Characterizing industry-academia collaborations in software engineering: evidence from 101 projects

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Garousi, Vahid
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Pfahl, Dietmar, Fernandes, João M., Felderer, Michael, Mäntylä, Mika V., Shepherd, David, Arcuri, Andrea, Coşkunçay, Ahmet, Tekinerdogan, Bedir
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/66602
Resumo: Research collaboration between industry and academia supports improvement and innovation in industry and helps ensure the industrial relevance of academic research. However, many researchers and practitioners in the community believe that the level of joint industry-academia collaboration (IAC) projects in Software Engineering (SE) research is relatively low, creating a barrier between research and practice. The goal of the empirical study reported in this paper is to explore and characterize the state of IAC with respect to industrial needs, developed solutions, impacts of the projects and also a set of challenges, patterns and anti-patterns identified by a recent Systematic Literature Review (SLR) study. To address the above goal, we conducted an opinion survey among researchers and practitioners with respect to their experience in IAC. Our dataset includes 101 data points from IAC projects conducted in 21 different countries. Our findings include: (1) the most popular topics of the IAC projects, in the dataset, are: software testing, quality, process, and project managements; (2) over 90% of IAC projects result in at least one publication; (3) almost 50% of IACs are initiated by industry, busting the myth that industry tends to avoid IACs; and (4) 61% of the IAC projects report having a positive impact on their industrial context, while 31% report no noticeable impacts or were “not sure”. To improve this situation, we present evidence-based recommendations to increase the success of IAC projects, such as the importance of testing pilot solutions before using them in industry. This study aims to contribute to the body of evidence in the area of IAC, and benefit researchers and practitioners. Using the data and evidence presented in this paper, they can conduct more successful IAC projects in SE by being aware of the challenges and how to overcome them, by applying best practices (patterns), and by preventing anti-patterns.
id RCAP_4435b06f97317da91a91fd6ff0df91f1
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/66602
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Characterizing industry-academia collaborations in software engineering: evidence from 101 projectsSoftware engineeringIndustry-academia collaborationsChallengesPatternsBest practicesAnti-patternsEmpirical studyEvidenceEngenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Eletrotécnica, Eletrónica e InformáticaScience & TechnologyResearch collaboration between industry and academia supports improvement and innovation in industry and helps ensure the industrial relevance of academic research. However, many researchers and practitioners in the community believe that the level of joint industry-academia collaboration (IAC) projects in Software Engineering (SE) research is relatively low, creating a barrier between research and practice. The goal of the empirical study reported in this paper is to explore and characterize the state of IAC with respect to industrial needs, developed solutions, impacts of the projects and also a set of challenges, patterns and anti-patterns identified by a recent Systematic Literature Review (SLR) study. To address the above goal, we conducted an opinion survey among researchers and practitioners with respect to their experience in IAC. Our dataset includes 101 data points from IAC projects conducted in 21 different countries. Our findings include: (1) the most popular topics of the IAC projects, in the dataset, are: software testing, quality, process, and project managements; (2) over 90% of IAC projects result in at least one publication; (3) almost 50% of IACs are initiated by industry, busting the myth that industry tends to avoid IACs; and (4) 61% of the IAC projects report having a positive impact on their industrial context, while 31% report no noticeable impacts or were “not sure”. To improve this situation, we present evidence-based recommendations to increase the success of IAC projects, such as the importance of testing pilot solutions before using them in industry. This study aims to contribute to the body of evidence in the area of IAC, and benefit researchers and practitioners. Using the data and evidence presented in this paper, they can conduct more successful IAC projects in SE by being aware of the challenges and how to overcome them, by applying best practices (patterns), and by preventing anti-patterns.The authors would like to thank the researchers and practitioners who participated in this survey. João M. Fernandes was supported by FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia) within the Project Scope UID/CEC/00319/2013. Dietmar Pfahl was supported by the institutional research grant IUT20-55 of the Estonian Research Council. Andrea Arcuri was supported by the Research Council of Norway (grant agreement No 274385). Mika Mäntylä was partially supported by Academy of Finland grant and ITEA3 / TEKES grant.SpringerUniversidade do MinhoGarousi, VahidPfahl, DietmarFernandes, João M.Felderer, MichaelMäntylä, Mika V.Shepherd, DavidArcuri, AndreaCoşkunçay, AhmetTekinerdogan, Bedir20192019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/66602engGarousi V, Pfahl D, Fernandes JM, Felderer M, Mäntylä MV, Shepherd D, Arcuri A, Coşkunçay A e Tekinerdogan B; Characterizing industry-academia collaborations in software engineering: Evidence from 101 projects, Empirical Software Engineering 24(4):2540-2602, Springer, ago/20191382-325610.1007/s10664-019-09711-yhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10664-019-09711-yinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:11:08Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/66602Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:02:50.815025Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Characterizing industry-academia collaborations in software engineering: evidence from 101 projects
