CavBench: a benchmark for protein cavity detection methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dias, Sérgio
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Simões, Tiago M. C., Fernandes, Francisco, Martins, Ana Mafalda, Ferreira, Alfredo, Jorge, Joaquim A, Gomes, Abel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/8272
Resumo: Extensive research has been applied to discover new techniques and methods to model protein-ligand interactions. In particular, considerable efforts focused on identifying candidate binding sites, which quite often are active sites that correspond to protein pockets or cavities. Thus, these cavities play an important role in molecular docking. However, there is no established benchmark to assess the accuracy of new cavity detection methods. In practice, each new technique is evaluated using a small set of proteins with known binding sites as ground-truth. However, studies supported by large datasets of known cavities and/or binding sites and statistical classification (i.e., false positives, false negatives, true positives, and true negatives) would yield much stronger and reliable assessments. To this end, we propose CavBench, a generic and extensible benchmark to compare different cavity detection methods relative to diverse ground truth datasets (e.g., PDBsum) using statistical classification methods.
id RCAP_481ecf2adead42469ed34a95df7ad9f5
oai_identifier_str oai:ubibliorum.ubi.pt:10400.6/8272
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling CavBench: a benchmark for protein cavity detection methodsProtein pocketProtein cavity detectionExtensive research has been applied to discover new techniques and methods to model protein-ligand interactions. In particular, considerable efforts focused on identifying candidate binding sites, which quite often are active sites that correspond to protein pockets or cavities. Thus, these cavities play an important role in molecular docking. However, there is no established benchmark to assess the accuracy of new cavity detection methods. In practice, each new technique is evaluated using a small set of proteins with known binding sites as ground-truth. However, studies supported by large datasets of known cavities and/or binding sites and statistical classification (i.e., false positives, false negatives, true positives, and true negatives) would yield much stronger and reliable assessments. To this end, we propose CavBench, a generic and extensible benchmark to compare different cavity detection methods relative to diverse ground truth datasets (e.g., PDBsum) using statistical classification methods.PLOSuBibliorumDias, SérgioSimões, Tiago M. C.Fernandes, FranciscoMartins, Ana MafaldaFerreira, AlfredoJorge, Joaquim AGomes, Abel2020-01-14T17:10:00Z20192019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/8272eng2019-Simoes10.1371/journal.pone.0223596info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-12-15T09:48:11Zoai:ubibliorum.ubi.pt:10400.6/8272Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:48:38.646999Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CavBench: a benchmark for protein cavity detection methods
title CavBench: a benchmark for protein cavity detection methods
spellingShingle CavBench: a benchmark for protein cavity detection methods
Dias, Sérgio
Protein pocket
Protein cavity detection
title_short CavBench: a benchmark for protein cavity detection methods
title_full CavBench: a benchmark for protein cavity detection methods
title_fullStr CavBench: a benchmark for protein cavity detection methods
title_full_unstemmed CavBench: a benchmark for protein cavity detection methods
title_sort CavBench: a benchmark for protein cavity detection methods
author Dias, Sérgio
author_facet Dias, Sérgio
Simões, Tiago M. C.
Fernandes, Francisco
Martins, Ana Mafalda
Ferreira, Alfredo
Jorge, Joaquim A
Gomes, Abel
author_role author
author2 Simões, Tiago M. C.
Fernandes, Francisco
Martins, Ana Mafalda
Ferreira, Alfredo
Jorge, Joaquim A
Gomes, Abel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv uBibliorum
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dias, Sérgio
Simões, Tiago M. C.
Fernandes, Francisco
Martins, Ana Mafalda
Ferreira, Alfredo
Jorge, Joaquim A
Gomes, Abel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Protein pocket
Protein cavity detection
topic Protein pocket
Protein cavity detection
description Extensive research has been applied to discover new techniques and methods to model protein-ligand interactions. In particular, considerable efforts focused on identifying candidate binding sites, which quite often are active sites that correspond to protein pockets or cavities. Thus, these cavities play an important role in molecular docking. However, there is no established benchmark to assess the accuracy of new cavity detection methods. In practice, each new technique is evaluated using a small set of proteins with known binding sites as ground-truth. However, studies supported by large datasets of known cavities and/or binding sites and statistical classification (i.e., false positives, false negatives, true positives, and true negatives) would yield much stronger and reliable assessments. To this end, we propose CavBench, a generic and extensible benchmark to compare different cavity detection methods relative to diverse ground truth datasets (e.g., PDBsum) using statistical classification methods.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
2020-01-14T17:10:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/8272
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/8272
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2019-Simoes
10.1371/journal.pone.0223596
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv PLOS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv PLOS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136380271460352