Eye-movements in implicit artificial grammar learning
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/13006 |
Resumo: | Artificial grammar learning (AGL) has been probed with forced-choice behavioral tests (active tests). Recent attempts to probe the outcomes of learning (implicitly acquired knowledge) with eye-movement responses (passive tests) have shown null results. However, these latter studies have not tested for sensitivity effects, for example, increased eye movements on a printed violation. In this study, we tested for sensitivity effects in AGL tests with (Experiment 1) and without (Experiment 2) concurrent active tests (preference- and grammaticality classification) in an eye-tracking experiment. Eye movements discriminated between sequence types in passive tests and more so in active tests. The eye-movement profile did not differ between preference and grammaticality classification, and it resembled sensitivity effects commonly observed in natural syntax processing. Our findings show that the outcomes of implicit structured sequence learning can be characterized in eye tracking. More specifically, whole trial measures (dwell time, number of fixations) showed robust AGL effects, whereas first-pass measures (first-fixation duration) did not. Furthermore, our findings strengthen the link between artificial and natural syntax processing, and they shed light on the factors that determine performance differences in preference and grammaticality classification tests. |
id |
RCAP_4686237e9fe51c7fff91aa1c64371392 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/13006 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Eye-movements in implicit artificial grammar learningSyntactic structureBrain potentialsMemoryLanguageGrammaticalityMechanismsContributeMonkeysSystemsMacaqueEye-trackingImplicit learningArtificial grammar learningSyntactic processingPreference classificationArtificial grammar learning (AGL) has been probed with forced-choice behavioral tests (active tests). Recent attempts to probe the outcomes of learning (implicitly acquired knowledge) with eye-movement responses (passive tests) have shown null results. However, these latter studies have not tested for sensitivity effects, for example, increased eye movements on a printed violation. In this study, we tested for sensitivity effects in AGL tests with (Experiment 1) and without (Experiment 2) concurrent active tests (preference- and grammaticality classification) in an eye-tracking experiment. Eye movements discriminated between sequence types in passive tests and more so in active tests. The eye-movement profile did not differ between preference and grammaticality classification, and it resembled sensitivity effects commonly observed in natural syntax processing. Our findings show that the outcomes of implicit structured sequence learning can be characterized in eye tracking. More specifically, whole trial measures (dwell time, number of fixations) showed robust AGL effects, whereas first-pass measures (first-fixation duration) did not. Furthermore, our findings strengthen the link between artificial and natural syntax processing, and they shed light on the factors that determine performance differences in preference and grammaticality classification tests.Max Planck Institute for PsycholinguisticsDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and BehaviorVetenskapsradetSwedish Dyslexia FoundationAmerican Psychological AssociationSapientiaSilva, SusanaInácio, FilomenaFolia, VasilikiPetersson, Karl Magnus2019-11-20T15:07:22Z2017-092017-09-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/13006eng0278-7393https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000350info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-24T10:25:01Zoai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/13006Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:04:13.740685Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Eye-movements in implicit artificial grammar learning |
title |
Eye-movements in implicit artificial grammar learning |
spellingShingle |
Eye-movements in implicit artificial grammar learning Silva, Susana Syntactic structure Brain potentials Memory Language Grammaticality Mechanisms Contribute Monkeys Systems Macaque Eye-tracking Implicit learning Artificial grammar learning Syntactic processing Preference classification |
title_short |
Eye-movements in implicit artificial grammar learning |
title_full |
Eye-movements in implicit artificial grammar learning |
title_fullStr |
Eye-movements in implicit artificial grammar learning |
title_full_unstemmed |
Eye-movements in implicit artificial grammar learning |
title_sort |
Eye-movements in implicit artificial grammar learning |
author |
Silva, Susana |
author_facet |
Silva, Susana Inácio, Filomena Folia, Vasiliki Petersson, Karl Magnus |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Inácio, Filomena Folia, Vasiliki Petersson, Karl Magnus |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Sapientia |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Susana Inácio, Filomena Folia, Vasiliki Petersson, Karl Magnus |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Syntactic structure Brain potentials Memory Language Grammaticality Mechanisms Contribute Monkeys Systems Macaque Eye-tracking Implicit learning Artificial grammar learning Syntactic processing Preference classification |
topic |
Syntactic structure Brain potentials Memory Language Grammaticality Mechanisms Contribute Monkeys Systems Macaque Eye-tracking Implicit learning Artificial grammar learning Syntactic processing Preference classification |
description |
Artificial grammar learning (AGL) has been probed with forced-choice behavioral tests (active tests). Recent attempts to probe the outcomes of learning (implicitly acquired knowledge) with eye-movement responses (passive tests) have shown null results. However, these latter studies have not tested for sensitivity effects, for example, increased eye movements on a printed violation. In this study, we tested for sensitivity effects in AGL tests with (Experiment 1) and without (Experiment 2) concurrent active tests (preference- and grammaticality classification) in an eye-tracking experiment. Eye movements discriminated between sequence types in passive tests and more so in active tests. The eye-movement profile did not differ between preference and grammaticality classification, and it resembled sensitivity effects commonly observed in natural syntax processing. Our findings show that the outcomes of implicit structured sequence learning can be characterized in eye tracking. More specifically, whole trial measures (dwell time, number of fixations) showed robust AGL effects, whereas first-pass measures (first-fixation duration) did not. Furthermore, our findings strengthen the link between artificial and natural syntax processing, and they shed light on the factors that determine performance differences in preference and grammaticality classification tests. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-09 2017-09-01T00:00:00Z 2019-11-20T15:07:22Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/13006 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/13006 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0278-7393 https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000350 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Psychological Association |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Psychological Association |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799133278301585408 |