EU Institutional Politics of Secrecy and Transparency in Foreign Affairs: A Commentary

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: O'Reilly, Emily
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i3.1162
Resumo: International diplomacy has long been regarded as the domain of an elite hand-picked few, instructed and groomed in something considered an art form. Both the secrecy and the pomp have their rational place. Political interventions from regime change through to more standard economic and social challenges cue both subtle and dramatic shifts in relationships and alignments and diplomats must rightly handle such situations with great delicacy. Premature or too much public disclosure about diplomatic exchanges could risk undermining the mutual trust and confidence on which the conduct of international relations and negotiations depends. The question of course concerns the determination of what constitutes ‘premature’ or ‘too much’ and who decides the point at which public access can or should occur. We have certainly seen a trend towards greater transparency in foreign affairs in recent times, but this will always remain one of the most sensitive areas for national governments and international organisations. Contributors to this publication pose important questions about transparency in the context of foreign affairs at EU level. The question ‘How much is enough?’ is particularly pertinent. I welcome the exploration of topics of secrecy and transparency in this thematic issue and look forward to further contributions as the theory and practice of the ideas put forward are developed.
id RCAP_44f7533e4dba58f4111b19c4e1ec91ce
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1162
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling EU Institutional Politics of Secrecy and Transparency in Foreign Affairs: A Commentaryaccess to information; diplomacy; EU foreign affairs; EU institutions; negotiations; secrecy; transparencyInternational diplomacy has long been regarded as the domain of an elite hand-picked few, instructed and groomed in something considered an art form. Both the secrecy and the pomp have their rational place. Political interventions from regime change through to more standard economic and social challenges cue both subtle and dramatic shifts in relationships and alignments and diplomats must rightly handle such situations with great delicacy. Premature or too much public disclosure about diplomatic exchanges could risk undermining the mutual trust and confidence on which the conduct of international relations and negotiations depends. The question of course concerns the determination of what constitutes ‘premature’ or ‘too much’ and who decides the point at which public access can or should occur. We have certainly seen a trend towards greater transparency in foreign affairs in recent times, but this will always remain one of the most sensitive areas for national governments and international organisations. Contributors to this publication pose important questions about transparency in the context of foreign affairs at EU level. The question ‘How much is enough?’ is particularly pertinent. I welcome the exploration of topics of secrecy and transparency in this thematic issue and look forward to further contributions as the theory and practice of the ideas put forward are developed.Cogitatio2017-09-25info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i3.1162oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1162Politics and Governance; Vol 5, No 3 (2017): EU Institutional Politics of Secrecy and Transparency in Foreign Affairs; 91-932183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1162https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i3.1162https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1162/1162Copyright (c) 2017 Emily O'Reillyhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessO'Reilly, Emily2022-12-22T15:15:41Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1162Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:11.941929Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv EU Institutional Politics of Secrecy and Transparency in Foreign Affairs: A Commentary
title EU Institutional Politics of Secrecy and Transparency in Foreign Affairs: A Commentary
spellingShingle EU Institutional Politics of Secrecy and Transparency in Foreign Affairs: A Commentary
O'Reilly, Emily
access to information; diplomacy; EU foreign affairs; EU institutions; negotiations; secrecy; transparency
title_short EU Institutional Politics of Secrecy and Transparency in Foreign Affairs: A Commentary
title_full EU Institutional Politics of Secrecy and Transparency in Foreign Affairs: A Commentary
title_fullStr EU Institutional Politics of Secrecy and Transparency in Foreign Affairs: A Commentary
title_full_unstemmed EU Institutional Politics of Secrecy and Transparency in Foreign Affairs: A Commentary
title_sort EU Institutional Politics of Secrecy and Transparency in Foreign Affairs: A Commentary
author O'Reilly, Emily
author_facet O'Reilly, Emily
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv O'Reilly, Emily
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv access to information; diplomacy; EU foreign affairs; EU institutions; negotiations; secrecy; transparency
topic access to information; diplomacy; EU foreign affairs; EU institutions; negotiations; secrecy; transparency
description International diplomacy has long been regarded as the domain of an elite hand-picked few, instructed and groomed in something considered an art form. Both the secrecy and the pomp have their rational place. Political interventions from regime change through to more standard economic and social challenges cue both subtle and dramatic shifts in relationships and alignments and diplomats must rightly handle such situations with great delicacy. Premature or too much public disclosure about diplomatic exchanges could risk undermining the mutual trust and confidence on which the conduct of international relations and negotiations depends. The question of course concerns the determination of what constitutes ‘premature’ or ‘too much’ and who decides the point at which public access can or should occur. We have certainly seen a trend towards greater transparency in foreign affairs in recent times, but this will always remain one of the most sensitive areas for national governments and international organisations. Contributors to this publication pose important questions about transparency in the context of foreign affairs at EU level. The question ‘How much is enough?’ is particularly pertinent. I welcome the exploration of topics of secrecy and transparency in this thematic issue and look forward to further contributions as the theory and practice of the ideas put forward are developed.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09-25
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i3.1162
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1162
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i3.1162
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1162
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1162
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i3.1162
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1162/1162
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Emily O'Reilly
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Emily O'Reilly
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 5, No 3 (2017): EU Institutional Politics of Secrecy and Transparency in Foreign Affairs; 91-93
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130668041502720