Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10198/22374 |
Resumo: | Peak and maximal oxygen uptake (V_O2peak and V_O2max, respectively) are used in assessing aerobic power. For swimmers with physical impairments, it is unclear whether the physiological variables obtained in 200-m and Nx200-m tests are similar. The objective of this study is to assess the validity of V_O2peak as an estimator of V_O2max and complementary physiological variables, in particular, carbon dioxide production (V_ CO2), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), minute-ventilation (V_ EÞ and absolute (HR) and relative (%HRmax) heart rates—which were obtained in a time trial test (200- m) and an incremental intermittent test (Nx200-m) performed by swimmers with physical impairments. Methods: Eleven well-trained swimmers with physical impairments performed 200-m all-out and Nx200-m from low to all-out (controlled by a visual pacer), both with a respiratory valve system and a portable gas analyzer. Results: A paired Student’s t-test showed no statistical difference (p > .05) for all comparisons. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.97 and 0.98 for V_O2 in l/min and ml/kg/min, respectively; ICC = 0.75 to 0.9 for V_ CO2 (l/min and ml/kg/min), V_ E (in l/min) and HR (beats/min); ICC = 0.5 and 0.75 for %HRmax; and ICC < 0.5 for RER. Passing-Bablok regression showed that the dispersions were acceptable, considering the proportionality, except for HR and % HRmax. Bland-Altman method showed a high level of agreement for all variables. Conclusions: The _VO2peak and _VO2max, as well as the physiological variables _VCO2 and HR obtained, respectively, by 200-m and Nx200-m tests in swimmers with physical impairment were not different. |
id |
RCAP_449917a6cb69203e9595ad36bae1966c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/22374 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments?Incremental protocolParalympic swimming physiologyTime trial testValidationPeak and maximal oxygen uptake (V_O2peak and V_O2max, respectively) are used in assessing aerobic power. For swimmers with physical impairments, it is unclear whether the physiological variables obtained in 200-m and Nx200-m tests are similar. The objective of this study is to assess the validity of V_O2peak as an estimator of V_O2max and complementary physiological variables, in particular, carbon dioxide production (V_ CO2), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), minute-ventilation (V_ EÞ and absolute (HR) and relative (%HRmax) heart rates—which were obtained in a time trial test (200- m) and an incremental intermittent test (Nx200-m) performed by swimmers with physical impairments. Methods: Eleven well-trained swimmers with physical impairments performed 200-m all-out and Nx200-m from low to all-out (controlled by a visual pacer), both with a respiratory valve system and a portable gas analyzer. Results: A paired Student’s t-test showed no statistical difference (p > .05) for all comparisons. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.97 and 0.98 for V_O2 in l/min and ml/kg/min, respectively; ICC = 0.75 to 0.9 for V_ CO2 (l/min and ml/kg/min), V_ E (in l/min) and HR (beats/min); ICC = 0.5 and 0.75 for %HRmax; and ICC < 0.5 for RER. Passing-Bablok regression showed that the dispersions were acceptable, considering the proportionality, except for HR and % HRmax. Bland-Altman method showed a high level of agreement for all variables. Conclusions: The _VO2peak and _VO2max, as well as the physiological variables _VCO2 and HR obtained, respectively, by 200-m and Nx200-m tests in swimmers with physical impairment were not different.The study was approved by the local ethics committee (number 2.274.037) and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.The study was approved by the local ethics committee (number 2.274.037) and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of HelsinkiTaylor & FrancisBiblioteca Digital do IPBFeitosa, Wellington G.Barbosa, Tiago M.Correia, Ricardo de AssisCastro, Flávio A. de Souza2018-01-19T10:00:00Z20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10198/22374engFeitosa, Wellington G.; Barbosa, Tiago M.; Correia, Ricardo de A.; Castro, Flávio Antônio (2020). Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. ISSN 0270-1367. 91:2, p. 252-2620270-136710.1080/02701367.2019.1660758info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-21T10:50:08Zoai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/22374Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:13:36.373512Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments? |
title |
Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments? |
spellingShingle |
Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments? Feitosa, Wellington G. Incremental protocol Paralympic swimming physiology Time trial test Validation |
title_short |
Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments? |
title_full |
Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments? |
title_fullStr |
Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments? |
title_sort |
Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments? |
author |
Feitosa, Wellington G. |
author_facet |
Feitosa, Wellington G. Barbosa, Tiago M. Correia, Ricardo de Assis Castro, Flávio A. de Souza |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Barbosa, Tiago M. Correia, Ricardo de Assis Castro, Flávio A. de Souza |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital do IPB |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Feitosa, Wellington G. Barbosa, Tiago M. Correia, Ricardo de Assis Castro, Flávio A. de Souza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Incremental protocol Paralympic swimming physiology Time trial test Validation |
topic |
Incremental protocol Paralympic swimming physiology Time trial test Validation |
description |
Peak and maximal oxygen uptake (V_O2peak and V_O2max, respectively) are used in assessing aerobic power. For swimmers with physical impairments, it is unclear whether the physiological variables obtained in 200-m and Nx200-m tests are similar. The objective of this study is to assess the validity of V_O2peak as an estimator of V_O2max and complementary physiological variables, in particular, carbon dioxide production (V_ CO2), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), minute-ventilation (V_ EÞ and absolute (HR) and relative (%HRmax) heart rates—which were obtained in a time trial test (200- m) and an incremental intermittent test (Nx200-m) performed by swimmers with physical impairments. Methods: Eleven well-trained swimmers with physical impairments performed 200-m all-out and Nx200-m from low to all-out (controlled by a visual pacer), both with a respiratory valve system and a portable gas analyzer. Results: A paired Student’s t-test showed no statistical difference (p > .05) for all comparisons. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.97 and 0.98 for V_O2 in l/min and ml/kg/min, respectively; ICC = 0.75 to 0.9 for V_ CO2 (l/min and ml/kg/min), V_ E (in l/min) and HR (beats/min); ICC = 0.5 and 0.75 for %HRmax; and ICC < 0.5 for RER. Passing-Bablok regression showed that the dispersions were acceptable, considering the proportionality, except for HR and % HRmax. Bland-Altman method showed a high level of agreement for all variables. Conclusions: The _VO2peak and _VO2max, as well as the physiological variables _VCO2 and HR obtained, respectively, by 200-m and Nx200-m tests in swimmers with physical impairment were not different. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-19T10:00:00Z 2020 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10198/22374 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10198/22374 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Feitosa, Wellington G.; Barbosa, Tiago M.; Correia, Ricardo de A.; Castro, Flávio Antônio (2020). Is V̇O2peak a valid estimation of V̇O2max in swimmers with physical impairments? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. ISSN 0270-1367. 91:2, p. 252-262 0270-1367 10.1080/02701367.2019.1660758 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor & Francis |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor & Francis |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799135412580515840 |