Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fragão, Joana
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Bessa, Filipa, Otero, Vanessa, Barbosa, Andrés, Sobral, Paula, Waluda, Claire M., Guímaro, Hugo R., Xavier, José C.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/95471
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147698
Resumo: Microplastics (< 5 mm in size) are known to be widespread in the marine environment but are still poorly studied in Polar Regions, particularly in the Antarctic. As penguins have a wide distribution around Antarctica, three congeneric species: Adélie (Pygoscelis adeliae), chinstrap (Pygoscelis antarcticus) and gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) were selected to evaluate the occurrence of microplastics across the Antarctic Peninsula and Scotia Sea. Scat samples (used as a proxy of ingestion), were collected from breeding colonies over seven seasons between 2006 and 2016. Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), present in scat samples, contributed 85%, 66% and 54% of the diet in terms of frequency of occurrence to the diet of Adélie, gentoo and chinstrap penguins, respectively. Microplastics were found in 15%, 28% and 29% scats of Adélie, chinstrap and gentoo penguin respectively. A total of 92 particles were extracted from the scats (n = 317) and 32% (n = 29) were chemically identified via micro-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (μ-FTIR). From all the particles extracted, 35% were identified as microplastics, particularly polyethylene (80%) and polyester (10%). It was not possible to ascertain the identification of the remaining 10% of samples. Other anthropogenic particles were identified in 55% of samples, identified as cellulose fibres. The results show a similar frequency of occurrence of particles across all colonies, suggesting there is no particular point source for microplastic pollution in the Scotia Sea. Additionally, no clear temporal variation in the number of microplastics in penguins was observed. Overall, this study reveals the presence of microplastics across Antarctica, in three penguin species and offers evidence of other anthropogenic particles in high numbers. Further research is needed to better understand the spatio-temporal dynamics, fate and effect of microplastics on these ecosystems, and improve plastic pollution policies in Antarctica.
id RCAP_45b394e922f68c55fcb2122391a73dc0
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/95471
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplersAntarctic PeninsulaAntarctic top predatorsCelluloseMicroplasticsPlastic pollutionScotia SeaAnimalsAntarctic RegionsEcosystemMicroplasticsPlasticsSpheniscidaeMicroplastics (< 5 mm in size) are known to be widespread in the marine environment but are still poorly studied in Polar Regions, particularly in the Antarctic. As penguins have a wide distribution around Antarctica, three congeneric species: Adélie (Pygoscelis adeliae), chinstrap (Pygoscelis antarcticus) and gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) were selected to evaluate the occurrence of microplastics across the Antarctic Peninsula and Scotia Sea. Scat samples (used as a proxy of ingestion), were collected from breeding colonies over seven seasons between 2006 and 2016. Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), present in scat samples, contributed 85%, 66% and 54% of the diet in terms of frequency of occurrence to the diet of Adélie, gentoo and chinstrap penguins, respectively. Microplastics were found in 15%, 28% and 29% scats of Adélie, chinstrap and gentoo penguin respectively. A total of 92 particles were extracted from the scats (n = 317) and 32% (n = 29) were chemically identified via micro-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (μ-FTIR). From all the particles extracted, 35% were identified as microplastics, particularly polyethylene (80%) and polyester (10%). It was not possible to ascertain the identification of the remaining 10% of samples. Other anthropogenic particles were identified in 55% of samples, identified as cellulose fibres. The results show a similar frequency of occurrence of particles across all colonies, suggesting there is no particular point source for microplastic pollution in the Scotia Sea. Additionally, no clear temporal variation in the number of microplastics in penguins was observed. Overall, this study reveals the presence of microplastics across Antarctica, in three penguin species and offers evidence of other anthropogenic particles in high numbers. Further research is needed to better understand the spatio-temporal dynamics, fate and effect of microplastics on these ecosystems, and improve plastic pollution policies in Antarctica.Elsevier2021-09-202023-09-20T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/95471http://hdl.handle.net/10316/95471https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147698eng00489697https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969721027698#f0005Fragão, JoanaBessa, FilipaOtero, VanessaBarbosa, AndrésSobral, PaulaWaluda, Claire M.Guímaro, Hugo R.Xavier, José C.info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-10-27T11:01:25Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/95471Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:13:57.680279Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers
title Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers
spellingShingle Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers
Fragão, Joana
Antarctic Peninsula
Antarctic top predators
Cellulose
Microplastics
Plastic pollution
Scotia Sea
Animals
Antarctic Regions
Ecosystem
Microplastics
Plastics
Spheniscidae
title_short Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers
title_full Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers
title_fullStr Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers
title_full_unstemmed Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers
title_sort Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers
author Fragão, Joana
author_facet Fragão, Joana
Bessa, Filipa
Otero, Vanessa
Barbosa, Andrés
Sobral, Paula
Waluda, Claire M.
Guímaro, Hugo R.
Xavier, José C.
author_role author
author2 Bessa, Filipa
Otero, Vanessa
Barbosa, Andrés
Sobral, Paula
Waluda, Claire M.
Guímaro, Hugo R.
Xavier, José C.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fragão, Joana
Bessa, Filipa
Otero, Vanessa
Barbosa, Andrés
Sobral, Paula
Waluda, Claire M.
Guímaro, Hugo R.
Xavier, José C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Antarctic Peninsula
Antarctic top predators
Cellulose
Microplastics
Plastic pollution
Scotia Sea
Animals
Antarctic Regions
Ecosystem
Microplastics
Plastics
Spheniscidae
topic Antarctic Peninsula
Antarctic top predators
Cellulose
Microplastics
Plastic pollution
Scotia Sea
Animals
Antarctic Regions
Ecosystem
Microplastics
Plastics
Spheniscidae
description Microplastics (< 5 mm in size) are known to be widespread in the marine environment but are still poorly studied in Polar Regions, particularly in the Antarctic. As penguins have a wide distribution around Antarctica, three congeneric species: Adélie (Pygoscelis adeliae), chinstrap (Pygoscelis antarcticus) and gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) were selected to evaluate the occurrence of microplastics across the Antarctic Peninsula and Scotia Sea. Scat samples (used as a proxy of ingestion), were collected from breeding colonies over seven seasons between 2006 and 2016. Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), present in scat samples, contributed 85%, 66% and 54% of the diet in terms of frequency of occurrence to the diet of Adélie, gentoo and chinstrap penguins, respectively. Microplastics were found in 15%, 28% and 29% scats of Adélie, chinstrap and gentoo penguin respectively. A total of 92 particles were extracted from the scats (n = 317) and 32% (n = 29) were chemically identified via micro-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (μ-FTIR). From all the particles extracted, 35% were identified as microplastics, particularly polyethylene (80%) and polyester (10%). It was not possible to ascertain the identification of the remaining 10% of samples. Other anthropogenic particles were identified in 55% of samples, identified as cellulose fibres. The results show a similar frequency of occurrence of particles across all colonies, suggesting there is no particular point source for microplastic pollution in the Scotia Sea. Additionally, no clear temporal variation in the number of microplastics in penguins was observed. Overall, this study reveals the presence of microplastics across Antarctica, in three penguin species and offers evidence of other anthropogenic particles in high numbers. Further research is needed to better understand the spatio-temporal dynamics, fate and effect of microplastics on these ecosystems, and improve plastic pollution policies in Antarctica.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-20
2023-09-20T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/95471
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/95471
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147698
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/95471
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147698
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 00489697
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969721027698#f0005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134036811055104