CoFI - Consensus on Infant Formulas: The Opinion of Portuguese Experts on Their Composition and Indications

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rêgo, Carla
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Pereira-da-Silva, Luís, Ferreira, Ricardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620
Resumo: Introduction: Breastfeeding has unique health benefits. Exclusive breastfeeding is recommended during the first six months of life and should be maintained during complementary feeding. Alternatively, infant formulas, which are designed to mimic human breastmilk to promote similar metabolic and growth profiles, can be used. This study aimed to assess the opinion of Portuguese paediatricians with expertise in nutrition on the composition, benefits and indications of commercialised infant formulas.Material and Methods: A survey based on the Delphi method with application of a questionnaire developed by a scientific committee was issued to a panel of paediatricians with expertise in nutrition. An initial questionnaire that included 65 items covering 11 areas was administered in two rounds.Results: Twenty-one experts participated, and the final response rate was 87.5%. The panel was in agreement in 68.3% of the enquired items, namely that infant formulas should be used only when breastfeeding is not possible. Notwithstanding, the opinion of the panel was heterogeneous on a number of issues, particularly those related to the advantages and indications of ‘special’ or modified infant formulas (partially hydrolysed formulas and anti-colic, anti-constipation and anti-regurgitation formulas) and of young child formulas (‘growing-up formulas’).Discussion: A wide consensus was recorded on the nutritional quality, food safety and indications attributed to commercialized infant formulas.Conclusion: The opinion of Portuguese experts was consensual in most of the enquired topics. The absence of consensus was mostly related to issues that remain under debate in the literature and lack robust scientific evidence.
id RCAP_4067875fdfabbf12d4b42b532b8b249f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/10620
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling CoFI - Consensus on Infant Formulas: The Opinion of Portuguese Experts on Their Composition and IndicationsCoFI - Consenso Sobre Fórmulas Infantis: A Opinião de Peritos Portugueses sobre a Sua Composição e IndicaçõesConsensusDelphi TechniqueInfant FormulaConsensoFórmulas InfantisTécnica DelphiIntroduction: Breastfeeding has unique health benefits. Exclusive breastfeeding is recommended during the first six months of life and should be maintained during complementary feeding. Alternatively, infant formulas, which are designed to mimic human breastmilk to promote similar metabolic and growth profiles, can be used. This study aimed to assess the opinion of Portuguese paediatricians with expertise in nutrition on the composition, benefits and indications of commercialised infant formulas.Material and Methods: A survey based on the Delphi method with application of a questionnaire developed by a scientific committee was issued to a panel of paediatricians with expertise in nutrition. An initial questionnaire that included 65 items covering 11 areas was administered in two rounds.Results: Twenty-one experts participated, and the final response rate was 87.5%. The panel was in agreement in 68.3% of the enquired items, namely that infant formulas should be used only when breastfeeding is not possible. Notwithstanding, the opinion of the panel was heterogeneous on a number of issues, particularly those related to the advantages and indications of ‘special’ or modified infant formulas (partially hydrolysed formulas and anti-colic, anti-constipation and anti-regurgitation formulas) and of young child formulas (‘growing-up formulas’).Discussion: A wide consensus was recorded on the nutritional quality, food safety and indications attributed to commercialized infant formulas.Conclusion: The opinion of Portuguese experts was consensual in most of the enquired topics. The absence of consensus was mostly related to issues that remain under debate in the literature and lack robust scientific evidence.Introdução: O aleitamento materno tem benefícios únicos, sendo recomendado em exclusividade até ao sexto mês de idade e mantido durante a diversificação alimentar. Como alternativa, podem ser usadas fórmulas infantis, as quais procuram mimetizar o leite humano, promovendo um perfil metabólico e de crescimento semelhantes. Este estudo pretendeu avaliar a opinião de pediatras portugueses relativamente à composição, alegados benefícios e indicações das fórmulas infantis comercializadas em Portugal.Material e Métodos: Estudo baseado no método de Delphi, com a aplicação de um questionário desenvolvido por uma comissão científica a um painel de pediatras peritos em nutrição pediátrica. O questionário foi aplicado em duas voltas, tendo a versão inicial 65 itens abrangendo 11 temas.Resultados: Participaram 21 peritos, tendo sido atingida, após as duas voltas, 87,5% de respostas. Este painel foi consensual em 68,3% dos itens, nomeadamente na indicação das fórmulas infantis apenas nos que não podem beneficiar de aleitamento materno. O painel teve opiniões heterogéneas numa série de questões, destacando-se as relacionadas com vantagens e indicações das fórmulas ‘especiais’ ou modificadas (hidrólise parcial da proteína, anticólica, antirregurgitação e antiobstipação) e das fórmulas ‘de crescimento’ durante o segundo ano de vida.Discussão: Houve um consenso alargado dos peritos quanto à qualidade nutricional, segurança alimentar e indicações atribuídas às fórmulas infantis comercializadas, nomeadamente as fórmulas para lactente e de transição.Conclusão: O painel foi consensual relativamente à maioria dos tópicos inquiridos. A ausência de consenso verificou-se, de forma geral, em questões que na literatura permanecem em debate e carecem de evidência científica robusta.Ordem dos Médicos2018-12-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/mswordimage/tiffimage/tiffimage/tiffapplication/pdfapplication/mswordapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/10620Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 31 No. 12 (2018): December; 754-765Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 31 N.