Face and content validity of the of the Language Independent Functional Evaluation (L.I.F.E.)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Yam, Julie; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Haig, Andrew J.; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Yamakawa, Karen S. J.; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.47
Resumo: Purpose: Given the global scope of disability, it is important that tools used to measure disability are not biasedby the language or literacy of the respondents. Yet it is impossible to accurately translate tools into the world’s7000 languages. The Language Independent Functional Evaluation (L.I.F.E.) is a video animated functionalassessment that bypasses language and literacy. This study assesses the face validity and content validity of theL.I.F.E.Methods: Rehabilitation professionals and non-rehabilitation students wrote descriptions of the 30 graphicanimations representing functional stages for 11 activities portrayed in the L.I.F.E. The relationship betweendescriptions and the principle L.I.F.E. designer’s description was rated by consensus of three reviewers on a 4-pointagreement scale.Results: Exact agreement was obtained for 82% of 600 responses provided by 12 rehabilitation professionals and8 students. Complete misunderstanding of the concept occurred in only 6% of cases. Most of these were in therealms of bowel, bladder, and mobility. There was no difference in understanding between the professionals(content validity) and students (face validity).Conclusions: The face and content validity of the L.I.F.E. are good enough for users to trust that the test portraysintended functions. This paves the way for easier measurement of functional ability regardless of language orliteracy.Keywords: Disability Evaluation, Language Tests, Physical Therapy Modalities.
id RCAP_4022d238bfdc9b25fac11221e27a226d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.spmfrjournal.org:article/47
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Face and content validity of the of the Language Independent Functional Evaluation (L.I.F.E.)Validade e Consistência Interna da escala "LIFE" - Avaliação Funcional Independente da LinguagemPurpose: Given the global scope of disability, it is important that tools used to measure disability are not biasedby the language or literacy of the respondents. Yet it is impossible to accurately translate tools into the world’s7000 languages. The Language Independent Functional Evaluation (L.I.F.E.) is a video animated functionalassessment that bypasses language and literacy. This study assesses the face validity and content validity of theL.I.F.E.Methods: Rehabilitation professionals and non-rehabilitation students wrote descriptions of the 30 graphicanimations representing functional stages for 11 activities portrayed in the L.I.F.E. The relationship betweendescriptions and the principle L.I.F.E. designer’s description was rated by consensus of three reviewers on a 4-pointagreement scale.Results: Exact agreement was obtained for 82% of 600 responses provided by 12 rehabilitation professionals and8 students. Complete misunderstanding of the concept occurred in only 6% of cases. Most of these were in therealms of bowel, bladder, and mobility. There was no difference in understanding between the professionals(content validity) and students (face validity).Conclusions: The face and content validity of the L.I.F.E. are good enough for users to trust that the test portraysintended functions. This paves the way for easier measurement of functional ability regardless of language orliteracy.Keywords: Disability Evaluation, Language Tests, Physical Therapy Modalities.Purpose: Given the global scope of disability, it is important that tools used to measure disability are not biasedby the language or literacy of the respondents. Yet it is impossible to accurately translate tools into the world’s7000 languages. The Language Independent Functional Evaluation (L.I.F.E.) is a video animated functionalassessment that bypasses language and literacy. This study assesses the face validity and content validity of theL.I.F.E.Methods: Rehabilitation professionals and non-rehabilitation students wrote descriptions of the 30 graphicanimations representing functional stages for 11 activities portrayed in the L.I.F.E. The relationship betweendescriptions and the principle L.I.F.E. designer’s description was rated by consensus of three reviewers on a 4-pointagreement scale.Results: Exact agreement was obtained for 82% of 600 responses provided by 12 rehabilitation professionals and8 students. Complete misunderstanding of the concept occurred in only 6% of cases. Most of these were in therealms of bowel, bladder, and mobility. There was no difference in understanding between the professionals(content validity) and students (face validity).Conclusions: The face and content validity of the L.I.F.E. are good enough for users to trust that the test portraysintended functions. This paves the way for easier measurement of functional ability regardless of language orliteracy.Keywords: Disability Evaluation, Language Tests, Physical Therapy Modalities.Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação2013-03-05T00:00:00Zjournal articlejournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.47oai:ojs.spmfrjournal.org:article/47Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação; v. 18, n. 2 (2009): Ano 17; 16-210872-9204reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://spmfrjournal.org/index.php/spmfr/article/view/47https://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.47https://spmfrjournal.org/index.php/spmfr/article/view/47/51Yam, Julie; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganHaig, Andrew J.; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganYamakawa, Karen S. J.; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-09-20T15:28:51Zoai:ojs.spmfrjournal.org:article/47Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:51:25.341145Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Face and content validity of the of the Language Independent Functional Evaluation (L.I.F.E.)
Validade e Consistência Interna da escala "LIFE" - Avaliação Funcional Independente da Linguagem
title Face and content validity of the of the Language Independent Functional Evaluation (L.I.F.E.)
spellingShingle Face and content validity of the of the Language Independent Functional Evaluation (L.I.F.E.)
Yam, Julie; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
title_short Face and content validity of the of the Language Independent Functional Evaluation (L.I.F.E.)
title_full Face and content validity of the of the Language Independent Functional Evaluation (L.I.F.E.)
title_fullStr Face and content validity of the of the Language Independent Functional Evaluation (L.I.F.E.)
title_full_unstemmed Face and content validity of the of the Language Independent Functional Evaluation (L.I.F.E.)
title_sort Face and content validity of the of the Language Independent Functional Evaluation (L.I.F.E.)
author Yam, Julie; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
author_facet Yam, Julie; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Haig, Andrew J.; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Yamakawa, Karen S. J.; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
author_role author
author2 Haig, Andrew J.; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Yamakawa, Karen S. J.; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Yam, Julie; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Haig, Andrew J.; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Yamakawa, Karen S. J.; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
description Purpose: Given the global scope of disability, it is important that tools used to measure disability are not biasedby the language or literacy of the respondents. Yet it is impossible to accurately translate tools into the world’s7000 languages. The Language Independent Functional Evaluation (L.I.F.E.) is a video animated functionalassessment that bypasses language and literacy. This study assesses the face validity and content validity of theL.I.F.E.Methods: Rehabilitation professionals and non-rehabilitation students wrote descriptions of the 30 graphicanimations representing functional stages for 11 activities portrayed in the L.I.F.E. The relationship betweendescriptions and the principle L.I.F.E. designer’s description was rated by consensus of three reviewers on a 4-pointagreement scale.Results: Exact agreement was obtained for 82% of 600 responses provided by 12 rehabilitation professionals and8 students. Complete misunderstanding of the concept occurred in only 6% of cases. Most of these were in therealms of bowel, bladder, and mobility. There was no difference in understanding between the professionals(content validity) and students (face validity).Conclusions: The face and content validity of the L.I.F.E. are good enough for users to trust that the test portraysintended functions. This paves the way for easier measurement of functional ability regardless of language orliteracy.Keywords: Disability Evaluation, Language Tests, Physical Therapy Modalities.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-03-05T00:00:00Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv journal article
journal article
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.47
oai:ojs.spmfrjournal.org:article/47
url https://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.47
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.spmfrjournal.org:article/47
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://spmfrjournal.org/index.php/spmfr/article/view/47
https://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.47
https://spmfrjournal.org/index.php/spmfr/article/view/47/51
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação; v. 18, n. 2 (2009): Ano 17; 16-21
0872-9204
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130378050469888