title Characterizing industry-academia collaborations in software engineering: evidence from 101 projects
spellingShingle Characterizing industry-academia collaborations in software engineering: evidence from 101 projects
Garousi, Vahid
Software engineering
Industry-academia collaborations
Challenges
Patterns
Best practices
Anti-patterns
Empirical study
Evidence
Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Eletrotécnica, Eletrónica e Informática
Science & Technology
title_short Characterizing industry-academia collaborations in software engineering: evidence from 101 projects
title_full Characterizing industry-academia collaborations in software engineering: evidence from 101 projects
title_fullStr Characterizing industry-academia collaborations in software engineering: evidence from 101 projects
title_full_unstemmed Characterizing industry-academia collaborations in software engineering: evidence from 101 projects
title_sort Characterizing industry-academia collaborations in software engineering: evidence from 101 projects
author Garousi, Vahid
author_facet Garousi, Vahid
Pfahl, Dietmar
Fernandes, João M.
Felderer, Michael
Mäntylä, Mika V.
Shepherd, David
Arcuri, Andrea
Coşkunçay, Ahmet
Tekinerdogan, Bedir
author_role author
author2 Pfahl, Dietmar
Fernandes, João M.
Felderer, Michael
Mäntylä, Mika V.
Shepherd, David
Arcuri, Andrea
Coşkunçay, Ahmet
Tekinerdogan, Bedir
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Garousi, Vahid
Pfahl, Dietmar
Fernandes, João M.
Felderer, Michael
Mäntylä, Mika V.
Shepherd, David
Arcuri, Andrea
Coşkunçay, Ahmet
Tekinerdogan, Bedir
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Software engineering
Industry-academia collaborations
Challenges
Patterns
Best practices
Anti-patterns
Empirical study
Evidence
Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Eletrotécnica, Eletrónica e Informática
Science & Technology
topic Software engineering
Industry-academia collaborations
Challenges
Patterns
Best practices
Anti-patterns
Empirical study
Evidence
Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Eletrotécnica, Eletrónica e Informática
Science & Technology
description Research collaboration between industry and academia supports improvement and innovation in industry and helps ensure the industrial relevance of academic research. However, many researchers and practitioners in the community believe that the level of joint industry-academia collaboration (IAC) projects in Software Engineering (SE) research is relatively low, creating a barrier between research and practice. The goal of the empirical study reported in this paper is to explore and characterize the state of IAC with respect to industrial needs, developed solutions, impacts of the projects and also a set of challenges, patterns and anti-patterns identified by a recent Systematic Literature Review (SLR) study. To address the above goal, we conducted an opinion survey among researchers and practitioners with respect to their experience in IAC. Our dataset includes 101 data points from IAC projects conducted in 21 different countries. Our findings include: (1) the most popular topics of the IAC projects, in the dataset, are: software testing, quality, process, and project managements; (2) over 90% of IAC projects result in at least one publication; (3) almost 50% of IACs are initiated by industry, busting the myth that industry tends to avoid IACs; and (4) 61% of the IAC projects report having a positive impact on their industrial context, while 31% report no noticeable impacts or were “not sure”. To improve this situation, we present evidence-based recommendations to increase the success of IAC projects, such as the importance of testing pilot solutions before using them in industry. This study aims to contribute to the body of evidence in the area of IAC, and benefit researchers and practitioners. Using the data and evidence presented in this paper, they can conduct more successful IAC projects in SE by being aware of the challenges and how to overcome them, by applying best practices (patterns), and by preventing anti-patterns.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/66602
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/66602
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Garousi V, Pfahl D, Fernandes JM, Felderer M, Mäntylä MV, Shepherd D, Arcuri A, Coşkunçay A e Tekinerdogan B; Characterizing industry-academia collaborations in software engineering: Evidence from 101 projects, Empirical Software Engineering 24(4):2540-2602, Springer, ago/2019
1382-3256
10.1007/s10664-019-09711-y
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10664-019-09711-y
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132432015818752