Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of a road-safety barrier produced using recycled tire rubber
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/21929 |
Resumo: | Increasing end-of-life material recovery and its application in new products is essential to reduce resource consumption. This paper assesses the cradle-to-gate life cycle energy and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of a new road safety barrier product to be installed around guardrails’ poles. To analyze the potential life cycle benefit of incorporating recycled materials, a base case product A, produced with conventional virgin synthetic rubber and polypropylene (PP), was compared with two equivalent alternatives under study: B (using recycled end-of-life tire rubber granulate (TRG) and PP), and C (using TRG and recycled polypropylene). The results show that the incorporation of recycled TRG has a positive effect in primary energy and carbon emissions. Product B presents less 38% CO2 emissions and 47% non-renewable primary energy than product A. The combination of TRG and recycled polypropylene (C), presents even more benefits: less 69% CO2 and 86% nonrenewable primary energy than A. Supply chain processes and material production have much higher impacts than the product manufacturing (e.g. product molding only represents 5% of the primary energy of product A). To conclude, recycled materials incorporation should be strongly encouraged since it has a great potential to reduce current carbon emissions and primary energy of products. |
id |
RCAP_451b78b33726383995ab0471ed26012a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/21929 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of a road-safety barrier produced using recycled tire rubberCircular economyLCAPrimary energyRecyclingSecondary materialTire rubberIncreasing end-of-life material recovery and its application in new products is essential to reduce resource consumption. This paper assesses the cradle-to-gate life cycle energy and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of a new road safety barrier product to be installed around guardrails’ poles. To analyze the potential life cycle benefit of incorporating recycled materials, a base case product A, produced with conventional virgin synthetic rubber and polypropylene (PP), was compared with two equivalent alternatives under study: B (using recycled end-of-life tire rubber granulate (TRG) and PP), and C (using TRG and recycled polypropylene). The results show that the incorporation of recycled TRG has a positive effect in primary energy and carbon emissions. Product B presents less 38% CO2 emissions and 47% non-renewable primary energy than product A. The combination of TRG and recycled polypropylene (C), presents even more benefits: less 69% CO2 and 86% nonrenewable primary energy than A. Supply chain processes and material production have much higher impacts than the product manufacturing (e.g. product molding only represents 5% of the primary energy of product A). To conclude, recycled materials incorporation should be strongly encouraged since it has a great potential to reduce current carbon emissions and primary energy of products.This research was funded by: European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement “No. 810764”; FEDER, through the Portugal-2020 program (PT2020) by the Regional Operational Program of Lisbon (LISBOA-01-0247-FEDER-038326) - project n◦ 038326 – “Safety4Road – Application of hybrid ecological materials to improve road safety”; project Base Funding – UIDB/04730/2020 of the Center for Innovation in Engineering and Industrial Technology – CIETI, Portugal; LA/P/0045/2020 (ALiCE) and UIDB/00511/2020 - UIDP/00511/2020 (LEPABE) funded by national funds through FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC).ElsevierRepositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do PortoMonteiro, H.Ribeiro, I.Gonçalves, M.Iten, M.Caetano, Nídia S.2023-01-27T09:33:22Z2022-02-022022-02-02T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/21929eng10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.038info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-13T13:18:17Zoai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/21929Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:42:01.823939Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of a road-safety barrier produced using recycled tire rubber |
title |
Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of a road-safety barrier produced using recycled tire rubber |
spellingShingle |
Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of a road-safety barrier produced using recycled tire rubber Monteiro, H. Circular economy LCA Primary energy Recycling Secondary material Tire rubber |
title_short |
Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of a road-safety barrier produced using recycled tire rubber |
title_full |
Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of a road-safety barrier produced using recycled tire rubber |
title_fullStr |
Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of a road-safety barrier produced using recycled tire rubber |
title_full_unstemmed |
Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of a road-safety barrier produced using recycled tire rubber |
title_sort |
Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of a road-safety barrier produced using recycled tire rubber |
author |
Monteiro, H. |
author_facet |
Monteiro, H. Ribeiro, I. Gonçalves, M. Iten, M. Caetano, Nídia S. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ribeiro, I. Gonçalves, M. Iten, M. Caetano, Nídia S. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do Porto |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Monteiro, H. Ribeiro, I. Gonçalves, M. Iten, M. Caetano, Nídia S. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Circular economy LCA Primary energy Recycling Secondary material Tire rubber |
topic |
Circular economy LCA Primary energy Recycling Secondary material Tire rubber |
description |
Increasing end-of-life material recovery and its application in new products is essential to reduce resource consumption. This paper assesses the cradle-to-gate life cycle energy and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of a new road safety barrier product to be installed around guardrails’ poles. To analyze the potential life cycle benefit of incorporating recycled materials, a base case product A, produced with conventional virgin synthetic rubber and polypropylene (PP), was compared with two equivalent alternatives under study: B (using recycled end-of-life tire rubber granulate (TRG) and PP), and C (using TRG and recycled polypropylene). The results show that the incorporation of recycled TRG has a positive effect in primary energy and carbon emissions. Product B presents less 38% CO2 emissions and 47% non-renewable primary energy than product A. The combination of TRG and recycled polypropylene (C), presents even more benefits: less 69% CO2 and 86% nonrenewable primary energy than A. Supply chain processes and material production have much higher impacts than the product manufacturing (e.g. product molding only represents 5% of the primary energy of product A). To conclude, recycled materials incorporation should be strongly encouraged since it has a great potential to reduce current carbon emissions and primary energy of products. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-02 2022-02-02T00:00:00Z 2023-01-27T09:33:22Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/21929 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/21929 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.038 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131507095240704 |