The Bundesverfassungsgericht PSPP Decision : a blow to the European project

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Menano, Francisco Inpotong Castro
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/34790
Resumo: The German Federal Constitutional Court sent shockwaves across Europe on 5 May 2020, when it declared a ruling by the European Court of Justice and ECB decisions as ultra vires and established a three-month transitional period for the ECB Governing Council to provide further justification in order to ascertain the legality of its measures, which the ECJ had already confirmed. The ruling is unprecedented and is likely to inflame the already existing tensions between national and European sovereignty. This is more so when the contested ECB programme amounts to the Public Sector Purchase Programme, an exceptional bond-buying measure launched in 2015 and deemed pivotal to combat the lasting effects of the European sovereign debt crisis. In times of increased spending by the EU, the schism between net contributors and beneficiaries is prone to show and is likely deepened by the asymmetric impact of economic crises on MS. As Europe faces the rise of nationalism, a public health crisis and a consequent economic crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, the decision could not have come at a worse time. The Bundesverfassunsgericht’s ruling is one that underscores dissent at a time where solidarity is much needed. The decision constitutes a significant drawback to the consistency and effectiveness of the EU legal order as it openly defies well-established rules and foundations. Furthermore, it is likely to serve as an opportunity for illiberal regimes to push their anti-rule of law agenda as well as pave the way for the undermining of further exceptional ECB programmes such as the Pandemic Emergency Purchase Programme.
id RCAP_42ed219e5ac18bf5ba404152f63f2c22
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/34790
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The Bundesverfassungsgericht PSPP Decision : a blow to the European projectPSPP decisionGerman constituional courtPrimacyRule of lawDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::DireitoThe German Federal Constitutional Court sent shockwaves across Europe on 5 May 2020, when it declared a ruling by the European Court of Justice and ECB decisions as ultra vires and established a three-month transitional period for the ECB Governing Council to provide further justification in order to ascertain the legality of its measures, which the ECJ had already confirmed. The ruling is unprecedented and is likely to inflame the already existing tensions between national and European sovereignty. This is more so when the contested ECB programme amounts to the Public Sector Purchase Programme, an exceptional bond-buying measure launched in 2015 and deemed pivotal to combat the lasting effects of the European sovereign debt crisis. In times of increased spending by the EU, the schism between net contributors and beneficiaries is prone to show and is likely deepened by the asymmetric impact of economic crises on MS. As Europe faces the rise of nationalism, a public health crisis and a consequent economic crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, the decision could not have come at a worse time. The Bundesverfassunsgericht’s ruling is one that underscores dissent at a time where solidarity is much needed. The decision constitutes a significant drawback to the consistency and effectiveness of the EU legal order as it openly defies well-established rules and foundations. Furthermore, it is likely to serve as an opportunity for illiberal regimes to push their anti-rule of law agenda as well as pave the way for the undermining of further exceptional ECB programmes such as the Pandemic Emergency Purchase Programme.Maduro, Luís Miguel Poiares PessoaVeritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica PortuguesaMenano, Francisco Inpotong Castro2021-09-13T15:17:02Z2021-07-2820212021-07-28T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/34790TID:202747808enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-12T17:40:19Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/34790Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:28:12.739766Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Bundesverfassungsgericht PSPP Decision : a blow to the European project
title The Bundesverfassungsgericht PSPP Decision : a blow to the European project
spellingShingle The Bundesverfassungsgericht PSPP Decision : a blow to the European project
Menano, Francisco Inpotong Castro
PSPP decision
German constituional court
Primacy
Rule of law
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Direito
title_short The Bundesverfassungsgericht PSPP Decision : a blow to the European project
title_full The Bundesverfassungsgericht PSPP Decision : a blow to the European project
title_fullStr The Bundesverfassungsgericht PSPP Decision : a blow to the European project
title_full_unstemmed The Bundesverfassungsgericht PSPP Decision : a blow to the European project
title_sort The Bundesverfassungsgericht PSPP Decision : a blow to the European project
author Menano, Francisco Inpotong Castro
author_facet Menano, Francisco Inpotong Castro
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Maduro, Luís Miguel Poiares Pessoa
Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Menano, Francisco Inpotong Castro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv PSPP decision
German constituional court
Primacy
Rule of law
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Direito
topic PSPP decision
German constituional court
Primacy
Rule of law
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Direito
description The German Federal Constitutional Court sent shockwaves across Europe on 5 May 2020, when it declared a ruling by the European Court of Justice and ECB decisions as ultra vires and established a three-month transitional period for the ECB Governing Council to provide further justification in order to ascertain the legality of its measures, which the ECJ had already confirmed. The ruling is unprecedented and is likely to inflame the already existing tensions between national and European sovereignty. This is more so when the contested ECB programme amounts to the Public Sector Purchase Programme, an exceptional bond-buying measure launched in 2015 and deemed pivotal to combat the lasting effects of the European sovereign debt crisis. In times of increased spending by the EU, the schism between net contributors and beneficiaries is prone to show and is likely deepened by the asymmetric impact of economic crises on MS. As Europe faces the rise of nationalism, a public health crisis and a consequent economic crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, the decision could not have come at a worse time. The Bundesverfassunsgericht’s ruling is one that underscores dissent at a time where solidarity is much needed. The decision constitutes a significant drawback to the consistency and effectiveness of the EU legal order as it openly defies well-established rules and foundations. Furthermore, it is likely to serve as an opportunity for illiberal regimes to push their anti-rule of law agenda as well as pave the way for the undermining of further exceptional ECB programmes such as the Pandemic Emergency Purchase Programme.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-13T15:17:02Z
2021-07-28
2021
2021-07-28T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/34790
TID:202747808
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/34790
identifier_str_mv TID:202747808
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132000475414528