Green Infrastructure and Biophilic Urbanism as Tools for Integrating Resource Efficient and Ecological Cities

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Thomson, Giles
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Newman, Peter
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i1.3633
Resumo: In recent decades, the concept of resource efficient cities has emerged as an urban planning paradigm that seeks to achieve sustainable urban environments. This focus is upon compact urban environments that optimise energy, water and waste systems to create cities that help solve climate change and other resource-based sustainability issues. In parallel, there has been a long-standing tradition of ecological approaches to the design of cities that can be traced from Howard, Geddes, McHarg and Lyle. Rather than resource efficiency, the ecological approach has focused upon the retention and repair of natural landscape features and the creation of green infrastructure (GI) to manage urban water, soil and plants in a more ecologically sensitive way. There is some conflict with the resource efficient cities and ecological cities paradigms, as one is pro-density, while the other is anti-density. This article focusses upon how to integrate the two paradigms through new biophilic urbanism (BU) tools that allow the integration of nature into dense urban areas, to supplement more traditional GI tools in less dense areas. We suggest that the theory of urban fabrics can aid with regard to which tools to use where, for the integration of GI and BU into different parts of the city to achieve both resource efficient and ecological outcomes, that optimise energy water and waste systems, and increase urban nature.
id RCAP_3f9ca1b25104c6b89f4e1ccabe509b14
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3633
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Green Infrastructure and Biophilic Urbanism as Tools for Integrating Resource Efficient and Ecological Citiesbiophilic urbanism; ecological cities; green infrastructure; resource efficient cities; urban fabric theory; urban planningIn recent decades, the concept of resource efficient cities has emerged as an urban planning paradigm that seeks to achieve sustainable urban environments. This focus is upon compact urban environments that optimise energy, water and waste systems to create cities that help solve climate change and other resource-based sustainability issues. In parallel, there has been a long-standing tradition of ecological approaches to the design of cities that can be traced from Howard, Geddes, McHarg and Lyle. Rather than resource efficiency, the ecological approach has focused upon the retention and repair of natural landscape features and the creation of green infrastructure (GI) to manage urban water, soil and plants in a more ecologically sensitive way. There is some conflict with the resource efficient cities and ecological cities paradigms, as one is pro-density, while the other is anti-density. This article focusses upon how to integrate the two paradigms through new biophilic urbanism (BU) tools that allow the integration of nature into dense urban areas, to supplement more traditional GI tools in less dense areas. We suggest that the theory of urban fabrics can aid with regard to which tools to use where, for the integration of GI and BU into different parts of the city to achieve both resource efficient and ecological outcomes, that optimise energy water and waste systems, and increase urban nature.Cogitatio2021-01-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i1.3633oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3633Urban Planning; Vol 6, No 1 (2021): Urban Planning and Green Infrastructure; 75-882183-7635reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/3633https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i1.3633https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/3633/3633Copyright (c) 2021 Giles Thomson, Peter Newmanhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessThomson, GilesNewman, Peter2022-12-20T11:00:12Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3633Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:06.913588Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Green Infrastructure and Biophilic Urbanism as Tools for Integrating Resource Efficient and Ecological Cities
title Green Infrastructure and Biophilic Urbanism as Tools for Integrating Resource Efficient and Ecological Cities
spellingShingle Green Infrastructure and Biophilic Urbanism as Tools for Integrating Resource Efficient and Ecological Cities
Thomson, Giles
biophilic urbanism; ecological cities; green infrastructure; resource efficient cities; urban fabric theory; urban planning
title_short Green Infrastructure and Biophilic Urbanism as Tools for Integrating Resource Efficient and Ecological Cities
title_full Green Infrastructure and Biophilic Urbanism as Tools for Integrating Resource Efficient and Ecological Cities
title_fullStr Green Infrastructure and Biophilic Urbanism as Tools for Integrating Resource Efficient and Ecological Cities
title_full_unstemmed Green Infrastructure and Biophilic Urbanism as Tools for Integrating Resource Efficient and Ecological Cities
title_sort Green Infrastructure and Biophilic Urbanism as Tools for Integrating Resource Efficient and Ecological Cities
author Thomson, Giles
author_facet Thomson, Giles
Newman, Peter
author_role author
author2 Newman, Peter
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Thomson, Giles
Newman, Peter
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv biophilic urbanism; ecological cities; green infrastructure; resource efficient cities; urban fabric theory; urban planning
topic biophilic urbanism; ecological cities; green infrastructure; resource efficient cities; urban fabric theory; urban planning
description In recent decades, the concept of resource efficient cities has emerged as an urban planning paradigm that seeks to achieve sustainable urban environments. This focus is upon compact urban environments that optimise energy, water and waste systems to create cities that help solve climate change and other resource-based sustainability issues. In parallel, there has been a long-standing tradition of ecological approaches to the design of cities that can be traced from Howard, Geddes, McHarg and Lyle. Rather than resource efficiency, the ecological approach has focused upon the retention and repair of natural landscape features and the creation of green infrastructure (GI) to manage urban water, soil and plants in a more ecologically sensitive way. There is some conflict with the resource efficient cities and ecological cities paradigms, as one is pro-density, while the other is anti-density. This article focusses upon how to integrate the two paradigms through new biophilic urbanism (BU) tools that allow the integration of nature into dense urban areas, to supplement more traditional GI tools in less dense areas. We suggest that the theory of urban fabrics can aid with regard to which tools to use where, for the integration of GI and BU into different parts of the city to achieve both resource efficient and ecological outcomes, that optimise energy water and waste systems, and increase urban nature.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-26
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i1.3633
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3633
url https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i1.3633
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3633
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/3633
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i1.3633
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/3633/3633
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Giles Thomson, Peter Newman
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Giles Thomson, Peter Newman
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Urban Planning; Vol 6, No 1 (2021): Urban Planning and Green Infrastructure; 75-88
2183-7635
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130667295965184