Prognostic factors for recovery and non-recovery in patients with non-specific neck pain: a protocol for a systematic literature review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/2268 |
Resumo: | INTRODUCTION: Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder worldwide. It can result in significant disability and impaired quality of life. More than 50% of patients with neck pain still report symptoms 1 year later despite receiving different forms of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment. Identifying patient characteristics that are modifiable or predict recovery and non-recovery for an individual patient might identify ways of improving outcomes. This systematic review aims to comprehensively summarise the existing evidence regarding baseline patient characteristics associated with recovery and non-recovery, as defined by measures of pain intensity, disability and global perceived improvement. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Six electronic databases, PubMed, CINAHL, PEDro Database, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science, will be searched, with terms related to the review question such as neck pain, prognostic or predictive research, from inception to 28 September of 2018. Studies will be included if they have investigated an association between patient characteristics and outcomes, with at least one follow-up time point. Two independent reviewers will screen the titles and abstracts followed by a full-text review to assess papers regarding their eligibility. Data from included papers will be extracted using standardised forms, including study and participants' characteristics, outcomes, prognostic factors and effect size of the association. The risk of bias of each study will be assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. A narrative synthesis will be conducted considering the strength, consistency of results and the methodological quality. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review does not require ethical approval. The results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-review journal, as a chapter of a doctoral thesis and through presentations at national and international conferences. |
id |
RCAP_3fa17d32e4ac8920c6ab32d11034f8dd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt:10400.4/2268 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Prognostic factors for recovery and non-recovery in patients with non-specific neck pain: a protocol for a systematic literature reviewCervicalgiaFalha de TratamentoResultado do TratamentoRevisão SistemáticaPrognósticoINTRODUCTION: Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder worldwide. It can result in significant disability and impaired quality of life. More than 50% of patients with neck pain still report symptoms 1 year later despite receiving different forms of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment. Identifying patient characteristics that are modifiable or predict recovery and non-recovery for an individual patient might identify ways of improving outcomes. This systematic review aims to comprehensively summarise the existing evidence regarding baseline patient characteristics associated with recovery and non-recovery, as defined by measures of pain intensity, disability and global perceived improvement. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Six electronic databases, PubMed, CINAHL, PEDro Database, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science, will be searched, with terms related to the review question such as neck pain, prognostic or predictive research, from inception to 28 September of 2018. Studies will be included if they have investigated an association between patient characteristics and outcomes, with at least one follow-up time point. Two independent reviewers will screen the titles and abstracts followed by a full-text review to assess papers regarding their eligibility. Data from included papers will be extracted using standardised forms, including study and participants' characteristics, outcomes, prognostic factors and effect size of the association. The risk of bias of each study will be assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. A narrative synthesis will be conducted considering the strength, consistency of results and the methodological quality. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review does not require ethical approval. The results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-review journal, as a chapter of a doctoral thesis and through presentations at national and international conferences.RIHUCDomingues, LCruz, EBPimentel-Santos, FMRamiro, SDonato, HManica, SRHayden, JABuchbinder, RBranco, JC2019-12-09T10:03:02Z20182018-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/2268engBMJ Open. 2018 Nov 25;8(11):e023356.10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023356info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-11T14:23:39Zoai:rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt:10400.4/2268Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:04:44.316693Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Prognostic factors for recovery and non-recovery in patients with non-specific neck pain: a protocol for a systematic literature review |
title |
Prognostic factors for recovery and non-recovery in patients with non-specific neck pain: a protocol for a systematic literature review |
spellingShingle |
Prognostic factors for recovery and non-recovery in patients with non-specific neck pain: a protocol for a systematic literature review Domingues, L Cervicalgia Falha de Tratamento Resultado do Tratamento Revisão Sistemática Prognóstico |
title_short |
Prognostic factors for recovery and non-recovery in patients with non-specific neck pain: a protocol for a systematic literature review |
title_full |
Prognostic factors for recovery and non-recovery in patients with non-specific neck pain: a protocol for a systematic literature review |
title_fullStr |
Prognostic factors for recovery and non-recovery in patients with non-specific neck pain: a protocol for a systematic literature review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prognostic factors for recovery and non-recovery in patients with non-specific neck pain: a protocol for a systematic literature review |
title_sort |
Prognostic factors for recovery and non-recovery in patients with non-specific neck pain: a protocol for a systematic literature review |
author |
Domingues, L |
author_facet |
Domingues, L Cruz, EB Pimentel-Santos, FM Ramiro, S Donato, H Manica, SR Hayden, JA Buchbinder, R Branco, JC |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cruz, EB Pimentel-Santos, FM Ramiro, S Donato, H Manica, SR Hayden, JA Buchbinder, R Branco, JC |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
RIHUC |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Domingues, L Cruz, EB Pimentel-Santos, FM Ramiro, S Donato, H Manica, SR Hayden, JA Buchbinder, R Branco, JC |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cervicalgia Falha de Tratamento Resultado do Tratamento Revisão Sistemática Prognóstico |
topic |
Cervicalgia Falha de Tratamento Resultado do Tratamento Revisão Sistemática Prognóstico |
description |
INTRODUCTION: Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder worldwide. It can result in significant disability and impaired quality of life. More than 50% of patients with neck pain still report symptoms 1 year later despite receiving different forms of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment. Identifying patient characteristics that are modifiable or predict recovery and non-recovery for an individual patient might identify ways of improving outcomes. This systematic review aims to comprehensively summarise the existing evidence regarding baseline patient characteristics associated with recovery and non-recovery, as defined by measures of pain intensity, disability and global perceived improvement. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Six electronic databases, PubMed, CINAHL, PEDro Database, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science, will be searched, with terms related to the review question such as neck pain, prognostic or predictive research, from inception to 28 September of 2018. Studies will be included if they have investigated an association between patient characteristics and outcomes, with at least one follow-up time point. Two independent reviewers will screen the titles and abstracts followed by a full-text review to assess papers regarding their eligibility. Data from included papers will be extracted using standardised forms, including study and participants' characteristics, outcomes, prognostic factors and effect size of the association. The risk of bias of each study will be assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. A narrative synthesis will be conducted considering the strength, consistency of results and the methodological quality. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review does not require ethical approval. The results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-review journal, as a chapter of a doctoral thesis and through presentations at national and international conferences. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z 2019-12-09T10:03:02Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/2268 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/2268 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 25;8(11):e023356. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023356 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1817553584352395264 |