Political and Party Discussions on Facebook: The Limit between Freedom of Expression and Intolerance
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.9.2021.119-128 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Facebook sparked the interest of many researchers by becoming the largest social network in the world, given that anonymity allows many users to post intolerant comments without worrying about the consequences or punishments for their actions. Objective: Conduct an analysis of the comments of political party intolerance on Facebook. Method: It is an exploratory and descriptive qualitative study in which relevant publications from groups and pages referring to political party discussions on Facebook were selected. The comments of these publications were gathered in two corpus and the textual contents were processed using the IRAMUTEQ software. Results: The first corpus indicated the formation of 4 classes, (1) Election (27%); (2) Political Discourse (29.7%); (3) Oppositions (24.3%) and (4) Political Crimes (18.9%). The second corpus indicated the formation of 2 classes, (1) “Legacy of the old government” (52,2%) and (2) “Consequences of the current government” (47,8%). Conclusions. party-political discussions are anchored in stereotyped worldviews and some elements referring to the format of virtual interaction are at the base of the open and violent expression of political intolerance. |
id |
RCAP_4b187a07bc5306c68d9423c4c143f987 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/360 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Political and Party Discussions on Facebook: The Limit between Freedom of Expression and IntoleranceDiscussões Político-Partidárias no Facebook: O limite entre a liberdade de expressão e a intolerânciaRede SocialIntolerânciaPolíticaSocial NetworkIntolerancePolicyIntroduction: Facebook sparked the interest of many researchers by becoming the largest social network in the world, given that anonymity allows many users to post intolerant comments without worrying about the consequences or punishments for their actions. Objective: Conduct an analysis of the comments of political party intolerance on Facebook. Method: It is an exploratory and descriptive qualitative study in which relevant publications from groups and pages referring to political party discussions on Facebook were selected. The comments of these publications were gathered in two corpus and the textual contents were processed using the IRAMUTEQ software. Results: The first corpus indicated the formation of 4 classes, (1) Election (27%); (2) Political Discourse (29.7%); (3) Oppositions (24.3%) and (4) Political Crimes (18.9%). The second corpus indicated the formation of 2 classes, (1) “Legacy of the old government” (52,2%) and (2) “Consequences of the current government” (47,8%). Conclusions. party-political discussions are anchored in stereotyped worldviews and some elements referring to the format of virtual interaction are at the base of the open and violent expression of political intolerance.Introdução. O Facebook despertou o interesse de muitos pesquisadores ao se tornar a maior rede social do mundo, tendo em vista que o anonimato possibilita que muitos usuários postem comentários intolerantes sem se preocuparem com as consequências ou punições por suas ações. Objetivo. Realizar uma análise das discussões político-partidária no Facebook. Método. Trata-se de um estudo qualitativo de caráter exploratório e descritivo em que foram selecionadas publicações relevantes de grupos e páginas referentes às discussões político-partidária no Facebook. Os comentários destas publicações foram reunidos em dois corpus e os conteúdos textuais processados no software IRAMUTEQ. Resultados. O primeiro corpus indicou a formação de 4 classes, (1) Eleição (27%); (2) Discurso Político (29,7%); (3) Oposições (24.3%) e (4) Crimes Políticos (18.9%). O segundo corpus indicou a formação de 2 classes, (1) “Legado do antigo governo” (52,2%) e (2) “Consequências do atual governo” (47,8%). Conclusões. as discussões político-partidárias se ancoram em visões de mundo estereotipadas e alguns elementos referentes ao formato de interação virtual estão na base da expressão aberta e violenta de intolerância política.Ludomedia2021-07-08info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.9.2021.119-128https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.9.2021.119-128New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 9 (2021): Qualitative Research in Social Sciences: Advances and Challenges; 119-128New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 9 (2021): Investigación cualitativa en ciencias sociales: avances y desafíos; 119-128New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 9 (2021): Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: avanços e desafios; 119-1282184-777010.36367/ntqr.9.2021reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/360https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/360/363Alanda Maria Ferro PereiraNívea Kelly Santos da SilvaKathleen Caroline de Lima CarlosSheyla FernandesRenata Verasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-08-13T09:13:02Zoai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/360Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:48:10.180113Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Political and Party Discussions on Facebook: The Limit between Freedom of Expression and Intolerance Discussões Político-Partidárias no Facebook: O limite entre a liberdade de expressão e a intolerância |
title |
Political and Party Discussions on Facebook: The Limit between Freedom of Expression and Intolerance |
spellingShingle |
Political and Party Discussions on Facebook: The Limit between Freedom of Expression and Intolerance Alanda Maria Ferro Pereira Rede Social Intolerância Política Social Network Intolerance Policy |
title_short |
Political and Party Discussions on Facebook: The Limit between Freedom of Expression and Intolerance |
title_full |
Political and Party Discussions on Facebook: The Limit between Freedom of Expression and Intolerance |
title_fullStr |
Political and Party Discussions on Facebook: The Limit between Freedom of Expression and Intolerance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Political and Party Discussions on Facebook: The Limit between Freedom of Expression and Intolerance |
title_sort |
Political and Party Discussions on Facebook: The Limit between Freedom of Expression and Intolerance |
author |
Alanda Maria Ferro Pereira |
author_facet |
Alanda Maria Ferro Pereira Nívea Kelly Santos da Silva Kathleen Caroline de Lima Carlos Sheyla Fernandes Renata Veras |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nívea Kelly Santos da Silva Kathleen Caroline de Lima Carlos Sheyla Fernandes Renata Veras |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alanda Maria Ferro Pereira Nívea Kelly Santos da Silva Kathleen Caroline de Lima Carlos Sheyla Fernandes Renata Veras |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Rede Social Intolerância Política Social Network Intolerance Policy |
topic |
Rede Social Intolerância Política Social Network Intolerance Policy |
description |
Introduction: Facebook sparked the interest of many researchers by becoming the largest social network in the world, given that anonymity allows many users to post intolerant comments without worrying about the consequences or punishments for their actions. Objective: Conduct an analysis of the comments of political party intolerance on Facebook. Method: It is an exploratory and descriptive qualitative study in which relevant publications from groups and pages referring to political party discussions on Facebook were selected. The comments of these publications were gathered in two corpus and the textual contents were processed using the IRAMUTEQ software. Results: The first corpus indicated the formation of 4 classes, (1) Election (27%); (2) Political Discourse (29.7%); (3) Oppositions (24.3%) and (4) Political Crimes (18.9%). The second corpus indicated the formation of 2 classes, (1) “Legacy of the old government” (52,2%) and (2) “Consequences of the current government” (47,8%). Conclusions. party-political discussions are anchored in stereotyped worldviews and some elements referring to the format of virtual interaction are at the base of the open and violent expression of political intolerance. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-08 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.9.2021.119-128 https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.9.2021.119-128 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.9.2021.119-128 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/360 https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/360/363 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ludomedia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ludomedia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 9 (2021): Qualitative Research in Social Sciences: Advances and Challenges; 119-128 New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 9 (2021): Investigación cualitativa en ciencias sociales: avances y desafíos; 119-128 New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 9 (2021): Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: avanços e desafios; 119-128 2184-7770 10.36367/ntqr.9.2021 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130348234211328 |