Daylighting simulation of a heritage building by comparing matrix methods and solar models

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Saraiva, Nuno Baía
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Rodrigues, Eugénio, Gaspar, Adélio Rodrigues, Costa, José Joaquim da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/95096
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.05.085
Resumo: Lighting simulation is a useful instrument in predicting lighting conditions in buildings. Modelers can use several matrix methods according to the buildings’ characteristics and the objectives of the analysis. However, it is unknown which methods are the most appropriate for lighting analysis of heritage buildings. The Joanina Library located in the University of Coimbra – a World Heritage building – was used to compare different matrix methods (2PH, 3PH, and 5PH) under several solar models (BRL, DISC, Perez, and Reindl) using Radiance-based simulations. On-site measurements (indoor and outdoor) were used to calculate each method’s accuracy under different solar models. The combination of the 2PH method with the DISC solar model presented the highest accuracy with an average MBEr and RMSEr of 2.8 % and 43.6 %, respectively. Therefore, the 2PH method was the best choice for the case study, even though the 3PH method may also be considered, especially for parametric studies of improving measures.
id RCAP_4989e8187e57da3fb66655919c3c4ff9
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/95096
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Daylighting simulation of a heritage building by comparing matrix methods and solar modelsLighting modelingHistoric buildingsClimate-based methodsIndoor illuminanceNatural lightingLighting simulation is a useful instrument in predicting lighting conditions in buildings. Modelers can use several matrix methods according to the buildings’ characteristics and the objectives of the analysis. However, it is unknown which methods are the most appropriate for lighting analysis of heritage buildings. The Joanina Library located in the University of Coimbra – a World Heritage building – was used to compare different matrix methods (2PH, 3PH, and 5PH) under several solar models (BRL, DISC, Perez, and Reindl) using Radiance-based simulations. On-site measurements (indoor and outdoor) were used to calculate each method’s accuracy under different solar models. The combination of the 2PH method with the DISC solar model presented the highest accuracy with an average MBEr and RMSEr of 2.8 % and 43.6 %, respectively. Therefore, the 2PH method was the best choice for the case study, even though the 3PH method may also be considered, especially for parametric studies of improving measures.8617-2E18-19EE | EUGÉNIO MIGUEL DE SOUSA RODRIGUESinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionElsevier2021-082023-08-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/95096http://hdl.handle.net/10316/95096https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.05.085eng0038-092Xcv-prod-2548869Saraiva, Nuno BaíaRodrigues, EugénioGaspar, Adélio RodriguesCosta, José Joaquim dainfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-10-27T11:01:04Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/95096Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:13:40.515464Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Daylighting simulation of a heritage building by comparing matrix methods and solar models
title Daylighting simulation of a heritage building by comparing matrix methods and solar models
spellingShingle Daylighting simulation of a heritage building by comparing matrix methods and solar models
Saraiva, Nuno Baía
Lighting modeling
Historic buildings
Climate-based methods
Indoor illuminance
Natural lighting
title_short Daylighting simulation of a heritage building by comparing matrix methods and solar models
title_full Daylighting simulation of a heritage building by comparing matrix methods and solar models
title_fullStr Daylighting simulation of a heritage building by comparing matrix methods and solar models
title_full_unstemmed Daylighting simulation of a heritage building by comparing matrix methods and solar models
title_sort Daylighting simulation of a heritage building by comparing matrix methods and solar models
author Saraiva, Nuno Baía
author_facet Saraiva, Nuno Baía
Rodrigues, Eugénio
Gaspar, Adélio Rodrigues
Costa, José Joaquim da
author_role author
author2 Rodrigues, Eugénio
Gaspar, Adélio Rodrigues
Costa, José Joaquim da
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Saraiva, Nuno Baía
Rodrigues, Eugénio
Gaspar, Adélio Rodrigues
Costa, José Joaquim da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Lighting modeling
Historic buildings
Climate-based methods
Indoor illuminance
Natural lighting
topic Lighting modeling
Historic buildings
Climate-based methods
Indoor illuminance
Natural lighting
description Lighting simulation is a useful instrument in predicting lighting conditions in buildings. Modelers can use several matrix methods according to the buildings’ characteristics and the objectives of the analysis. However, it is unknown which methods are the most appropriate for lighting analysis of heritage buildings. The Joanina Library located in the University of Coimbra – a World Heritage building – was used to compare different matrix methods (2PH, 3PH, and 5PH) under several solar models (BRL, DISC, Perez, and Reindl) using Radiance-based simulations. On-site measurements (indoor and outdoor) were used to calculate each method’s accuracy under different solar models. The combination of the 2PH method with the DISC solar model presented the highest accuracy with an average MBEr and RMSEr of 2.8 % and 43.6 %, respectively. Therefore, the 2PH method was the best choice for the case study, even though the 3PH method may also be considered, especially for parametric studies of improving measures.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08
2023-08-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/95096
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/95096
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.05.085
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/95096
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.05.085
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0038-092X
cv-prod-2548869
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134032338878464