Phantasia and historiographic epistemology: a critical Reading of Ricoeur’s triple mimesis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Duarte Bernardes, Joana
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.48487/pdh.2017.n4.22980
Resumo: The narrativity to which the historiographical narrative is subjected finds in memory its hypothesis of identification and identity, which elevates the problem of narrative quality into a level in which the distribution of categorical narratives is, in itself, not sufficient for the emergence of discontinuity. What is at stake is the impossibility of transforming the object – which would undermine the nature of historiography and would take out the epistemological status that it can hold. To admit narrativity as an irruption of what is discontinuous leads to a need to reread permanence. Permanence is an inchoative form of permanere, which means nothing less than “remain until the end”. Therefore, what is the importance of the system of triple mimesis proposed by Paul Ricoeur? What pertinence can it have in the field of historiographical narrative? In other words, is it possible or viable to think about Ricoeur’s paradigm in theory of history and historiography?
id RCAP_3f5db800fdca87bcdf9bf00175ae7bc9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/22980
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Phantasia and historiographic epistemology: a critical Reading of Ricoeur’s triple mimesisPhantasia e epistemologia historiográfica: para uma leitura crítica da tripla mimese de Paul RicoeurNarrativaTripla MimesePaul RicoeurNarrativeTriple MimesisPaul RicoeurThe narrativity to which the historiographical narrative is subjected finds in memory its hypothesis of identification and identity, which elevates the problem of narrative quality into a level in which the distribution of categorical narratives is, in itself, not sufficient for the emergence of discontinuity. What is at stake is the impossibility of transforming the object – which would undermine the nature of historiography and would take out the epistemological status that it can hold. To admit narrativity as an irruption of what is discontinuous leads to a need to reread permanence. Permanence is an inchoative form of permanere, which means nothing less than “remain until the end”. Therefore, what is the importance of the system of triple mimesis proposed by Paul Ricoeur? What pertinence can it have in the field of historiographical narrative? In other words, is it possible or viable to think about Ricoeur’s paradigm in theory of history and historiography?A narratividade a que a narrativa historiográfica está sujeita tem na memória a hipótese de identificação e de identidade, o que eleva o patamar do que é narrativo enquanto qualidade para um plano em que não basta a distribuição de categorias narrativas para que a descontinuidade surja. O que está em causa é a impossibilidade de transformar o objecto – o que comprometeria a natureza da historiografia e lhe retiraria o estatuto epistemológico que pode deter. Admitir a narratividade como irrupção do que é descontínuo leva a que a permanência deva ser relida. É que permanecer é a forma incoactiva de permanere, que significa nada menos do que “ficar até ao fim”. Nesse sentido, qual a importância de que se reveste o sistema da tríplice mimese preconizado por Paul Ricoeur? Que pertinência pode ter no campo da narrativa historiográfica? Ou, perguntando de outra forma, é possível ou viável pensar o paradigma de Ricoeur no tocante à teoria da História e à historiografia?Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa2021-01-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.48487/pdh.2017.n4.22980https://doi.org/10.48487/pdh.2017.n4.22980Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Past; No. 4 (2017); 37-73Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Past; N.º 4 (2017); 37-732183-590Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://praticasdahistoria.pt/article/view/22980https://praticasdahistoria.pt/article/view/22980/17046Copyright (c) 2021 Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Pastinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDuarte Bernardes, Joana2023-04-15T05:23:43Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/22980Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:49:22.032200Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Phantasia and historiographic epistemology: a critical Reading of Ricoeur’s triple mimesis
Phantasia e epistemologia historiográfica: para uma leitura crítica da tripla mimese de Paul Ricoeur
title Phantasia and historiographic epistemology: a critical Reading of Ricoeur’s triple mimesis
spellingShingle Phantasia and historiographic epistemology: a critical Reading of Ricoeur’s triple mimesis
Duarte Bernardes, Joana
Narrativa
Tripla Mimese
Paul Ricoeur
Narrative
Triple Mimesis
Paul Ricoeur
title_short Phantasia and historiographic epistemology: a critical Reading of Ricoeur’s triple mimesis
title_full Phantasia and historiographic epistemology: a critical Reading of Ricoeur’s triple mimesis
title_fullStr Phantasia and historiographic epistemology: a critical Reading of Ricoeur’s triple mimesis
title_full_unstemmed Phantasia and historiographic epistemology: a critical Reading of Ricoeur’s triple mimesis
title_sort Phantasia and historiographic epistemology: a critical Reading of Ricoeur’s triple mimesis
author Duarte Bernardes, Joana
author_facet Duarte Bernardes, Joana
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Duarte Bernardes, Joana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Narrativa
Tripla Mimese
Paul Ricoeur
Narrative
Triple Mimesis
Paul Ricoeur
topic Narrativa
Tripla Mimese
Paul Ricoeur
Narrative
Triple Mimesis
Paul Ricoeur
description The narrativity to which the historiographical narrative is subjected finds in memory its hypothesis of identification and identity, which elevates the problem of narrative quality into a level in which the distribution of categorical narratives is, in itself, not sufficient for the emergence of discontinuity. What is at stake is the impossibility of transforming the object – which would undermine the nature of historiography and would take out the epistemological status that it can hold. To admit narrativity as an irruption of what is discontinuous leads to a need to reread permanence. Permanence is an inchoative form of permanere, which means nothing less than “remain until the end”. Therefore, what is the importance of the system of triple mimesis proposed by Paul Ricoeur? What pertinence can it have in the field of historiographical narrative? In other words, is it possible or viable to think about Ricoeur’s paradigm in theory of history and historiography?
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-26
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.48487/pdh.2017.n4.22980
https://doi.org/10.48487/pdh.2017.n4.22980
url https://doi.org/10.48487/pdh.2017.n4.22980
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://praticasdahistoria.pt/article/view/22980
https://praticasdahistoria.pt/article/view/22980/17046
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Past
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Past
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Past; No. 4 (2017); 37-73
Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Past; N.º 4 (2017); 37-73
2183-590X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131574577397760

Registros relacionados