The impact of artificial intelligence on the creativity of videos
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10773/30624 |
Resumo: | In this study, the impact of using an Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm, Style Transfer, on the evaluation of the creative elements of artistic videos was explored. The aim of this study was to verify to what extent the use of this system contributes to changes in the qualitative and quantitative perception of the elements of creativity present in the videos, and to verify what changes occur. An experimental study was carried out, including two sets of videos that were watched by two groups: 1) a control group (n = 49, composed by 25 experts and 24 non-experts); 2) an experimental group (n = 52, composed by 27 experts and 25 non-experts). The first set, consisting of six videos without AI transformation (shared videos), was shown to both groups, aiming at verifying the equivalence of evaluation criteria. The second set, consisting of six videos (differentiated) with a version transformed by AI (displayed to the experimental group) and another untransformed (displayed to the control group). Each participant was asked to rate the videos, on a five-point Likert scale, on six elements of creativity and to characterize the creativity of each video with two words. The quantitative results showed equivalence of criteria in the shared videos between the experimental group and the control group (only one of 36 comparisons showed significant differences). Regarding quantitative comparisons of the differentiated (experimental versus control), 10 evaluations showed no significant differences, while five had higher evaluations of creativity in the experimental group and five in the control group. Concerning qualitative comparisons, in general, the frequency of terms used by participants in both groups was similar in the shared videos. In the differentiated videos there were some differences. Taken together, the results emphasize the importance of human mediation in the application of an Artificial Intelligence algorithm in creative production, which reinforces the relevance of the concept of Hybrid Intelligence. |
id |
RCAP_4916735af0fca6fcbc9aec1ae8213fda |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/30624 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The impact of artificial intelligence on the creativity of videosArtificial intelligenceArtArtistic productMultimediaStyle transferCreativityIn this study, the impact of using an Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm, Style Transfer, on the evaluation of the creative elements of artistic videos was explored. The aim of this study was to verify to what extent the use of this system contributes to changes in the qualitative and quantitative perception of the elements of creativity present in the videos, and to verify what changes occur. An experimental study was carried out, including two sets of videos that were watched by two groups: 1) a control group (n = 49, composed by 25 experts and 24 non-experts); 2) an experimental group (n = 52, composed by 27 experts and 25 non-experts). The first set, consisting of six videos without AI transformation (shared videos), was shown to both groups, aiming at verifying the equivalence of evaluation criteria. The second set, consisting of six videos (differentiated) with a version transformed by AI (displayed to the experimental group) and another untransformed (displayed to the control group). Each participant was asked to rate the videos, on a five-point Likert scale, on six elements of creativity and to characterize the creativity of each video with two words. The quantitative results showed equivalence of criteria in the shared videos between the experimental group and the control group (only one of 36 comparisons showed significant differences). Regarding quantitative comparisons of the differentiated (experimental versus control), 10 evaluations showed no significant differences, while five had higher evaluations of creativity in the experimental group and five in the control group. Concerning qualitative comparisons, in general, the frequency of terms used by participants in both groups was similar in the shared videos. In the differentiated videos there were some differences. Taken together, the results emphasize the importance of human mediation in the application of an Artificial Intelligence algorithm in creative production, which reinforces the relevance of the concept of Hybrid Intelligence.Neste estudo foi explorado o impacto do uso de um algoritmo de Inteligência Artificial (IA), Style Transfer, na avaliação dos elementos de criatividade de vídeos artísticos. O objetivo deste estudo foi verificar em que medida o uso deste sistema contribui para alterações na perceção qualitativa e quantitativa dos elementos de criatividade presentes nos vídeos, e verificar que mudanças ocorrem. Foi efetuado um estudo experimental, contemplando dois conjuntos de vídeos que foram visualizados por dois grupos: 1) um grupo de controlo (n=49, dos quais 25 peritos e 24 não peritos); 2) um grupo experimental (n=52, dos quais 27 peritos e 25 não peritos). O primeiro conjunto, composto por seis vídeos sem transformação de IA (vídeos