Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of a road-safety barrier produced using recycled tire rubber

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Monteiro, H.
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Ribeiro, I., Gonçalves, M., Iten, M., Caetano, Nídia S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/21929
Resumo: Increasing end-of-life material recovery and its application in new products is essential to reduce resource consumption. This paper assesses the cradle-to-gate life cycle energy and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of a new road safety barrier product to be installed around guardrails’ poles. To analyze the potential life cycle benefit of incorporating recycled materials, a base case product A, produced with conventional virgin synthetic rubber and polypropylene (PP), was compared with two equivalent alternatives under study: B (using recycled end-of-life tire rubber granulate (TRG) and PP), and C (using TRG and recycled polypropylene). The results show that the incorporation of recycled TRG has a positive effect in primary energy and carbon emissions. Product B presents less 38% CO2 emissions and 47% non-renewable primary energy than product A. The combination of TRG and recycled polypropylene (C), presents even more benefits: less 69% CO2 and 86% nonrenewable primary energy than A. Supply chain processes and material production have much higher impacts than the product manufacturing (e.g. product molding only represents 5% of the primary energy of product A). To conclude, recycled materials incorporation should be strongly encouraged since it has a great potential to reduce current carbon emissions and primary energy of products.
id RCAP_451b78b33726383995ab0471ed26012a
oai_identifier_str oai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/21929
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of a road-safety barrier produced using recycled tire rubberCircular economyLCAPrimary energyRecyclingSecondary materialTire rubberIncreasing end-of-life material recovery and its application in new products is essential to reduce resource consumption. This paper assesses the cradle-to-gate life cycle energy and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of a new road safety barrier product to be installed around guardrails’ poles. To analyze the potential life cycle benefit of incorporating recycled materials, a base case product A, produced with conventional virgin synthetic rubber and polypropylene (PP), was compared with two equivalent alternatives under study: B (using recycled end-of-life tire rubber granulate (TRG) and PP), and C (using TRG and recycled polypropylene). The results show that the incorporation of recycled TRG has a positive effect in primary energy and carbon emissions. Product B presents less 38% CO2 emissions and 47% non-renewable primary energy than product A. The combination of TRG and recycled polypropylene (C), presents even more benefits: less 69% CO2 and 86% nonrenewable primary energy than A. Supply chain processes and material production have much higher impacts than the product manufacturing (e.g. product molding only represents 5% of the primary energy of product A). To conclude, recycled materials incorporation should be strongly encouraged since it has a great potential to reduce current carbon emissions and primary energy of products.This research was funded by: European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement “No. 810764”; FEDER, through the Portugal-2020 program (PT2020) by the Regional Operational Program of Lisbon (LISBOA-01-0247-FEDER-038326) - project n◦ 038326 – “Safety4Road – Application of hybrid ecological materials to improve road safety”; project Base Funding – UIDB/04730/2020 of the Center for Innovation in Engineering and Industrial Technology – CIETI, Portugal; LA/P/0045/2020 (ALiCE) and UIDB/00511/2020 - UIDP/00511/2020 (LEPABE) funded by national funds through FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC).ElsevierRepositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do PortoMonteiro, H.Ribeiro, I.Gonçalves, M.Iten, M.Caetano, Nídia S.2023-01-27T09:33:22Z2022-02-022022-02-02T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/21929eng10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.038info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-13T13:18:17Zoai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/21929Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:42:01.823939Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of a road-safety barrier produced using recycled tire rubber
title Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of a road-safety barrier produced using recycled tire rubber
spellingShingle Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of a road-safety barrier produced using recycled tire rubber
Monteiro, H.
Circular economy
LCA
Primary energy
Recycling
Secondary material
Tire rubber
title_short Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of a road-safety barrier produced using recycled tire rubber
title_full Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of a road-safety barrier produced using recycled tire rubber
title_fullStr Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of a road-safety barrier produced using recycled tire rubber
title_full_unstemmed Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of a road-safety barrier produced using recycled tire rubber
title_sort Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of a road-safety barrier produced using recycled tire rubber
author Monteiro, H.
author_facet Monteiro, H.
Ribeiro, I.
Gonçalves, M.
Iten, M.
Caetano, Nídia S.
author_role author
author2 Ribeiro, I.
Gonçalves, M.
Iten, M.
Caetano, Nídia S.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do Porto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Monteiro, H.
Ribeiro, I.
Gonçalves, M.
Iten, M.
Caetano, Nídia S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Circular economy
LCA
Primary energy
Recycling
Secondary material
Tire rubber
topic Circular economy
LCA
Primary energy
Recycling
Secondary material
Tire rubber
description Increasing end-of-life material recovery and its application in new products is essential to reduce resource consumption. This paper assesses the cradle-to-gate life cycle energy and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of a new road safety barrier product to be installed around guardrails’ poles. To analyze the potential life cycle benefit of incorporating recycled materials, a base case product A, produced with conventional virgin synthetic rubber and polypropylene (PP), was compared with two equivalent alternatives under study: B (using recycled end-of-life tire rubber granulate (TRG) and PP), and C (using TRG and recycled polypropylene). The results show that the incorporation of recycled TRG has a positive effect in primary energy and carbon emissions. Product B presents less 38% CO2 emissions and 47% non-renewable primary energy than product A. The combination of TRG and recycled polypropylene (C), presents even more benefits: less 69% CO2 and 86% nonrenewable primary energy than A. Supply chain processes and material production have much higher impacts than the product manufacturing (e.g. product molding only represents 5% of the primary energy of product A). To conclude, recycled materials incorporation should be strongly encouraged since it has a great potential to reduce current carbon emissions and primary energy of products.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-02
2022-02-02T00:00:00Z
2023-01-27T09:33:22Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/21929
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/21929
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.038
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131507095240704