º 12 (2018): Dezembro; 754-7651646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/5555https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/6069https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/5556https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/5557https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/10205https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/10206https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/10207https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/10208https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/10247https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/10504https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/10683Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRêgo, CarlaPereira-da-Silva, LuísFerreira, Ricardo2022-12-20T11:06:02Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/10620Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:19:54.825910Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CoFI - Consensus on Infant Formulas: The Opinion of Portuguese Experts on Their Composition and Indications
CoFI - Consenso Sobre Fórmulas Infantis: A Opinião de Peritos Portugueses sobre a Sua Composição e Indicações
title CoFI - Consensus on Infant Formulas: The Opinion of Portuguese Experts on Their Composition and Indications
spellingShingle CoFI - Consensus on Infant Formulas: The Opinion of Portuguese Experts on Their Composition and Indications
Rêgo, Carla
Consensus
Delphi Technique
Infant Formula
Consenso
Fórmulas Infantis
Técnica Delphi
title_short CoFI - Consensus on Infant Formulas: The Opinion of Portuguese Experts on Their Composition and Indications
title_full CoFI - Consensus on Infant Formulas: The Opinion of Portuguese Experts on Their Composition and Indications
title_fullStr CoFI - Consensus on Infant Formulas: The Opinion of Portuguese Experts on Their Composition and Indications
title_full_unstemmed CoFI - Consensus on Infant Formulas: The Opinion of Portuguese Experts on Their Composition and Indications
title_sort CoFI - Consensus on Infant Formulas: The Opinion of Portuguese Experts on Their Composition and Indications
author Rêgo, Carla
author_facet Rêgo, Carla
Pereira-da-Silva, Luís
Ferreira, Ricardo
author_role author
author2 Pereira-da-Silva, Luís
Ferreira, Ricardo
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rêgo, Carla
Pereira-da-Silva, Luís
Ferreira, Ricardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Consensus
Delphi Technique
Infant Formula
Consenso
Fórmulas Infantis
Técnica Delphi
topic Consensus
Delphi Technique
Infant Formula
Consenso
Fórmulas Infantis
Técnica Delphi
description Introduction: Breastfeeding has unique health benefits. Exclusive breastfeeding is recommended during the first six months of life and should be maintained during complementary feeding. Alternatively, infant formulas, which are designed to mimic human breastmilk to promote similar metabolic and growth profiles, can be used. This study aimed to assess the opinion of Portuguese paediatricians with expertise in nutrition on the composition, benefits and indications of commercialised infant formulas.Material and Methods: A survey based on the Delphi method with application of a questionnaire developed by a scientific committee was issued to a panel of paediatricians with expertise in nutrition. An initial questionnaire that included 65 items covering 11 areas was administered in two rounds.Results: Twenty-one experts participated, and the final response rate was 87.5%. The panel was in agreement in 68.3% of the enquired items, namely that infant formulas should be used only when breastfeeding is not possible. Notwithstanding, the opinion of the panel was heterogeneous on a number of issues, particularly those related to the advantages and indications of ‘special’ or modified infant formulas (partially hydrolysed formulas and anti-colic, anti-constipation and anti-regurgitation formulas) and of young child formulas (‘growing-up formulas’).Discussion: A wide consensus was recorded on the nutritional quality, food safety and indications attributed to commercialized infant formulas.Conclusion: The opinion of Portuguese experts was consensual in most of the enquired topics. The absence of consensus was mostly related to issues that remain under debate in the literature and lack robust scientific evidence.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-28
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/10620
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/10620
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/5555
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/6069
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/5556
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/5557
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/10205
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/10206
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/10207
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/10208
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/10247
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/10504
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10620/10683
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Acta Médica Portuguesa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Acta Médica Portuguesa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/msword
image/tiff
image/tiff
image/tiff
application/pdf
application/msword
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 31 No. 12 (2018): December; 754-765
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 31 N.º 12 (2018): Dezembro; 754-765
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130648489754624