partilhados), foi exibido a ambos os grupos, visando a verificação da equivalência de critérios de avaliação. O segundo conjunto, composto por seis vídeos (diferenciados) teve uma versão transformada por IA (exibida ao grupo experimental) e outra não transformada (exibida ao grupo de controlo). A cada participante foi solicitado que avaliasse, numa escala de Likert de cinco pontos, os vídeos, em seis elementos de criatividade e que caracterizasse a criatividade de cada vídeo com duas palavras. Os resultados quantitativos demonstraram equivalência de critérios nos vídeos partilhados entre o grupo experimental e o grupo de controlo (apenas uma de 36 comparações apresentou diferenças significativas). Relativamente à comparação quantitativa dos vídeos diferenciados (experimental versus controlo), 10 avaliações não apresentaram diferenças significativas, enquanto que cinco tiveram avaliações mais elevadas de criatividade no grupo experimental e cinco no grupo de controlo. Nas comparações qualitativas, em geral, a frequência dos termos usados pelos participantes de ambos os grupos foram semelhantes nos vídeos partilhados. Nos vídeos diferenciados ocorreram algumas diferenças. No seu conjunto, os resultados enfatizam a importância da mediação humana na aplicação de um algoritmo de Inteligência artificial na produção criativa, o que reforça a relevância do conceito de Inteligência Híbrida.2021-02-18T09:41:24Z2020-07-17T00:00:00Z2020-07-17info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/30624engRebelo, Ana Daniela Peresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-22T11:59:10Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/30624Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:02:40.747297Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The impact of artificial intelligence on the creativity of videos |
title |
The impact of artificial intelligence on the creativity of videos |
spellingShingle |
The impact of artificial intelligence on the creativity of videos Rebelo, Ana Daniela Peres Artificial intelligence Art Artistic product Multimedia Style transfer Creativity |
title_short |
The impact of artificial intelligence on the creativity of videos |
title_full |
The impact of artificial intelligence on the creativity of videos |
title_fullStr |
The impact of artificial intelligence on the creativity of videos |
title_full_unstemmed |
The impact of artificial intelligence on the creativity of videos |
title_sort |
The impact of artificial intelligence on the creativity of videos |
author |
Rebelo, Ana Daniela Peres |
author_facet |
Rebelo, Ana Daniela Peres |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rebelo, Ana Daniela Peres |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Artificial intelligence Art Artistic product Multimedia Style transfer Creativity |
topic |
Artificial intelligence Art Artistic product Multimedia Style transfer Creativity |
description |
In this study, the impact of using an Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm, Style Transfer, on the evaluation of the creative elements of artistic videos was explored. The aim of this study was to verify to what extent the use of this system contributes to changes in the qualitative and quantitative perception of the elements of creativity present in the videos, and to verify what changes occur. An experimental study was carried out, including two sets of videos that were watched by two groups: 1) a control group (n = 49, composed by 25 experts and 24 non-experts); 2) an experimental group (n = 52, composed by 27 experts and 25 non-experts). The first set, consisting of six videos without AI transformation (shared videos), was shown to both groups, aiming at verifying the equivalence of evaluation criteria. The second set, consisting of six videos (differentiated) with a version transformed by AI (displayed to the experimental group) and another untransformed (displayed to the control group). Each participant was asked to rate the videos, on a five-point Likert scale, on six elements of creativity and to characterize the creativity of each video with two words. The quantitative results showed equivalence of criteria in the shared videos between the experimental group and the control group (only one of 36 comparisons showed significant differences). Regarding quantitative comparisons of the differentiated (experimental versus control), 10 evaluations showed no significant differences, while five had higher evaluations of creativity in the experimental group and five in the control group. Concerning qualitative comparisons, in general, the frequency of terms used by participants in both groups was similar in the shared videos. In the differentiated videos there were some differences. Taken together, the results emphasize the importance of human mediation in the application of an Artificial Intelligence algorithm in creative production, which reinforces the relevance of the concept of Hybrid Intelligence. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-17T00:00:00Z 2020-07-17 2021-02-18T09:41:24Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/30624 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/30624 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137682395234304 |