Gender is not simply a matter of black and white, or is it?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Semin, G. R.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Palma, Tomás, Acarturk, Cengiz, Dziuba, Aleksandra
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/62654
Resumo: Based on research in physical anthropology, we argue that brightness marks the abstract category of gender, with light colours marking the female gender and dark colours marking the male gender. In a set of three experiments, we examine this hypothesis, first in a speeded gender classification experiment with male and female names presented in black and white. As expected, male names in black and female names in white are classified faster than the reverse gender-colour combinations. The second experiment relies on a gender classification task involving the disambiguation of very briefly appearing non-descript stimuli in the form of black and white ‘blobs’. The former are classified predominantly as male and the latter as female names. Finally, the processes driving light and dark object choices for males and females are examined by tracking the number of fixations and their duration in an eye-tracking experiment. The results reveal that when choosing for a male target, participants look longer and make more fixations on dark objects, and the same for light objects when choosing for a female target. The implications of these findings, which repeatedly reveal the same data patterns across experiments with Dutch, Portuguese and Turkish samples for the abstract category of gender, are discussed. The discussion attempts to enlarge the subject beyond mainstream models of embodied grounding. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain’.
id RCAP_44eac02111c22d1e337539ca7178f886
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/62654
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Gender is not simply a matter of black and white, or is it?Grounding genderColour and gender categorizationEye trackingDisambiguating amorphous stimuliBased on research in physical anthropology, we argue that brightness marks the abstract category of gender, with light colours marking the female gender and dark colours marking the male gender. In a set of three experiments, we examine this hypothesis, first in a speeded gender classification experiment with male and female names presented in black and white. As expected, male names in black and female names in white are classified faster than the reverse gender-colour combinations. The second experiment relies on a gender classification task involving the disambiguation of very briefly appearing non-descript stimuli in the form of black and white ‘blobs’. The former are classified predominantly as male and the latter as female names. Finally, the processes driving light and dark object choices for males and females are examined by tracking the number of fixations and their duration in an eye-tracking experiment. The results reveal that when choosing for a male target, participants look longer and make more fixations on dark objects, and the same for light objects when choosing for a female target. The implications of these findings, which repeatedly reveal the same data patterns across experiments with Dutch, Portuguese and Turkish samples for the abstract category of gender, are discussed. The discussion attempts to enlarge the subject beyond mainstream models of embodied grounding. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain’.The Royal SocietyRepositório da Universidade de LisboaSemin, G. R.Palma, TomásAcarturk, CengizDziuba, Aleksandra2024-02-15T16:58:42Z20182018-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/62654engSemin, G. R., Palma, T., Acartürk, C., & Dziuba, A. (2018). Gender is not simply a matter of black and white, or is it?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170126. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.01260962-843610.1098/rstb.2017.0126metadata only accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-19T01:18:33Zoai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/62654Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:38:52.354684Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Gender is not simply a matter of black and white, or is it?
title Gender is not simply a matter of black and white, or is it?
spellingShingle Gender is not simply a matter of black and white, or is it?
Semin, G. R.
Grounding gender
Colour and gender categorization
Eye tracking
Disambiguating amorphous stimuli
title_short Gender is not simply a matter of black and white, or is it?
title_full Gender is not simply a matter of black and white, or is it?
title_fullStr Gender is not simply a matter of black and white, or is it?
title_full_unstemmed Gender is not simply a matter of black and white, or is it?
title_sort Gender is not simply a matter of black and white, or is it?
author Semin, G. R.
author_facet Semin, G. R.
Palma, Tomás
Acarturk, Cengiz
Dziuba, Aleksandra
author_role author
author2 Palma, Tomás
Acarturk, Cengiz
Dziuba, Aleksandra
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Semin, G. R.
Palma, Tomás
Acarturk, Cengiz
Dziuba, Aleksandra
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Grounding gender
Colour and gender categorization
Eye tracking
Disambiguating amorphous stimuli
topic Grounding gender
Colour and gender categorization
Eye tracking
Disambiguating amorphous stimuli
description Based on research in physical anthropology, we argue that brightness marks the abstract category of gender, with light colours marking the female gender and dark colours marking the male gender. In a set of three experiments, we examine this hypothesis, first in a speeded gender classification experiment with male and female names presented in black and white. As expected, male names in black and female names in white are classified faster than the reverse gender-colour combinations. The second experiment relies on a gender classification task involving the disambiguation of very briefly appearing non-descript stimuli in the form of black and white ‘blobs’. The former are classified predominantly as male and the latter as female names. Finally, the processes driving light and dark object choices for males and females are examined by tracking the number of fixations and their duration in an eye-tracking experiment. The results reveal that when choosing for a male target, participants look longer and make more fixations on dark objects, and the same for light objects when choosing for a female target. The implications of these findings, which repeatedly reveal the same data patterns across experiments with Dutch, Portuguese and Turkish samples for the abstract category of gender, are discussed. The discussion attempts to enlarge the subject beyond mainstream models of embodied grounding. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain’.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
2024-02-15T16:58:42Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10451/62654
url http://hdl.handle.net/10451/62654
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Semin, G. R., Palma, T., Acartürk, C., & Dziuba, A. (2018). Gender is not simply a matter of black and white, or is it?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170126. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0126
0962-8436
10.1098/rstb.2017.0126
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv metadata only access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv metadata only access
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv The Royal Society
publisher.none.fl_str_mv The Royal Society
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137439232557056