Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Feitosa, Wellington G.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Barbosa, Tiago M., Correia, Ricardo de Assis, Castro, Flávio A. de Souza
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10198/22374
Resumo: Peak and maximal oxygen uptake (V_O2peak and V_O2max, respectively) are used in assessing aerobic power. For swimmers with physical impairments, it is unclear whether the physiological variables obtained in 200-m and Nx200-m tests are similar. The objective of this study is to assess the validity of V_O2peak as an estimator of V_O2max and complementary physiological variables, in particular, carbon dioxide production (V_ CO2), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), minute-ventilation (V_ EÞ and absolute (HR) and relative (%HRmax) heart rates—which were obtained in a time trial test (200- m) and an incremental intermittent test (Nx200-m) performed by swimmers with physical impairments. Methods: Eleven well-trained swimmers with physical impairments performed 200-m all-out and Nx200-m from low to all-out (controlled by a visual pacer), both with a respiratory valve system and a portable gas analyzer. Results: A paired Student’s t-test showed no statistical difference (p > .05) for all comparisons. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.97 and 0.98 for V_O2 in l/min and ml/kg/min, respectively; ICC = 0.75 to 0.9 for V_ CO2 (l/min and ml/kg/min), V_ E (in l/min) and HR (beats/min); ICC = 0.5 and 0.75 for %HRmax; and ICC < 0.5 for RER. Passing-Bablok regression showed that the dispersions were acceptable, considering the proportionality, except for HR and % HRmax. Bland-Altman method showed a high level of agreement for all variables. Conclusions: The _VO2peak and _VO2max, as well as the physiological variables _VCO2 and HR obtained, respectively, by 200-m and Nx200-m tests in swimmers with physical impairment were not different.
id RCAP_449917a6cb69203e9595ad36bae1966c
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/22374
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments?Incremental protocolParalympic swimming physiologyTime trial testValidationPeak and maximal oxygen uptake (V_O2peak and V_O2max, respectively) are used in assessing aerobic power. For swimmers with physical impairments, it is unclear whether the physiological variables obtained in 200-m and Nx200-m tests are similar. The objective of this study is to assess the validity of V_O2peak as an estimator of V_O2max and complementary physiological variables, in particular, carbon dioxide production (V_ CO2), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), minute-ventilation (V_ EÞ and absolute (HR) and relative (%HRmax) heart rates—which were obtained in a time trial test (200- m) and an incremental intermittent test (Nx200-m) performed by swimmers with physical impairments. Methods: Eleven well-trained swimmers with physical impairments performed 200-m all-out and Nx200-m from low to all-out (controlled by a visual pacer), both with a respiratory valve system and a portable gas analyzer. Results: A paired Student’s t-test showed no statistical difference (p > .05) for all comparisons. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.97 and 0.98 for V_O2 in l/min and ml/kg/min, respectively; ICC = 0.75 to 0.9 for V_ CO2 (l/min and ml/kg/min), V_ E (in l/min) and HR (beats/min); ICC = 0.5 and 0.75 for %HRmax; and ICC < 0.5 for RER. Passing-Bablok regression showed that the dispersions were acceptable, considering the proportionality, except for HR and % HRmax. Bland-Altman method showed a high level of agreement for all variables. Conclusions: The _VO2peak and _VO2max, as well as the physiological variables _VCO2 and HR obtained, respectively, by 200-m and Nx200-m tests in swimmers with physical impairment were not different.The study was approved by the local ethics committee (number 2.274.037) and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.The study was approved by the local ethics committee (number 2.274.037) and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of HelsinkiTaylor & FrancisBiblioteca Digital do IPBFeitosa, Wellington G.Barbosa, Tiago M.Correia, Ricardo de AssisCastro, Flávio A. de Souza2018-01-19T10:00:00Z20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10198/22374engFeitosa, Wellington G.; Barbosa, Tiago M.; Correia, Ricardo de A.; Castro, Flávio Antônio (2020). Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. ISSN 0270-1367. 91:2, p. 252-2620270-136710.1080/02701367.2019.1660758info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-21T10:50:08Zoai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/22374Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:13:36.373512Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments?
title Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments?
spellingShingle Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments?
Feitosa, Wellington G.
Incremental protocol
Paralympic swimming physiology
Time trial test
Validation
title_short Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments?
title_full Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments?
title_fullStr Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments?
title_full_unstemmed Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments?
title_sort Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments?
author Feitosa, Wellington G.
author_facet Feitosa, Wellington G.
Barbosa, Tiago M.
Correia, Ricardo de Assis
Castro, Flávio A. de Souza
author_role author
author2 Barbosa, Tiago M.
Correia, Ricardo de Assis
Castro, Flávio A. de Souza
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital do IPB
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Feitosa, Wellington G.
Barbosa, Tiago M.
Correia, Ricardo de Assis
Castro, Flávio A. de Souza
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Incremental protocol
Paralympic swimming physiology
Time trial test
Validation
topic Incremental protocol
Paralympic swimming physiology
Time trial test
Validation
description Peak and maximal oxygen uptake (V_O2peak and V_O2max, respectively) are used in assessing aerobic power. For swimmers with physical impairments, it is unclear whether the physiological variables obtained in 200-m and Nx200-m tests are similar. The objective of this study is to assess the validity of V_O2peak as an estimator of V_O2max and complementary physiological variables, in particular, carbon dioxide production (V_ CO2), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), minute-ventilation (V_ EÞ and absolute (HR) and relative (%HRmax) heart rates—which were obtained in a time trial test (200- m) and an incremental intermittent test (Nx200-m) performed by swimmers with physical impairments. Methods: Eleven well-trained swimmers with physical impairments performed 200-m all-out and Nx200-m from low to all-out (controlled by a visual pacer), both with a respiratory valve system and a portable gas analyzer. Results: A paired Student’s t-test showed no statistical difference (p > .05) for all comparisons. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.97 and 0.98 for V_O2 in l/min and ml/kg/min, respectively; ICC = 0.75 to 0.9 for V_ CO2 (l/min and ml/kg/min), V_ E (in l/min) and HR (beats/min); ICC = 0.5 and 0.75 for %HRmax; and ICC < 0.5 for RER. Passing-Bablok regression showed that the dispersions were acceptable, considering the proportionality, except for HR and % HRmax. Bland-Altman method showed a high level of agreement for all variables. Conclusions: The _VO2peak and _VO2max, as well as the physiological variables _VCO2 and HR obtained, respectively, by 200-m and Nx200-m tests in swimmers with physical impairment were not different.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-19T10:00:00Z
2020
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10198/22374
url http://hdl.handle.net/10198/22374
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Feitosa, Wellington G.; Barbosa, Tiago M.; Correia, Ricardo de A.; Castro, Flávio Antônio (2020). Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. ISSN 0270-1367. 91:2, p. 252-262
0270-1367
10.1080/02701367.2019.1660758
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135412580515840