Same Same but Different? Gender Politics and (Trans-)National Value Contestation in Europe on Twitter

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Wallaschek, Stefan
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Kaushik, Kavyanjali, Verbalyte, Monika, Sojka, Aleksandra, Sorci, Giuliana, Trenz, Hans-Jörg, Eigmüller, Monika
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i1.4751
Resumo: The progress achieved in women’s rights and gender equality has become the target of a backlash driven by “anti-gender” activists and right-wing populists across EU member states. To a large extent, this conflict takes place in the digital and social media spheres, illustrating the new mediatized logic of value contestation. Therefore, we ask to what extent are the debates about gender equality on Twitter similar in three European countries, and how do users engage in these debates? We examine these questions by collecting Twitter data around the 2021 International Women’s Day in Germany, Italy, and Poland. First, we show that the debate remains nationally segmented and is predominantly supportive of gender equality. While citizens engage with the gender equality value online, they do so in a prevailingly acclamatory fashion. In contrast, political and societal actors show higher levels of engagement with the value and receive more interactions on Twitter. Our study highlights the relevance of national contexts to the analysis of (transnational) social media debates and the limited political engagement of citizens on Twitter across Europe. We also critically discuss the strengths and weaknesses of a cross-country social media comparison.
id RCAP_4b09708e4209bef747233c58c32c373e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4751
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Same Same but Different? Gender Politics and (Trans-)National Value Contestation in Europe on Twittergender equality; Germany; international women’s day; Italy; Poland; Twitter; value conflictsThe progress achieved in women’s rights and gender equality has become the target of a backlash driven by “anti-gender” activists and right-wing populists across EU member states. To a large extent, this conflict takes place in the digital and social media spheres, illustrating the new mediatized logic of value contestation. Therefore, we ask to what extent are the debates about gender equality on Twitter similar in three European countries, and how do users engage in these debates? We examine these questions by collecting Twitter data around the 2021 International Women’s Day in Germany, Italy, and Poland. First, we show that the debate remains nationally segmented and is predominantly supportive of gender equality. While citizens engage with the gender equality value online, they do so in a prevailingly acclamatory fashion. In contrast, political and societal actors show higher levels of engagement with the value and receive more interactions on Twitter. Our study highlights the relevance of national contexts to the analysis of (transnational) social media debates and the limited political engagement of citizens on Twitter across Europe. We also critically discuss the strengths and weaknesses of a cross-country social media comparison.Cogitatio2022-02-17info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i1.4751oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4751Politics and Governance; Vol 10, No 1 (2022): Analyzing Citizen Engagement with European Politics Through Social Media; 146-1602183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4751https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i1.4751https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4751/4751https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/4751/2274Copyright (c) 2022 Stefan Wallaschek, Kavyanjali Kaushik, Monika Verbalyte, Aleksandra Sojka, Giuliana Sorci, Hans-Jörg Trenz, Monika Eigmüllerhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWallaschek, StefanKaushik, KavyanjaliVerbalyte, MonikaSojka, AleksandraSorci, GiulianaTrenz, Hans-JörgEigmüller, Monika2022-12-22T15:15:43Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4751Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:12.296596Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Same Same but Different? Gender Politics and (Trans-)National Value Contestation in Europe on Twitter
title Same Same but Different? Gender Politics and (Trans-)National Value Contestation in Europe on Twitter
spellingShingle Same Same but Different? Gender Politics and (Trans-)National Value Contestation in Europe on Twitter
Wallaschek, Stefan
gender equality; Germany; international women’s day; Italy; Poland; Twitter; value conflicts
title_short Same Same but Different? Gender Politics and (Trans-)National Value Contestation in Europe on Twitter
title_full Same Same but Different? Gender Politics and (Trans-)National Value Contestation in Europe on Twitter
title_fullStr Same Same but Different? Gender Politics and (Trans-)National Value Contestation in Europe on Twitter
title_full_unstemmed Same Same but Different? Gender Politics and (Trans-)National Value Contestation in Europe on Twitter
title_sort Same Same but Different? Gender Politics and (Trans-)National Value Contestation in Europe on Twitter
author Wallaschek, Stefan
author_facet Wallaschek, Stefan
Kaushik, Kavyanjali
Verbalyte, Monika
Sojka, Aleksandra
Sorci, Giuliana
Trenz, Hans-Jörg
Eigmüller, Monika
author_role author
author2 Kaushik, Kavyanjali
Verbalyte, Monika
Sojka, Aleksandra
Sorci, Giuliana
Trenz, Hans-Jörg
Eigmüller, Monika
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wallaschek, Stefan
Kaushik, Kavyanjali
Verbalyte, Monika
Sojka, Aleksandra
Sorci, Giuliana
Trenz, Hans-Jörg
Eigmüller, Monika
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv gender equality; Germany; international women’s day; Italy; Poland; Twitter; value conflicts
topic gender equality; Germany; international women’s day; Italy; Poland; Twitter; value conflicts
description The progress achieved in women’s rights and gender equality has become the target of a backlash driven by “anti-gender” activists and right-wing populists across EU member states. To a large extent, this conflict takes place in the digital and social media spheres, illustrating the new mediatized logic of value contestation. Therefore, we ask to what extent are the debates about gender equality on Twitter similar in three European countries, and how do users engage in these debates? We examine these questions by collecting Twitter data around the 2021 International Women’s Day in Germany, Italy, and Poland. First, we show that the debate remains nationally segmented and is predominantly supportive of gender equality. While citizens engage with the gender equality value online, they do so in a prevailingly acclamatory fashion. In contrast, political and societal actors show higher levels of engagement with the value and receive more interactions on Twitter. Our study highlights the relevance of national contexts to the analysis of (transnational) social media debates and the limited political engagement of citizens on Twitter across Europe. We also critically discuss the strengths and weaknesses of a cross-country social media comparison.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-17
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i1.4751
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4751
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i1.4751
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4751
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4751
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i1.4751
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4751/4751
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/4751/2274
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 10, No 1 (2022): Analyzing Citizen Engagement with European Politics Through Social Media; 146-160
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130668054085632