Sustainability of treatment technologies for industrial biowastes effluents

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kamali, Mohammadreza
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Costa, Maria Elisabete, Aminabhavi, Tejraj M., Capela, Isabel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/37522
Resumo: Despite the huge efforts to develop efficient technologies for the treatment of recalcitrant biowastes and other emerging pollutants, selecting the most sustainable method among the possible alternatives is still a formidable task. This is mainly because of the integration of technical, economic, environmental, and social criteria in decision-making process. Traditionally, various multi-criteria decision-making approaches have been adopted to integrate innumerable criteria for environmental applications. In this study, we have examined the fuzzy-Delphi approach to evaluate seventeen parameters for integrating technical, economic, environmental and social criteria in order to rank the nine treatment technologies divided in two categories (physico-chemical and biological processes). The results of this study indicated that although efficiency of treatment methods is the most important criterion, but contribution of other sustainability criteria should also be considered because they are of high importance for the selection of sustainable wastewater treatment methods. As per our proposed framework on membrane technologies (among the many other physico-chemical methods) and anaerobic sludge blanket technology (among the biological treatment methods) are the most promising approaches for the treatment of highly polluted emerging industrial pollutants. The findings of this study are fully supported by the consensus achieved by a group of fifty experts from nineteen different countries. Opportunities for the improvement of the methods as per data generated are discussed.
id RCAP_3eed37f25f5c6997b7ee882c4bedbc5e
oai_identifier_str oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/37522
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Sustainability of treatment technologies for industrial biowastes effluentsSustainabilityFuzzy-Delphi methodologyBiowastesPhysico-chemical methodsMembrane technologiesBiological methodsDespite the huge efforts to develop efficient technologies for the treatment of recalcitrant biowastes and other emerging pollutants, selecting the most sustainable method among the possible alternatives is still a formidable task. This is mainly because of the integration of technical, economic, environmental, and social criteria in decision-making process. Traditionally, various multi-criteria decision-making approaches have been adopted to integrate innumerable criteria for environmental applications. In this study, we have examined the fuzzy-Delphi approach to evaluate seventeen parameters for integrating technical, economic, environmental and social criteria in order to rank the nine treatment technologies divided in two categories (physico-chemical and biological processes). The results of this study indicated that although efficiency of treatment methods is the most important criterion, but contribution of other sustainability criteria should also be considered because they are of high importance for the selection of sustainable wastewater treatment methods. As per our proposed framework on membrane technologies (among the many other physico-chemical methods) and anaerobic sludge blanket technology (among the biological treatment methods) are the most promising approaches for the treatment of highly polluted emerging industrial pollutants. The findings of this study are fully supported by the consensus achieved by a group of fifty experts from nineteen different countries. Opportunities for the improvement of the methods as per data generated are discussed.Elsevier2023-05-05T09:27:32Z2019-08-15T00:00:00Z2019-08-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/37522eng1385-894710.1016/j.cej.2019.04.010Kamali, MohammadrezaCosta, Maria ElisabeteAminabhavi, Tejraj M.Capela, Isabelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-22T12:12:32Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/37522Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:08:08.812886Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sustainability of treatment technologies for industrial biowastes effluents
title Sustainability of treatment technologies for industrial biowastes effluents
spellingShingle Sustainability of treatment technologies for industrial biowastes effluents
Kamali, Mohammadreza
Sustainability
Fuzzy-Delphi methodology
Biowastes
Physico-chemical methods
Membrane technologies
Biological methods
title_short Sustainability of treatment technologies for industrial biowastes effluents
title_full Sustainability of treatment technologies for industrial biowastes effluents
title_fullStr Sustainability of treatment technologies for industrial biowastes effluents
title_full_unstemmed Sustainability of treatment technologies for industrial biowastes effluents
title_sort Sustainability of treatment technologies for industrial biowastes effluents
author Kamali, Mohammadreza
author_facet Kamali, Mohammadreza
Costa, Maria Elisabete
Aminabhavi, Tejraj M.
Capela, Isabel
author_role author
author2 Costa, Maria Elisabete
Aminabhavi, Tejraj M.
Capela, Isabel
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kamali, Mohammadreza
Costa, Maria Elisabete
Aminabhavi, Tejraj M.
Capela, Isabel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sustainability
Fuzzy-Delphi methodology
Biowastes
Physico-chemical methods
Membrane technologies
Biological methods
topic Sustainability
Fuzzy-Delphi methodology
Biowastes
Physico-chemical methods
Membrane technologies
Biological methods
description Despite the huge efforts to develop efficient technologies for the treatment of recalcitrant biowastes and other emerging pollutants, selecting the most sustainable method among the possible alternatives is still a formidable task. This is mainly because of the integration of technical, economic, environmental, and social criteria in decision-making process. Traditionally, various multi-criteria decision-making approaches have been adopted to integrate innumerable criteria for environmental applications. In this study, we have examined the fuzzy-Delphi approach to evaluate seventeen parameters for integrating technical, economic, environmental and social criteria in order to rank the nine treatment technologies divided in two categories (physico-chemical and biological processes). The results of this study indicated that although efficiency of treatment methods is the most important criterion, but contribution of other sustainability criteria should also be considered because they are of high importance for the selection of sustainable wastewater treatment methods. As per our proposed framework on membrane technologies (among the many other physico-chemical methods) and anaerobic sludge blanket technology (among the biological treatment methods) are the most promising approaches for the treatment of highly polluted emerging industrial pollutants. The findings of this study are fully supported by the consensus achieved by a group of fifty experts from nineteen different countries. Opportunities for the improvement of the methods as per data generated are discussed.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-15T00:00:00Z
2019-08-15
2023-05-05T09:27:32Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10773/37522
url http://hdl.handle.net/10773/37522
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1385-8947
10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.010
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137735093518336