Baumgarten's Meditationes as a Commentary on Horace's Ars Poetica
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10451/25536 |
Resumo: | In his first work, the poetics Meditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poema pertinentibus, Baumgarten frequently cites Horace’s Ars Poetica. Horace was highly esteemed by Baumgarten and his contemporaries, especially in the fields of poetics and art theory. Baumgarten uses Ars Poetica throughout Meditationes, but it is especially in the paragraphs introducing some of the key concepts of his philosophy that there is a significant amount of excerpts from Horace’s poetics. In this article, I examine if and how contemporary scholarly interpretations may have influenced these uses of Horace’s text and maybe even Baumgarten’s theory. Following a brief account of relevant commentaries as well as Horace’s position in contemporary art theory, I explore the implied interpretations of Ars Poetica in Baumgarten’s excerpts, focusing on his three key terms, phantasia, heterocosmica and methodum lucidam. Compared to the conception of Horace as expressed in the commentaries, this study suggests a complex interaction between those and Baumgarten’s art theory. |
id |
RCAP_456a38690a29bc9e9012f01396c28b12 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/25536 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Baumgarten's Meditationes as a Commentary on Horace's Ars PoeticaHoraceArt theoryPhantasiaHeterocosmicaMethodum lucidamBaumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb, 1714-1762In his first work, the poetics Meditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poema pertinentibus, Baumgarten frequently cites Horace’s Ars Poetica. Horace was highly esteemed by Baumgarten and his contemporaries, especially in the fields of poetics and art theory. Baumgarten uses Ars Poetica throughout Meditationes, but it is especially in the paragraphs introducing some of the key concepts of his philosophy that there is a significant amount of excerpts from Horace’s poetics. In this article, I examine if and how contemporary scholarly interpretations may have influenced these uses of Horace’s text and maybe even Baumgarten’s theory. Following a brief account of relevant commentaries as well as Horace’s position in contemporary art theory, I explore the implied interpretations of Ars Poetica in Baumgarten’s excerpts, focusing on his three key terms, phantasia, heterocosmica and methodum lucidam. Compared to the conception of Horace as expressed in the commentaries, this study suggests a complex interaction between those and Baumgarten’s art theory.Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa / ColibriRepositório da Universidade de LisboaThorsen, Bengerd Juul2016-12-29T11:44:41Z2014-112014-11-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/25536eng0872-4784info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-08T16:15:08Zoai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/25536Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:42:26.128032Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Baumgarten's Meditationes as a Commentary on Horace's Ars Poetica |
title |
Baumgarten's Meditationes as a Commentary on Horace's Ars Poetica |
spellingShingle |
Baumgarten's Meditationes as a Commentary on Horace's Ars Poetica Thorsen, Bengerd Juul Horace Art theory Phantasia Heterocosmica Methodum lucidam Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb, 1714-1762 |
title_short |
Baumgarten's Meditationes as a Commentary on Horace's Ars Poetica |
title_full |
Baumgarten's Meditationes as a Commentary on Horace's Ars Poetica |
title_fullStr |
Baumgarten's Meditationes as a Commentary on Horace's Ars Poetica |
title_full_unstemmed |
Baumgarten's Meditationes as a Commentary on Horace's Ars Poetica |
title_sort |
Baumgarten's Meditationes as a Commentary on Horace's Ars Poetica |
author |
Thorsen, Bengerd Juul |
author_facet |
Thorsen, Bengerd Juul |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Thorsen, Bengerd Juul |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Horace Art theory Phantasia Heterocosmica Methodum lucidam Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb, 1714-1762 |
topic |
Horace Art theory Phantasia Heterocosmica Methodum lucidam Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb, 1714-1762 |
description |
In his first work, the poetics Meditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poema pertinentibus, Baumgarten frequently cites Horace’s Ars Poetica. Horace was highly esteemed by Baumgarten and his contemporaries, especially in the fields of poetics and art theory. Baumgarten uses Ars Poetica throughout Meditationes, but it is especially in the paragraphs introducing some of the key concepts of his philosophy that there is a significant amount of excerpts from Horace’s poetics. In this article, I examine if and how contemporary scholarly interpretations may have influenced these uses of Horace’s text and maybe even Baumgarten’s theory. Following a brief account of relevant commentaries as well as Horace’s position in contemporary art theory, I explore the implied interpretations of Ars Poetica in Baumgarten’s excerpts, focusing on his three key terms, phantasia, heterocosmica and methodum lucidam. Compared to the conception of Horace as expressed in the commentaries, this study suggests a complex interaction between those and Baumgarten’s art theory. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-11 2014-11-01T00:00:00Z 2016-12-29T11:44:41Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/25536 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/25536 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0872-4784 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa / Colibri |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa / Colibri |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134338962423808 |