Slow-release N fertilisers are not an alternative to urea for fertilisation of autumn-grown tall cabbage

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, M.A.
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Santos, H., Ruivo, Sérgio, Arrobas, Margarida
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10198/2193
Resumo: Tall cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. costata, cv. Penca de Mirandela) is grown in Portugal during autumn and winter months when heavy rains can be expected. In this agrosystem the management of N is a considerable challenge due to the risk of nitrate leaching. Field experiments with tall cabbage and rye were carried out during the growing seasons of 2007/2008 and 2008/2009. The experimental design included three fertilisers that delay N availability by different mechanisms [Floranid permanent, containing isobutylidene diurea (IBDU); Basacote, a polymer-coated fertiliser; and Entec 26, containing 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) as nitrification inhibitor], two urea treatments (total N applied basally; and divided into two equal rates in preplant and topdress application), and a zero N control. The fertilisers were applied at a rate of 120 kg N ha−1. A pot experiment with tall cabbage followed by ryegrass grown in the same pots was carried out in 2007/2008. The fertiliser treatments were essentially the same and a rate of 2.94 g N/pot was applied. Dry matter yield, plant N concentration, plant N recovery and indices of N-use efficiency were compared among the fertiliser treatments. In the pot experiment, soil nitrate concentration was also monitored by using anion exchange membranes inserted directly into the soil. Urea produced mean DM yields statistically higher than control in all crops and in both field and pot experiments and years. No significant differences in DM yield were usually found among fertilised treatments. Basacote produced DM yields often not significantly different from that of control. In the field experiment of tall cabbage, plants recovered 20 and 50% of the amount of N applied, respectively in Basacote and in the other fertilised plots. In the pot experiment, tall cabbage + ryegrass recovered 49.6 and ≈100% of N applied, respectively in Basacote and in the other fertilised plots. From the strictly agronomic point of view, none of the slow-release N materials provided advantages over urea to be advised for this agrosystem, considering also their high cost.
id RCAP_42d6d669482f37d2e9ed9bcd43b6b991
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/2193
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Slow-release N fertilisers are not an alternative to urea for fertilisation of autumn-grown tall cabbageSlow-release fertiliserControlled-release fertiliserStabilized fertiliserIsobutylidene diurea (IBDU/Isodur)3,4-Dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP)Tall cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. costata, cv. Penca de Mirandela) is grown in Portugal during autumn and winter months when heavy rains can be expected. In this agrosystem the management of N is a considerable challenge due to the risk of nitrate leaching. Field experiments with tall cabbage and rye were carried out during the growing seasons of 2007/2008 and 2008/2009. The experimental design included three fertilisers that delay N availability by different mechanisms [Floranid permanent, containing isobutylidene diurea (IBDU); Basacote, a polymer-coated fertiliser; and Entec 26, containing 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) as nitrification inhibitor], two urea treatments (total N applied basally; and divided into two equal rates in preplant and topdress application), and a zero N control. The fertilisers were applied at a rate of 120 kg N ha−1. A pot experiment with tall cabbage followed by ryegrass grown in the same pots was carried out in 2007/2008. The fertiliser treatments were essentially the same and a rate of 2.94 g N/pot was applied. Dry matter yield, plant N concentration, plant N recovery and indices of N-use efficiency were compared among the fertiliser treatments. In the pot experiment, soil nitrate concentration was also monitored by using anion exchange membranes inserted directly into the soil. Urea produced mean DM yields statistically higher than control in all crops and in both field and pot experiments and years. No significant differences in DM yield were usually found among fertilised treatments. Basacote produced DM yields often not significantly different from that of control. In the field experiment of tall cabbage, plants recovered 20 and 50% of the amount of N applied, respectively in Basacote and in the other fertilised plots. In the pot experiment, tall cabbage + ryegrass recovered 49.6 and ≈100% of N applied, respectively in Basacote and in the other fertilised plots. From the strictly agronomic point of view, none of the slow-release N materials provided advantages over urea to be advised for this agrosystem, considering also their high cost.ElsevierBiblioteca Digital do IPBRodrigues, M.A.Santos, H.Ruivo, SérgioArrobas, Margarida2010-03-04T16:27:49Z20102010-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10198/2193engEuropean Journal of Agronomy. ISSN 1161-0301. 32:2 (2010) p. 137-1431161-030110.1016/j.eja.2009.09.003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-21T10:06:52Zoai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/2193Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:55:36.116235Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Slow-release N fertilisers are not an alternative to urea for fertilisation of autumn-grown tall cabbage
title Slow-release N fertilisers are not an alternative to urea for fertilisation of autumn-grown tall cabbage
spellingShingle Slow-release N fertilisers are not an alternative to urea for fertilisation of autumn-grown tall cabbage
Rodrigues, M.A.
