Nudging the nudges: A probe into transparency effects
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/30616 |
Resumo: | Traditionally, economic models relied on rationality, assuming that people were utility maximizers with perfect information capabilities. These assumptions were abandoned as several psychologists and economists have demonstrated that individuals are subject to biases and cognitive failures. Within this realm, nudge theory, which states that our behavior can be effectively influenced through interventions, has shed light on how our judgment is systematically biased and altered by the decision making architecture. Among the ongoing discussion on the effectiveness and empirical application of nudges, a central question remains unanswered: are nudges effective only as far as they are not realized consciously by the target? This question naturally precedes a second question: Aren’t overt nudges more ethical than covert ones? To address this research gap, this study aims to determine how ascribed benevolence affects nudge effectiveness through transparency. Based on a sample of two groups (a pre-test on 86 participants and a test group of 141 participants), a 2x2 experimental study was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned to four distinct scenarios, characterized by variations in benevolence and transparency factors. These scenarios shared a common stimulus which had an anchoring nudge effect in a task involving a donation decision. The results indicate that disclosing nudges did not have a detrimental effect on donation behavior and that organizations perceived as more benevolent tend to receive greater donations. Furthermore, results emphasize the importance of considering the ascribed benevolence of the source. |
id |
RCAP_4206f2abfaf57ae8a09b7a125e07d759 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/30616 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Nudging the nudges: A probe into transparency effectsEconomia comportamental -- Behavioral economicsArquitetura da escolha -- Nudge theoryAnchoringBenevolenceTransparencyAncoragemBenevolênciaTransparênciaTraditionally, economic models relied on rationality, assuming that people were utility maximizers with perfect information capabilities. These assumptions were abandoned as several psychologists and economists have demonstrated that individuals are subject to biases and cognitive failures. Within this realm, nudge theory, which states that our behavior can be effectively influenced through interventions, has shed light on how our judgment is systematically biased and altered by the decision making architecture. Among the ongoing discussion on the effectiveness and empirical application of nudges, a central question remains unanswered: are nudges effective only as far as they are not realized consciously by the target? This question naturally precedes a second question: Aren’t overt nudges more ethical than covert ones? To address this research gap, this study aims to determine how ascribed benevolence affects nudge effectiveness through transparency. Based on a sample of two groups (a pre-test on 86 participants and a test group of 141 participants), a 2x2 experimental study was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned to four distinct scenarios, characterized by variations in benevolence and transparency factors. These scenarios shared a common stimulus which had an anchoring nudge effect in a task involving a donation decision. The results indicate that disclosing nudges did not have a detrimental effect on donation behavior and that organizations perceived as more benevolent tend to receive greater donations. Furthermore, results emphasize the importance of considering the ascribed benevolence of the source.Tradicionalmente, os modelos económicos baseavam-se na racionalidade, assumindo que os indivíduos eram maximizadoras de utilidade com informação perfeita. Estes pressupostos já não refletem a realidade atual, visto que psicólogos e economistas comprovaram que os indivíduos têm enviesamentos e falhas cognitivas. Neste contexto, a teoria nudge, que afirma que o comportamento pode ser influenciado, destacou como a arquitetura da tomada de decisão distorce a nossa escolha. Na discussão sobre a eficácia e a aplicação empírica de nudges, uma questão permanece sem resposta: nudges são apenas eficazes quando não são percebidas conscientemente pelo indivíduo? Esta naturalmente antecede outra: as nudges explícitas são mais éticas que as ocultas? Para aferir esta falha empírica, este estudo tem como objetivo medir como a benevolência afeta o efeito transparência na eficácia de uma nudge. Com base numa amostra de dois grupos (um de pre-teste com 86 participantes e outro de teste com 141 participantes), um estudo experimental 2x2 foi conduzido. Este foi feito através da alocação aleatória dos participantes a quatro cenários caracterizados por variações de benevolência e transparência. Os cenários partilhavam um estímulo comum que gerava o efeito nudge de ancoragem na decisão de fazer uma doação. Os resultados indicam que a divulgação da nudge não influencia a doação de um indivíduo e que as organizações consideradas mais benevolentes tendem a receber mais doações. Não obstante, os resultados refletem a importância da benevolência atribuída à organização que espoleta a nudge.2024-01-26T10:49:12Z2023-12-19T00:00:00Z2023-12-192023-09info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/30616TID:203463323engMonteiro, Tiago Alexandre Paçô Galizainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-28T01:20:11Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/30616Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:58:18.309234Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Nudging the nudges: A probe into transparency effects |
title |
Nudging the nudges: A probe into transparency effects |
spellingShingle |
Nudging the nudges: A probe into transparency effects Monteiro, Tiago Alexandre Paçô Galiza Economia comportamental -- Behavioral economics Arquitetura da escolha -- Nudge theory Anchoring Benevolence Transparency Ancoragem Benevolência Transparência |
title_short |
Nudging the nudges: A probe into transparency effects |
title_full |
Nudging the nudges: A probe into transparency effects |
title_fullStr |
Nudging the nudges: A probe into transparency effects |
title_full_unstemmed |
Nudging the nudges: A probe into transparency effects |
title_sort |
Nudging the nudges: A probe into transparency effects |
author |
Monteiro, Tiago Alexandre Paçô Galiza |
author_facet |
Monteiro, Tiago Alexandre Paçô Galiza |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Monteiro, Tiago Alexandre Paçô Galiza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Economia comportamental -- Behavioral economics Arquitetura da escolha -- Nudge theory Anchoring Benevolence Transparency Ancoragem Benevolência Transparência |
topic |
Economia comportamental -- Behavioral economics Arquitetura da escolha -- Nudge theory Anchoring Benevolence Transparency Ancoragem Benevolência Transparência |
description |
Traditionally, economic models relied on rationality, assuming that people were utility maximizers with perfect information capabilities. These assumptions were abandoned as several psychologists and economists have demonstrated that individuals are subject to biases and cognitive failures. Within this realm, nudge theory, which states that our behavior can be effectively influenced through interventions, has shed light on how our judgment is systematically biased and altered by the decision making architecture. Among the ongoing discussion on the effectiveness and empirical application of nudges, a central question remains unanswered: are nudges effective only as far as they are not realized consciously by the target? This question naturally precedes a second question: Aren’t overt nudges more ethical than covert ones? To address this research gap, this study aims to determine how ascribed benevolence affects nudge effectiveness through transparency. Based on a sample of two groups (a pre-test on 86 participants and a test group of 141 participants), a 2x2 experimental study was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned to four distinct scenarios, characterized by variations in benevolence and transparency factors. These scenarios shared a common stimulus which had an anchoring nudge effect in a task involving a donation decision. The results indicate that disclosing nudges did not have a detrimental effect on donation behavior and that organizations perceived as more benevolent tend to receive greater donations. Furthermore, results emphasize the importance of considering the ascribed benevolence of the source. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-19T00:00:00Z 2023-12-19 2023-09 2024-01-26T10:49:12Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/30616 TID:203463323 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/30616 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:203463323 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137067844763648 |