Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10316/95471 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147698 |
Resumo: | Microplastics (< 5 mm in size) are known to be widespread in the marine environment but are still poorly studied in Polar Regions, particularly in the Antarctic. As penguins have a wide distribution around Antarctica, three congeneric species: Adélie (Pygoscelis adeliae), chinstrap (Pygoscelis antarcticus) and gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) were selected to evaluate the occurrence of microplastics across the Antarctic Peninsula and Scotia Sea. Scat samples (used as a proxy of ingestion), were collected from breeding colonies over seven seasons between 2006 and 2016. Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), present in scat samples, contributed 85%, 66% and 54% of the diet in terms of frequency of occurrence to the diet of Adélie, gentoo and chinstrap penguins, respectively. Microplastics were found in 15%, 28% and 29% scats of Adélie, chinstrap and gentoo penguin respectively. A total of 92 particles were extracted from the scats (n = 317) and 32% (n = 29) were chemically identified via micro-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (μ-FTIR). From all the particles extracted, 35% were identified as microplastics, particularly polyethylene (80%) and polyester (10%). It was not possible to ascertain the identification of the remaining 10% of samples. Other anthropogenic particles were identified in 55% of samples, identified as cellulose fibres. The results show a similar frequency of occurrence of particles across all colonies, suggesting there is no particular point source for microplastic pollution in the Scotia Sea. Additionally, no clear temporal variation in the number of microplastics in penguins was observed. Overall, this study reveals the presence of microplastics across Antarctica, in three penguin species and offers evidence of other anthropogenic particles in high numbers. Further research is needed to better understand the spatio-temporal dynamics, fate and effect of microplastics on these ecosystems, and improve plastic pollution policies in Antarctica. |
id |
RCAP_45b394e922f68c55fcb2122391a73dc0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/95471 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplersAntarctic PeninsulaAntarctic top predatorsCelluloseMicroplasticsPlastic pollutionScotia SeaAnimalsAntarctic RegionsEcosystemMicroplasticsPlasticsSpheniscidaeMicroplastics (< 5 mm in size) are known to be widespread in the marine environment but are still poorly studied in Polar Regions, particularly in the Antarctic. As penguins have a wide distribution around Antarctica, three congeneric species: Adélie (Pygoscelis adeliae), chinstrap (Pygoscelis antarcticus) and gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) were selected to evaluate the occurrence of microplastics across the Antarctic Peninsula and Scotia Sea. Scat samples (used as a proxy of ingestion), were collected from breeding colonies over seven seasons between 2006 and 2016. Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), present in scat samples, contributed 85%, 66% and 54% of the diet in terms of frequency of occurrence to the diet of Adélie, gentoo and chinstrap penguins, respectively. Microplastics were found in 15%, 28% and 29% scats of Adélie, chinstrap and gentoo penguin respectively. A total of 92 particles were extracted from the scats (n = 317) and 32% (n = 29) were chemically identified via micro-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (μ-FTIR). From all the particles extracted, 35% were identified as microplastics, particularly polyethylene (80%) and polyester (10%). It was not possible to ascertain the identification of the remaining 10% of samples. Other anthropogenic particles were identified in 55% of samples, identified as cellulose fibres. The results show a similar frequency of occurrence of particles across all colonies, suggesting there is no particular point source for microplastic pollution in the Scotia Sea. Additionally, no clear temporal variation in the number of microplastics in penguins was observed. Overall, this study reveals the presence of microplastics across Antarctica, in three penguin species and offers evidence of other anthropogenic particles in high numbers. Further research is needed to better understand the spatio-temporal dynamics, fate and effect of microplastics on these ecosystems, and improve plastic pollution policies in Antarctica.Elsevier2021-09-202023-09-20T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/95471http://hdl.handle.net/10316/95471https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147698eng00489697https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969721027698#f0005Fragão, JoanaBessa, FilipaOtero, VanessaBarbosa, AndrésSobral, PaulaWaluda, Claire M.Guímaro, Hugo R.Xavier, José C.info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-10-27T11:01:25Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/95471Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:13:57.680279Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers |
title |
Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers |
spellingShingle |
Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers Fragão, Joana Antarctic Peninsula Antarctic top predators Cellulose Microplastics Plastic pollution Scotia Sea Animals Antarctic Regions Ecosystem Microplastics Plastics Spheniscidae |
title_short |
Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers |
title_full |
Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers |
title_fullStr |
Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers |
title_sort |
Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers |
author |
Fragão, Joana |
author_facet |
Fragão, Joana Bessa, Filipa Otero, Vanessa Barbosa, Andrés Sobral, Paula Waluda, Claire M. Guímaro, Hugo R. Xavier, José C. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bessa, Filipa Otero, Vanessa Barbosa, Andrés Sobral, Paula Waluda, Claire M. Guímaro, Hugo R. Xavier, José C. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fragão, Joana Bessa, Filipa Otero, Vanessa Barbosa, Andrés Sobral, Paula Waluda, Claire M. Guímaro, Hugo R. Xavier, José C. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Antarctic Peninsula Antarctic top predators Cellulose Microplastics Plastic pollution Scotia Sea Animals Antarctic Regions Ecosystem Microplastics Plastics Spheniscidae |
topic |
Antarctic Peninsula Antarctic top predators Cellulose Microplastics Plastic pollution Scotia Sea Animals Antarctic Regions Ecosystem Microplastics Plastics Spheniscidae |
description |
Microplastics (< 5 mm in size) are known to be widespread in the marine environment but are still poorly studied in Polar Regions, particularly in the Antarctic. As penguins have a wide distribution around Antarctica, three congeneric species: Adélie (Pygoscelis adeliae), chinstrap (Pygoscelis antarcticus) and gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) were selected to evaluate the occurrence of microplastics across the Antarctic Peninsula and Scotia Sea. Scat samples (used as a proxy of ingestion), were collected from breeding colonies over seven seasons between 2006 and 2016. Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), present in scat samples, contributed 85%, 66% and 54% of the diet in terms of frequency of occurrence to the diet of Adélie, gentoo and chinstrap penguins, respectively. Microplastics were found in 15%, 28% and 29% scats of Adélie, chinstrap and gentoo penguin respectively. A total of 92 particles were extracted from the scats (n = 317) and 32% (n = 29) were chemically identified via micro-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (μ-FTIR). From all the particles extracted, 35% were identified as microplastics, particularly polyethylene (80%) and polyester (10%). It was not possible to ascertain the identification of the remaining 10% of samples. Other anthropogenic particles were identified in 55% of samples, identified as cellulose fibres. The results show a similar frequency of occurrence of particles across all colonies, suggesting there is no particular point source for microplastic pollution in the Scotia Sea. Additionally, no clear temporal variation in the number of microplastics in penguins was observed. Overall, this study reveals the presence of microplastics across Antarctica, in three penguin species and offers evidence of other anthropogenic particles in high numbers. Further research is needed to better understand the spatio-temporal dynamics, fate and effect of microplastics on these ecosystems, and improve plastic pollution policies in Antarctica. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-20 2023-09-20T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/95471 http://hdl.handle.net/10316/95471 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147698 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/95471 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147698 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
00489697 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969721027698#f0005 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
embargoedAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134036811055104 |