Slow-release fertiliser
Controlled-release fertiliser
Stabilized fertiliser
Isobutylidene diurea (IBDU/Isodur)
3,4-Dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP)
title_short Slow-release N fertilisers are not an alternative to urea for fertilisation of autumn-grown tall cabbage
title_full Slow-release N fertilisers are not an alternative to urea for fertilisation of autumn-grown tall cabbage
title_fullStr Slow-release N fertilisers are not an alternative to urea for fertilisation of autumn-grown tall cabbage
title_full_unstemmed Slow-release N fertilisers are not an alternative to urea for fertilisation of autumn-grown tall cabbage
title_sort Slow-release N fertilisers are not an alternative to urea for fertilisation of autumn-grown tall cabbage
author Rodrigues, M.A.
author_facet Rodrigues, M.A.
Santos, H.
Ruivo, Sérgio
Arrobas, Margarida
author_role author
author2 Santos, H.
Ruivo, Sérgio
Arrobas, Margarida
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital do IPB
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, M.A.
Santos, H.
Ruivo, Sérgio
Arrobas, Margarida
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Slow-release fertiliser
Controlled-release fertiliser
Stabilized fertiliser
Isobutylidene diurea (IBDU/Isodur)
3,4-Dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP)
topic Slow-release fertiliser
Controlled-release fertiliser
Stabilized fertiliser
Isobutylidene diurea (IBDU/Isodur)
3,4-Dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP)
description Tall cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. costata, cv. Penca de Mirandela) is grown in Portugal during autumn and winter months when heavy rains can be expected. In this agrosystem the management of N is a considerable challenge due to the risk of nitrate leaching. Field experiments with tall cabbage and rye were carried out during the growing seasons of 2007/2008 and 2008/2009. The experimental design included three fertilisers that delay N availability by different mechanisms [Floranid permanent, containing isobutylidene diurea (IBDU); Basacote, a polymer-coated fertiliser; and Entec 26, containing 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) as nitrification inhibitor], two urea treatments (total N applied basally; and divided into two equal rates in preplant and topdress application), and a zero N control. The fertilisers were applied at a rate of 120 kg N ha−1. A pot experiment with tall cabbage followed by ryegrass grown in the same pots was carried out in 2007/2008. The fertiliser treatments were essentially the same and a rate of 2.94 g N/pot was applied. Dry matter yield, plant N concentration, plant N recovery and indices of N-use efficiency were compared among the fertiliser treatments. In the pot experiment, soil nitrate concentration was also monitored by using anion exchange membranes inserted directly into the soil. Urea produced mean DM yields statistically higher than control in all crops and in both field and pot experiments and years. No significant differences in DM yield were usually found among fertilised treatments. Basacote produced DM yields often not significantly different from that of control. In the field experiment of tall cabbage, plants recovered 20 and 50% of the amount of N applied, respectively in Basacote and in the other fertilised plots. In the pot experiment, tall cabbage + ryegrass recovered 49.6 and ≈100% of N applied, respectively in Basacote and in the other fertilised plots. From the strictly agronomic point of view, none of the slow-release N materials provided advantages over urea to be advised for this agrosystem, considering also their high cost.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-03-04T16:27:49Z
2010
2010-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10198/2193
url http://hdl.handle.net/10198/2193
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv European Journal of Agronomy. ISSN 1161-0301. 32:2 (2010) p. 137-143
1161-0301
10.1016/j.eja.2009.09.003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135160508088320