooks, a análise não é conclusiva.2014-02-04T17:11:30Z2012-01-01T00:00:00Z20122012-10info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfapplication/octet-streamhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/6389engBranco, João Beloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:59:41Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/6389Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:31:22.446067Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How credit rating agencies influence the stock markets: Event study
title How credit rating agencies influence the stock markets: Event study
spellingShingle How credit rating agencies influence the stock markets: Event study
Branco, João Belo
Credit ratings
Event studies
Abnormal returns
Efficient market theory
Classificação de risco de crédito
Estudo de eventos
Retornos anormais
Teoria da eficiência de mercado
title_short How credit rating agencies influence the stock markets: Event study
title_full How credit rating agencies influence the stock markets: Event study
title_fullStr How credit rating agencies influence the stock markets: Event study
title_full_unstemmed How credit rating agencies influence the stock markets: Event study
title_sort How credit rating agencies influence the stock markets: Event study
author Branco, João Belo
author_facet Branco, João Belo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Branco, João Belo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Credit ratings
Event studies
Abnormal returns
Efficient market theory
Classificação de risco de crédito
Estudo de eventos
Retornos anormais
Teoria da eficiência de mercado
topic Credit ratings
Event studies
Abnormal returns
Efficient market theory
Classificação de risco de crédito
Estudo de eventos
Retornos anormais
Teoria da eficiência de mercado
description This study attempts to find whether rating agencies still have an impact on the stock market after the subprime crisis of 2008. I examine the abnormal returns surrounding the rating changes and outlooks, on the firms present in Standard & Poor’s 500 stock Index. The analysis goes partially along with previous literature. Initial rating opinions (outlooks) have much more impact than credit ratings, being clear a dominance of downside information significance over the upside one. Also in line with previous findings, Moody’s is the rating agency with the biggest impact on the American stock market, followed by Standard and Poor’s, leaving Fitch almost irrelevant. In addition, this study points out that rating agencies do not have such big impact on markets like before the 2008 crises, nonetheless they still influence a part of investors when taking their investment decisions otherwise no reaction would be noticed in the stocks’ abnormal returns. I analyze as well if it is possible to have continuous gains when investing upon credit rating announcements in the medium term and conclude that upon diversification an investing strategy can be used when one successfully predicts the rating change. However for outlooks our analysis is not conclusive.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
2012
2012-10
2014-02-04T17:11:30Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/6389
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/6389
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/octet-stream
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134875525054464