The Great Discrepancy: Political Action, Sustainable Development and Ecological Communication

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Konold, Dieter
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Schwietring, Thomas
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3631
Resumo: The term ‘sustainable development’ was coined to denote a political goal some 40 years ago; debates about sustainability date back considerably further. These debates reflect the growing awareness of the destructive effects of human activities on the natural foundations of life. Numerous initiatives have been launched to trigger a turnaround, with the 2030 Agenda and the SDGs being the latest attempt. However, substantial progress has been rather limited thus far. This discrepancy is the subject of the article. Starting from a historical overview of sustainability politics, the argument develops in three steps. First, it is shown that conventional conceptions to promote environmental change fall short in depicting the broader societal context. To provide a comprehensive picture of the challenges related to transformation processes, a theory of the functional differentiation of societies is presented in a second step. A systems theory perspective offers a convincing theoretical explication of the problem. Third, this approach is scrutinized with regard to the political system and the politics of sustainability. The key finding is that the specific functional logics of the different social subsystems must be taken into account when analysing sustainable development and the discrepancy between the aims and ambitions of (global) environmental policy and the visible consequences. On the one hand, the functional differentiation of modern society guarantees its high degree of effectiveness and flexibility. On the other hand, implementing fundamental change, such as a transition towards sustainability, is not simply a question of strategy or of political willingness and steering. Rather, there is a need for more elaborate explanatory instruments. As a result, we argue for a linking of theories of sustainable development and advanced social theory.
id RCAP_3db14e6d86fa454702e9629ae1ea98c6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3631
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The Great Discrepancy: Political Action, Sustainable Development and Ecological Communicationenvironmental policy; functional differentiation; global governance; Niklas Luhmann; sustainability politics; Sustainable Development Goals; systems theoryThe term ‘sustainable development’ was coined to denote a political goal some 40 years ago; debates about sustainability date back considerably further. These debates reflect the growing awareness of the destructive effects of human activities on the natural foundations of life. Numerous initiatives have been launched to trigger a turnaround, with the 2030 Agenda and the SDGs being the latest attempt. However, substantial progress has been rather limited thus far. This discrepancy is the subject of the article. Starting from a historical overview of sustainability politics, the argument develops in three steps. First, it is shown that conventional conceptions to promote environmental change fall short in depicting the broader societal context. To provide a comprehensive picture of the challenges related to transformation processes, a theory of the functional differentiation of societies is presented in a second step. A systems theory perspective offers a convincing theoretical explication of the problem. Third, this approach is scrutinized with regard to the political system and the politics of sustainability. The key finding is that the specific functional logics of the different social subsystems must be taken into account when analysing sustainable development and the discrepancy between the aims and ambitions of (global) environmental policy and the visible consequences. On the one hand, the functional differentiation of modern society guarantees its high degree of effectiveness and flexibility. On the other hand, implementing fundamental change, such as a transition towards sustainability, is not simply a question of strategy or of political willingness and steering. Rather, there is a need for more elaborate explanatory instruments. As a result, we argue for a linking of theories of sustainable development and advanced social theory.Cogitatio2021-02-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3631oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3631Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 1 (2021): The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Transformative Change through Sustainable Development Goals?; 131-1402183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3631https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3631https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3631/3631Copyright (c) 2021 Dieter Konold, Thomas Schwietringhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKonold, DieterSchwietring, Thomas2022-12-22T15:16:52Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3631Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:31.753492Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Great Discrepancy: Political Action, Sustainable Development and Ecological Communication
title The Great Discrepancy: Political Action, Sustainable Development and Ecological Communication
spellingShingle The Great Discrepancy: Political Action, Sustainable Development and Ecological Communication
Konold, Dieter
environmental policy; functional differentiation; global governance; Niklas Luhmann; sustainability politics; Sustainable Development Goals; systems theory
title_short The Great Discrepancy: Political Action, Sustainable Development and Ecological Communication
title_full The Great Discrepancy: Political Action, Sustainable Development and Ecological Communication
title_fullStr The Great Discrepancy: Political Action, Sustainable Development and Ecological Communication
title_full_unstemmed The Great Discrepancy: Political Action, Sustainable Development and Ecological Communication
title_sort The Great Discrepancy: Political Action, Sustainable Development and Ecological Communication
author Konold, Dieter
author_facet Konold, Dieter
Schwietring, Thomas
author_role author
author2 Schwietring, Thomas
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Konold, Dieter
Schwietring, Thomas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv environmental policy; functional differentiation; global governance; Niklas Luhmann; sustainability politics; Sustainable Development Goals; systems theory
topic environmental policy; functional differentiation; global governance; Niklas Luhmann; sustainability politics; Sustainable Development Goals; systems theory
description The term ‘sustainable development’ was coined to denote a political goal some 40 years ago; debates about sustainability date back considerably further. These debates reflect the growing awareness of the destructive effects of human activities on the natural foundations of life. Numerous initiatives have been launched to trigger a turnaround, with the 2030 Agenda and the SDGs being the latest attempt. However, substantial progress has been rather limited thus far. This discrepancy is the subject of the article. Starting from a historical overview of sustainability politics, the argument develops in three steps. First, it is shown that conventional conceptions to promote environmental change fall short in depicting the broader societal context. To provide a comprehensive picture of the challenges related to transformation processes, a theory of the functional differentiation of societies is presented in a second step. A systems theory perspective offers a convincing theoretical explication of the problem. Third, this approach is scrutinized with regard to the political system and the politics of sustainability. The key finding is that the specific functional logics of the different social subsystems must be taken into account when analysing sustainable development and the discrepancy between the aims and ambitions of (global) environmental policy and the visible consequences. On the one hand, the functional differentiation of modern society guarantees its high degree of effectiveness and flexibility. On the other hand, implementing fundamental change, such as a transition towards sustainability, is not simply a question of strategy or of political willingness and steering. Rather, there is a need for more elaborate explanatory instruments. As a result, we argue for a linking of theories of sustainable development and advanced social theory.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-26
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3631
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3631
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3631
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3631
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3631
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3631
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3631/3631
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Dieter Konold, Thomas Schwietring
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Dieter Konold, Thomas Schwietring
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 1 (2021): The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Transformative Change through Sustainable Development Goals?; 131-140
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130671088664576